| Literature DB >> 23516656 |
Xi-Cheng Hong1, Xing-Jian Xu, Xi Chen, Yue-Sheng Li, Chuan-Hua Yu, Yi Yuan, Yan-Yan Chen, Ren-Dong Li, Juan Qiu, Zong-Chuan Liu, Ping Yi, Guang-Hui Ren, Hong-Bin He.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: More than 80% of schistosomiasis patients in China live in the lake and marshland regions. The purpose of our study is to assess the effect of a comprehensive strategy to control transmission of Schistosoma japonicum in marshland regions. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23516656 PMCID: PMC3597472 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Figure 1Trial flowchart.
Figure 2Location of the study villages in the mid-to-lower reaches of the Yangtze River, Hubei province, China.
Characteristics of the participants in intervention and control groups in 2008.
| Characteristics | Control group (n = 5323) | Intervention group (n = 5050) |
| Age, years | 38.4 (13.6) | 39.4 (13.4) |
| Sex ratio (F/M), n | 2686/2637 | 2617/2433 |
Values are mean (SD) or number.
P<0.001 for control group vs. intervention group.
Schistosoma japonicum infection in humans in intervention and control groups*.
| Village | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | ||||||||
| N | Infection No. | Prevalence % (CI) | N | Infection No. | Prevalence % (CI) | N | Infection No. | Prevalence % (CI) | N | Infection No. | Prevalence % (CI) | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| E Jinghu | 535 | 19 | 3.55 (1.98, 5.12) | 508 | 16 | 3.15 (1.63, 4.67) | 452 | 10 | 2.21 (0.85, 3.57) | 436 | 5 | 1.15 (0.14, 2.15) |
| Gu Shengsi | 1102 | 38 | 3.45 (2.37, 4.53) | 1054 | 32 | 3.04 (2.00, 4.07) | 997 | 19 | 1.91 (1.06, 2.76) | 959 | 8 | 0.83 (0.26, 1.41) |
| Jianhong | 765 | 23 | 3.01 (1.79, 4.22) | 718 | 17 | 2.37 (1.25, 3.48) | 685 | 12 | 1.75 (0.77, 2.74) | 637 | 4 | 0.63 (0.01, 1.24) |
| Lianmeng | 994 | 38 | 3.82 (2.63, 5.02) | 964 | 31 | 3.22 (2.10, 4.33) | 892 | 19 | 2.13 (1.18, 3.08) | 885 | 8 | 0.90 (0.28, 1.53) |
| Tongqiao | 1021 | 33 | 3.23 (2.15, 4.32) | 1001 | 24 | 2.40 (1.45, 3.35) | 990 | 21 | 2.12 (1.22, 3.02) | 963 | 8 | 0.83 (0.26, 1.41) |
| Tuanjie | 633 | 21 | 3.32 (1.92, 4.72) | 626 | 18 | 2.88 (1.56, 4.19) | 611 | 12 | 1.96 (0.86, 3.07) | 587 | 3 | 0.51 (−0.07, 1.09) |
|
| 5050 | 172 | 3.41 (2.91 ,3.91) | 4871 | 138 | 2.83 (2.37 ,3.30) | 4627 | 93 | 2.01 (1.61 ,2.41) | 4467 | 36 | 0.81 (0.54 ,1.07) |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Guoqing | 788 | 26 | 3.30 (2.05, 4.55) | 755 | 21 | 2.78 (1.61, 3.96) | 737 | 22 | 2.99 (1.75, 4.22) | 716 | 16 | 2.23 (1.15, 3.32) |
| Nanyang | 1035 | 37 | 3.57 (2.44, 4.71) | 967 | 30 | 3.10 (2.01, 4.20) | 921 | 26 | 2.82 (1.75, 3.89) | 914 | 23 | 2.52 (1.50, 3.53) |
| Qingyun | 894 | 26 | 2.91 (1.80, 4.01) | 812 | 23 | 2.83 (1.69, 3.98) | 750 | 21 | 2.80 (1.62, 3.98) | 748 | 20 | 2.67 (1.52, 3.83) |
| Qingji | 963 | 32 | 3.32 (2.19, 4.46) | 889 | 28 | 3.15 (2.00, 4.30) | 822 | 25 | 3.04 (1.86, 4.22) | 818 | 23 | 2.81 (1.68, 3.95) |
| Zhu Jiahu | 712 | 22 | 3.09 (1.82, 4.36) | 697 | 17 | 2.44 (1.29, 3.59) | 683 | 16 | 2.34 (1.21, 3.48) | 595 | 16 | 2.69 (1.39, 3.99) |
| Tongsheng | 931 | 27 | 2.90 (1.82, 3.98) | 807 | 22 | 2.73 (1.60, 3.85) | 727 | 18 | 2.48 (1.34, 3.61) | 696 | 16 | 2.30 (1.18, 3.41) |
|
| 5323 | 170 | 3.19 (2.72, 3.67) | 4927 | 141 | 2.86 (2.40 ,3.33) | 4640 | 128 | 2.76 (2.29 ,3.23) | 4487 | 114 | 2.54 (2.08 ,3.00) |
CI denote 95% confidence intervals.
As compared with 2008 in the intervention group, there was a statistically significant change in the rate of infection in 2010 and 2011 (P<0.001), and there was no statistically significant change in 2009 (P = 0.101).
As compared with 2008 in the control group, there was no statistically significant change in the rate of infection from 2009 to 2011 (P = 0.328, P = 0.204, P = 0.055, respectively).
Analyzing the risk of Schistosoma japonicum infection in humans by generalized linear model*.
| Variables | OR (95% CI) | P-value |
| Intercept | 0.012 (0.009, 0.016) | <0.001 |
| Age | 1.004 (0.999, 1.009) | 0.091 |
| Gender | ||
| Female | 1.047 (0.919, 1.193) | 0.492 |
| Male | 1.000 | - |
| Study year | ||
| 2008 | 2.026 (1.670, 2.460) | <0.001 |
| 2009 | 1.734 (1.417, 2.123) | <0.001 |
| 2010 | 1.436 (1.166, 1.768) | <0.001 |
| 2011 | 1.000 | - |
| Group | ||
| Control group | 1.250 (1.095, 1.427) | 0.001 |
| Intervention group | 1.000 | - |
The model includes participants' age, gender, study year, group.
Schistosoma japonicum infection in bovines in intervention and control groups*.
| Year | Intervention group | Control group | |||||
| N | Infection No. (%) | N | Infection No. (%) | P-value | P-value | P-value | |
| 2008 | 305 | 10 (3.3) | 345 | 11 (3.2) | - | - | 1.000 |
| 2009 | 309 | 9 (2.9) | 337 | 9 (2.7) | 0.820 | 0.821 | 1.000 |
| 2010 | 311 | 4 (1.3) | 325 | 8 (2.5) | 0.111 | 0.646 | 0.385 |
| 2011 | 318 | 0 (0.0) | 313 | 8 (2.6) | <0.001 | 0.650 | 0.004 |
Statistical method was the Fisher exactly probability test.
Compared with 2008 in the intervention group.
Compared with 2008 in the control group.
Compared between the intervention and control groups from 2008 to 2011.
Schistosoma japonicum infection in snails in intervention and control groups*.
| Year | Intervention group | Control group | ||||||
| N | Infection No. | N | Infection No. | P-value | P-value | P-value | ||
| 2008 | 6,219 | 11 | 4,574 | 9 | - | - | 0.824 | |
| 2009 | 5,975 | 9 | 8,664 | 6 | 0.824 | 0.054 | 0.187 | |
| 2010 | 25,010 | 0 | 11,889 | 13 | <0.001 | 0.231 | <0.001 | |
| 2011 | 15,490 | 0 | 9,493 | 8 | <0.001 | 0.116 | <0.001 | |
Statistical method was the Fisher exactly probability test.
Compared with 2008 in the intervention group.
Compared with 2008 in the control group.
Compared between the intervention and control groups from 2008 to 2011.