| Literature DB >> 30011795 |
Yingnan Niu1,2, Rendong Li3, Juan Qiu4, Xingjian Xu5, Duan Huang6,7, Yubing Qu8,9.
Abstract
This study compared changes in the spatial clustering of schistosomiasis in Jianghan Plain, China by applying Kulldorff's spatial scan statistic. The Geodetector software was employed to detect the environmental determinants of schistosomiasis annually from 2007 to 2012. The most likely spatial cluster in 2007 covered the north-central part of Jianghan Plain, whereas those observed from 2008 to 2012 were toward the south, with extended coverage in generally the same areas across various periods, and some variation nevertheless in precise locations. Furthermore, the 2007 period was more likely to be clustered than any other period. We found that temperature, land use, and soil type were the most critical factors associated with infection rates in humans. In addition, land use and soil type had the greatest impact on the prevalence of schistosomiasis in 2009, whereas this effect was minimal in 2007. The effect of temperature on schistosomiasis prevalence reached its maximum in 2010, whereas in 2008, this effect was minimal. Differences observed in the effects of those two factors on the spatial distribution of human schistosomiasis were inconsistent, showing statistical significance in some years and a lack thereof in others. Moreover, when two factors operated simultaneously, a trend of enhanced interaction was consistently observed. High-risk areas with strong interactions of affected factors should be targeted for disease control interventions.Entities:
Keywords: China; Jianghan Plain; clustering; environment determinants; schistosomiasis
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30011795 PMCID: PMC6068921 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15071481
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Locations of study area and sample villages.
Figure 2Spatial clusters detected by utilizing the discrete Poisson model from 2007 to 2012 in Jianghan Plain.
Spatial analysis scanning for clusters with large populations of schistosomiasis infections using Kulldorff’s spatial scan statistic.
| Year | Number of Clusters | Most Likely Cluster | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Villages | Latitude | Longitude | Radius (km) | LLR | RR | |||
| 2007 | 109 | 259 | 30.201 | 112.575 | 22.760 | 10,609.116 | 2.448 | 0 |
| 2008 | 74 | 1135 | 29.834 | 112.450 | 62.666 | 12,127.637 | 2.118 | 0 |
| 2009 | 88 | 996 | 29.840 | 112.424 | 59.289 | 8431.589 | 1.979 | 0 |
| 2010 | 70 | 1106 | 29.846 | 112.494 | 60.754 | 10,308.459 | 2.261 | 0 |
| 2011 | 68 | 1147 | 29.697 | 112.539 | 72.155 | 8138.424 | 2.112 | 0 |
| 2012 | 42 | 1147 | 29.697 | 112.539 | 72.155 | 7303.115 | 2.174 | 0 |
LLR, log likelihood ratio; RR, relative risk.
Figure 3Space–time clusters detected using the Space–Time Permutation model.
Space–time analysis of clusters with large populations of schistosomiasis infections using Kulldorff’s spatial scan statistic.
| Cluster | Number of Clusters | Number of Villages | Latitude | Longitude | Radius (km) | Time | LLR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most likely cluster | 1 | 1014 | 30.755 | 112.970 | 87.938 | 2007 | 1404.203 | 0 |
| Secondary likely clusters | 2 | 116 | 30.290 | 111.741 | 30.583 | 2007 | 439.265 | 0 |
| 3 | 500 | 29.689 | 112.274 | 47.596 | 2010–2012 | 395.753 | 0 | |
| 4 | 23 | 30.052 | 113.885 | 8.545 | 2010–2011 | 153.546 | 0 | |
| 5 | 4 | 30.110 | 113.723 | 5.146 | 2009 | 82.678 | 0 |
LLR, log likelihood ratio.
Results of factor detector analysis.
| Year | Land Use (%) | Soil Type (%) | Average NDVI (%) | Silt (%) | Sand (%) | Clay (%) | DER (%) | Average LSTD (%) | Average LSTN (%) | Average TDN (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 3.37 | 1.93 * | 0.71 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 1.04 | 0.08 * | 0.34 * | 5.48 | 5.71 |
| 2008 | 4.69 | 2.46 | 0.25 * | 0.15 * | 1.38 | 1.08 | 0.51 | 0.63 | 1.61 | 1.59 |
| 2009 | 5.5 | 4.26 | 0.76 | 0.26 * | 2.15 | 2.08 | 0.58 | 2.15 | 2.86 | 0.46 * |
| 2010 | 5.13 | 4.06 | 0.81 | 0.25 * | 2.44 | 1.84 | 0.58 | 4.56 | 10.53 | 1.81 |
| 2011 | 4.05 | 3.09 | 0.34 * | 0.16 * | 2.64 | 1.81 | 0.34 | 2.98 | 2.66 | 3.83 |
| 2012 | 4.28 | 2.67 | 0.43 | 0.57 * | 2.19 | 2.10 | 0.06 * | 0.76 | 6.50 | 4.01 |
Average NDVI, average normalized different vegetation index; DER, distance from the endemic village to the river; average LSTD, average land surface temperature at daytime; average LSTN, average land surface temperature at night; average TDN, average day and night temperature; * denotes p-value > 0.05.
Figure 4Statistical significance of q-value between different risk factors. Average NDVI, average normalized different vegetation index; DER, distance from the endemic villages to the river; average LSTD, average land surface temperature at daytime; average LSTN, average land surface temperature at night; average TDN, average day and night temperatures. 1 indicates significant differences between the two risk factors, with 95% confidence.
Figure 5Results of analysis of the interaction detectors. Average NDVI, average normalized different vegetation index; DER, distance from the endemic villages to the river; average LSTD, average land surface temperature at daytime; average LSTN, average land surface temperature at night; average TDN, average day and night temperatures.
Figure 6Disease transmission and life cycle of schistosomiasis.