Literature DB >> 30011050

Short-term Medical Complications Following Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails.

Jane Liu, Nicholas B Frisch, Nima Mehran, Mossub Qatu, S Trent Guthrie.   

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate whether there is an increased rate of short-term medical complications following short vs long cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. A total of 899 patients treated surgically with cephalomedullary nails from January 1, 2005, to September 1, 2014, were included. Patients who received short nails (n=334) were older and had a higher incidence of coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus compared with patients who received long nails (n=565). The incidences of 30-day medical complications, including myocardial infarction, stroke, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, blood transfusion, non-surgical site infection, surgical site infection, and mortality, were recorded. The orthopedic complications of periprosthetic fracture of the ipsilateral hip and implant failure through the latest outpatient follow-up were recorded. No significant difference was found between nails for any studied medical complication (63.5% short vs 66.0% long, P=.4393) or mortality (6.9% short vs 5.3% long, P=.3322). There was also no significant difference in the incidence of orthopedic complications (P=.70). Longer operating room time was associated with superficial surgical site infection. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):e636-e642.]. Copyright 2018, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30011050     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20180711-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  5 in total

1.  How are peri-implant fractures below short versus long cephalomedullary nails different?

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Brett P Salazar; Jamie Furness; James E Feng; Malcolm R DeBaun; Sean T Campbell; Justin F Lucas; William W Cross; Philipp Leucht; Kevin D Grant; Michael J Gardner; Julius A Bishop
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-09-09

2.  Failure of short versus long cephalomedullary nail after intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Pernille Engell Bovbjerg; Morten Schultz Larsen; Carsten Fladmose Madsen; Jesper Schønnemann
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-06

3.  Short or long intramedullary devices for hip fracture? A systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Piers R J Page; William E C Poole; Kanishk Shah; Piyush K Upadhyay
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-29

4.  Treatment of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures with Long versus Short Cephalomedullary Nails.

Authors:  Cameron Sadeghi; Heather A Prentice; Kanu M Okike; Elizabeth W Paxton
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2020

5.  Clinical Outcomes of Intermediate-Length Cephalomedullary Nails for Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Repair in Older Adults.

Authors:  Paul A Enns; Sue M Nyberg; Gina M Berg; Morgan A Galliart; Brent D Sarauer; Andrew A Scheer; Bradley R Dart; Chad M Corrigan
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2020-05-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.