| Literature DB >> 30008769 |
Aleksejus Zorinas1, Vilius Janušauskas1, Giedrius Davidavičius1, Rokas Šimakauskas2, Lina Puodžiukaitė1, Diana Zakarkaitė1, Valdas Bilkis1, Rasa Joana Čypienė1, Robertas Stasys Samalavičius3, Eustaquio M Onorato4, Audrius Aidietis1, Kęstutis Ručinskas1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Due to the recent lack of definitions to establish the severity of paravalvular leak (PVL) and endpoints for its treatment, the effectiveness and safety of a new device for PVL closure have not been comprehensively analyzed. AIM: To analyze a single center's experience of mitral PVL closure in a surgical transapical catheter-based fashion with a purpose-specific device.Entities:
Keywords: heart failure; mitral regurgitation; paravalvular leak; prosthetic heart valve; transcatheter closure
Year: 2018 PMID: 30008769 PMCID: PMC6041841 DOI: 10.5114/aic.2018.76408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej ISSN: 1734-9338 Impact factor: 1.426
Detailed patient clinical characteristics
| Clinical variables | |
|---|---|
| Number of patients | 19 |
| Age [years] | 64 ±7 |
| Gender, male | 11 (58) |
| Presentation, elective | 18 (95) |
| Time since primary procedure [years] | 3.6 (1.1–15) |
| Previous PVL surgical closure | 4 (21) |
| NYHA: | |
| II | 5 (26) |
| III | 11 (58) |
| IV | 3 (16) |
| EuroSCORE II | 5.7 (3.5–9.3) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 4 (20) |
| Hemolysis | 7 (41) |
| Serum LDH concentration [U/l] | 355 (317–584) |
| Serum LDH concentration > 360 U/l | 9 (47) |
| Anemia < 100 g/l | 6 (35) |
| Serum creatinine concentration [μmol/l] | 91 (74–110) |
| Serum creatinine concentration > 200 μmol/l | 1 (5) |
| Glomerular filtration rate: | |
| GFR ml/min | 75 (67–91) |
| GFR < 51 ml/min | 3 (16) |
| GFR < 85 ml/min | 14 (84) |
| Left ventricle function: | |
| Severely abnormal (LVEF < 30%) | 0 (0) |
| Moderately abnormal (30% ≤ LVEF < 45%) | 8 (42) |
| Mildly abnormal (45% ≤ LVEF < 55%) | 2 (11) |
| Good (LVEF ≥ 55%) | 9 (47) |
| Pulmonary artery pressure > 55 mm Hg | 8 (42) |
| Prosthetic valve type: | |
| Bioprosthesis | 3 (16) |
| Mechanical | 14 (74) |
| Annuloplasty ring | 2 (11) |
| Indications for PVL closure: | |
| Hemolytic anemia | 2 (11) |
| Heart failure | 10 (53) |
| Both | 7 (36) |
| Number of PVL per patient: | |
| 1 defect | 15 (63) |
| 2 defects | 3 (16) |
| 3 defects | 1 (5) |
| Degree of PVL regurgitation: | |
| Moderate | 3 (16) |
| Severe | 16 (84) |
EuroSCORE – European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation, GFR – glomerular filtration rate, LDH – lactate dehydrogenase, LVEF – left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA – New York Heart Association heart failure classification system, PVL – paravalvular leak.
Morphological and topographic description of the paravalvular defects
| Paravalvular leak characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Number of PVLs | 24 |
| PVL location: | |
| A1 | 6 (26) |
| A3 | 6 (26) |
| A3/P3 | 1 (4) |
| P1 | 1 (4) |
| P2 | 8 (36) |
| P3 | 2 (8) |
| Complex PVL (defect with suture) | 4 (17) |
| PVL shape: | |
| Crescent | 7 (29) |
| Oval | 17 (71) |
| PVL size [mm]: | |
| Length | 7 (5–10) |
| Width | 4 (4–5) |
PVL – paravalvular leak.
Figure 1Distribution of PVLs along perimeter of mitral valve, presented in clock-like fashion (6). III, VI, IX and XII – hours of the clock; A1, A2, A3, P1, P2, P3 – mitral valve scallops (segments). 1 (4%), 2 (8%), 6 (26%), 8 (35%) – number of defects and percentage in our cohort of patients
Immediate postoperative data and complications
| Clinical variables | |
|---|---|
| Number of patients | 19 |
| Immediate procedural mortality (≤ 72 h after the procedure) | 0 (0) |
| Procedural mortality (all-cause mortality 30 days or in-hospital) | 0 (0) |
| Myocardial infarction (≤ 72 h after the procedure) | 0 (0) |
| Myocardial infarction (within 30 days or in-hospital) | 0 (0) |
| Stroke (within 30 days or during procedure hospitalization) | 0 (0) |
| Acute kidney injury: | |
| Stage 1 (SCrc increased 1.5–2 times baseline) | 2 (11) |
| Stage 2 (SCrc increased 2–3 times baseline) | 3 (16) |
| Stage 3 (SCrc increased > 3 times baseline or RRT) | 0 (0) |
| Bleeding according to BARC: | |
| Life-threatening or disabling bleeding (type 5, 3b and 3c) | 0 (0) |
| Major bleeding (type 3a) | 1 (5) |
| Minor bleeding (type 2 or 3a, depending on the severity) | 1 (5) |
| None | 17 (89) |
| Access site complications: | |
| Major access site complications | 1 (5) |
| Minor access site complications | 0 (0) |
| No access site complications | 18 (95) |
| Conduction disturbances and arrhythmias: | |
| New or worsened cardiac arrhythmia or conduction disturbance | 1 (5) |
| New permanent pacemaker implantation | 0 (0) |
| Surgical revision | 1 (5) |
| Reason for revision: | |
| DSWI | 0 (0) |
| Heart failure | 0 (0) |
| Bleeding | 1 (5) |
| Wound infection | 0 (0) |
| Sepsis | 0 (0) |
| Drainage [ml/day] | 100 (100–200) |
| Prolonged ventilation | 0 (0) |
| Hospital stay [days] | 10 (9–13) |
| Intensive therapy unit stay [days] | 1 (1–1) |
DSWI – deep sternal wound infection, RRT – renal replacement therapy, SCrc – serum creatinine concentration.
Figure 2A – Delivery catheter introduced in to the left ventricle. B – Tourniquets securing the “U” shape sutures at the apex of the heart. C – Entry site of the delivery catheter into the left ventricle. D – “U” shape sutures reinforced with pledgets on the apex of the left ventricle
Figure 3Intraoperative pictures of the PLD occluder in patient with worsened anemia. 1: PLD occluder at the A2 aspect of the mitral valve annulus. A – PLD occluder in situ at the A2 aspect of the mitral valve annulus, B – cuff of the mitral valve prosthesis, C – interatrial septum, D – left atrium. 2: PLD occluder removed. Arrows point to scarce “islands” of epithelium