Literature DB >> 30009981

Reduced Relapse Incidence with FLAMSA-RIC Compared with Busulfan/Fludarabine for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Patients in First or Second Complete Remission: A Study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Thomas Heinicke1, Myriam Labopin2, Christoph Schmid3, Emmanuelle Polge2, Gérard Socié4, Didier Blaise5, Ghulam J Mufti6, Anne Huynh7, Arne Brecht8, Marie-Pierre Ledoux9, Jean Yves Cahn10, Noel Milpied11, Christof Scheid12, Yosr Hicheri13, Mohamad Mohty14, Bipin N Savani15, Arnon Nagler16.   

Abstract

Busulfan/fludarabine (BuFlu) is a widely used conditioning regimen for patients with myeloid malignancies. The sequential FLAMSA (fludarabine + Ara-C + amsacrine chemotherapy) protocol followed by either cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation (FLAMSA-TBI) or cyclophosphamide and busulfan (FLAMSA-Bu) has shown remarkable activity in high-risk acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) patients. Here we compare the outcomes of AML patients transplanted in first complete remission (CR1) or second complete remission (CR2) after conditioning with BuFlu or FLAMSA. Eligible patients had their first allogeneic stem cell transplantation for AML in CR1 or CR2 between January 2005 and June 2016. Donors were matched related or unrelated with up to 1 mismatch. Conditioning consisted of either BuFlu or FLAMSA. Propensity score matching was applied and comparisons were performed using weighted Cox regression. BuFlu conditioning was used in 1197 patients, whereas FLAMSA-TBI and FLAMSA-Bu were used in 258 and 141 patients, respectively. Median follow-up of survivors was 24.72 months. In univariate analysis, relapse incidence (RI) was 30.3%, 21.9%, and 23.1% in the BuFlu, FLAMSA-TBI, and FLAMSA-Bu groups, respectively (P < .01), and nonrelapse mortality at 2 years was 16.1%, 16.4%, and 26.7%, respectively (P < .01). Leukemia-free survival (LFS) at 2 years was 53.6%, 61.6%, and 50.1%, respectively (P = .03). Weighted Cox regression revealed that FLAMSA-TBI compared with BuFlu was associated with lower RI (hazard ratio [HR], .64; 95% confidence interval [CI], .42 to .98; P = .04) and a trend for better LFS (HR, .72; 95% CI, .49 to 1.06; P = .09). These results suggest that compared with BuFlu, conditioning with FLAMSA-TBI leads to reduced RI at 2 years in AML patients transplanted in CR1 or CR2.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Busulfan; FLAMSA; Fludarabine; Nonmyeloablative conditioning; Reduced-intensity conditioning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30009981     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  4 in total

1.  Decitabine induction with myeloablative conditioning and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in high-risk patients with myeloid malignancies is associated with a high rate of infectious complications.

Authors:  Christopher R D'Angelo; Aric Hall; Kaitlin M Woo; KyungMann Kim; Walter Longo; Peiman Hematti; Natalie Callander; Vaishalee P Kenkre; Ryan Mattison; Mark Juckett
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.156

Review 2.  FLAMSA-RIC for Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Weerapat Owattanapanich; Patompong Ungprasert; Verena Wais; Smith Kungwankiattichai; Donald Bunjes; Florian Kuchenbauer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 3.  [Bone marrow transplantation patients in the intensive care unit].

Authors:  S-S Stecher; H J Stemmler; J Tischer; M von Bergwelt-Baildon; T Liebregts; A Fraccaroli
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 4.  TOP2B: The First Thirty Years.

Authors:  Caroline A Austin; Ka C Lee; Rebecca L Swan; Mushtaq M Khazeem; Catriona M Manville; Peter Cridland; Achim Treumann; Andrew Porter; Nick J Morris; Ian G Cowell
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.