Literature DB >> 30008883

Intrarenal urothelial cancers confused as infiltrative renal masses: Report of 22 cases and literature review.

Xiaobo Ding1, Xiaobo Ma2, Yatao Jia3, Hongfei Li3, Yanbo Wang3.   

Abstract

Distinguishing infiltrative renal masses (IRMs) from intrarenal urothelial cancers (IUCs) is critically important, but may be challenging for any radiologist or urologist. The present study aimed to summarize the clinical, imaging and pathological characteristics of IRM, which were postoperatively confirmed as IUC. The analysis was performed using the records of 22 patients who were preoperatively diagnosed with IRM but the results of percutaneous biopsies or postoperative pathological analyses led to diagnoses of urothelial cancers (UCs) from January 2011 to December 2017. The demographic data, computed tomography (CT) imaging features and pathological characteristics were evaluated. The present study also reviewed the literature concerning the IRM and IUC. The mean age of patients was 62 years and 86.4% of them were >55 years. The sex and tumor side distributions were equal. Hematuria and/or flank pain were observed in 86.4% of patients. All patients exhibited endophytic solid renal masses with unclear tumor boundaries on CT images. The kidneys of 81.8% of patients maintained their normal shape while mild alternations were observed in 18.2% of cases. A total of 81.8% of patients maintained the reniform shape and 18.2% exhibited mild contour change. Of all patients, all tumors exhibited less or equal attenuation on unenhanced CT images and they were mildlyimproved on enhanced CT. A total of 6 cases were confirmed by biopsy, when patients underwent laparoscopic nephroureterectomy instead of radical nephrectomy. The remaining 16 patients underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy but the postoperative pathological diagnoses revealed the presence of UCs. All postoperatively confirmed cancers were stages T3 and T4 (62.5 and 37.5%, respectively). UCs should be suspected in middle aged or elderly middle-elderly patients presenting renal masses with endophytic solid unclear tumor boundary on unenhanced and slightly enhanced CT images, accompanied with hematuria and/or flank pain. Preoperative biopsy is preferred for complicated cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  case report; infiltrative renal masses; intrarenal urothelial cancers; literature review

Year:  2018        PMID: 30008883      PMCID: PMC6036454          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  23 in total

Review 1.  Upper tract urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Adam Froemming; Theodora Potretzke; Naoki Takahashi; Bohyun Kim
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  Focal ablation therapy for renal cancer in the era of active surveillance and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Serge Ginzburg; Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Imaging findings of hereditary renal tumors, a review of what the radiologist should know.

Authors:  Marcin Czarniecki; Rabindra Gautam; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 4.  Management of Renal Masses and Localized Renal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Michael H Johnson; Hiten D Patel; Stephen M Sozio; Ritu Sharma; Emmanuel Iyoha; Eric B Bass; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Safety and diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous biopsy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Steven Y Huang; Kamran Ahrar; Sanjay Gupta; Michael J Wallace; Joe E Ensor; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Surena F Matin
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Ureteroscopic biopsy of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: improved diagnostic accuracy and histopathological considerations using a multi-biopsy approach.

Authors:  E Guarnizo; C P Pavlovich; M Seiba; D L Carlson; E D Vaughan; R E Sosa
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Epidemiology, diagnosis, preoperative evaluation and prognostic assessment of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

Authors:  Francesco Soria; Shahrokh F Shariat; Seth P Lerner; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Michael Rink; Wassim Kassouf; Philippe E Spiess; Yair Lotan; Dingwei Ye; Mario I Fernández; Eiji Kikuchi; Daher C Chade; Marko Babjuk; Arthur P Grollman; George N Thalmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Infiltrative renal lesions: CT-sonographic-pathologic correlation.

Authors:  D S Hartman; A J Davidson; C J Davis; S M Goldman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Multidetector CT imaging features of invasive renal parenchyma urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Qingqiang Zhu; Wenrong Zhu; Jingtao Wu; Wenxin Chen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Preoperative Lymphocyte-Monocyte Ratio Ameliorates the Accuracy of Differential Diagnosis in Non-Metastatic Infiltrative Renal Masses.

Authors:  Jang Hee Han; Young Eun Yoon; Sook Young Kim; Young In Cho; Koon Ho Rha; Young Deuk Choi; Woong Kyu Han
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.759

View more
  1 in total

1.  Inadvertent radical nephrectomy leads to worse prognosis in renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma patients: A propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Feixiang Wu; Pan Zhang; Lingxun Li; Shiqing Lin; Jianhong Liu; Yi Sun; Yuanlong Wang; Chengjun Luo; Yu Huang; Xiao Yan; Meng Zhang; Guixi Liu; Kun Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.