| Literature DB >> 30008748 |
Chirayu Sa-Uth1, Paweena Rattanasena2, Angsumarn Chandrapatya3, Prapassorn Bussaman1.
Abstract
Xenorhabdus stockiae PB09 bacterium has been shown to exhibit antifungal activity against several plant pathogens. To improve its efficacy, the optimization of the nutritional components in culture media was performed. The medium components that have significant effects on antifungal activity of X. stockiae PB09 were initially identified using a fractional factorial design. Response surface methodology and central composite design were then used to create a model for optimizing the levels of carbon, nitrogen, and mineral sources that maximize antifungal activity of X. stockiae PB09. After that, the suitable carbon, nitrogen, and mineral sources were selected and adjusted by the second-order polynomial regression model, which predicted that 98.62% of antifungal activity could be obtained when the medium contained sucrose, yeast extract, NaCl, and K2HPO4 at 3.24, 23.71, 5.46, and 2.73 g/L, respectively. Laboratory verification of this recipe resulted in the antifungal activity at 97.95% in the shake flask experiment after 48-hour cultivation, which was significantly 27.22% higher than that obtained by using the TSB medium. In addition, X. stockiae PB09 cultured in the verified recipe by using 5 L fermenter could effectively inhibit the mycelial growth of Phytophthora sp., Rhizoctonia solani, Pythium sp., and Fusarium oxysporum. This study demonstrated that the RSM and CCD were shown to be valuable tools for optimizing the culture medium that maximize the antifungal activity of X. stockiae PB09.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30008748 PMCID: PMC6020484 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3965851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Microbiol
Coded levels and real values for the experimental design and results of FFD.
| Run |
|
|
| Mycelial inhibition (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed | Predicted | ||||
| 1 | −1 (1) | −1 (16) | −1 (5.5) | 60.67 | 62.57 |
| 2 | +1 (4) | −1 (16) | −1 (5.5) | 70.67 | 69.67 |
| 3 | −1 (1) | +1 (24) | −1 (5.5) | 75.27 | 73.97 |
| 4 | +1 (4) | +1 (24) | −1 (5.5) | 80.67 | 81.07 |
| 5 | −1 (1) | −1 (16) | +1 (9.5) | 65.27 | 67.80 |
| 6 | +1 (4) | −1 (16) | +1 (9.5) | 78.33 | 74.90 |
| 7 | −1 (1) | +1 (24) | +1 (9.5) | 82.33 | 79.20 |
| 8 | +1 (4) | +1 (24) | +1 (9.5) | 82.27 | 86.30 |
| 9 | 0 (2.5) | 0 (20) | 0 (7.5) | 76.34 | 78.35 |
| 10 | 0 (2.5) | 0 (20) | 0 (7.5) | 80.27 | 78.35 |
| 11 | 0 (2.5) | 0 (20) | 0 (7.5) | 79.45 | 78.35 |
| 12 | 0 (2.5) | 0 (20) | 0 (7.5) | 77.33 | 78.35 |
FFD regression results for antifungal activity.
| Variables | Regression analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient |
| Significant level | |
| Intercept | 74.44 | 15.99 | 0.0016 |
|
| 3.55 | 11.64 | 0.0113 |
|
| 5.70 | 30.00 | 0.0009 |
|
| 2.61 | 6.31 | 0.0402 |
R 2 = 0.8725; significant at P value less than 0.05.
Steepest ascent experiment design.
| Run Δ |
|
|
| Mycelial inhibition (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step length | 0.3 | 1.4 | 0.3 | |
| Base point | 2.5 | 20.0 | 7.5 | 76.50 |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Number 1 | 2.8 | 21.4 | 7.8 | 79.17 |
| Number 2 | 3.1 | 22.8 | 8.1 | 90.50 |
| Number 3 | 3.4 | 24.2 | 8.4 | 81.67 |
| Number 4 | 3.7 | 25.6 | 8.7 | 67.50 |
| Number 5 | 4.0 | 27.0 | 9.0 | 42.50 |
Experimental ranges and levels of the independent variables.
| Variable | Parameter | Ranges and levels | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1.68 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 1.68 | ||
|
| Sucrose (g/L) | 2.60 | 2.80 | 3.10 | 3.40 | 3.60 |
|
| Yeast extract (g/L) | 20.45 | 21.40 | 22.80 | 24.20 | 25.15 |
|
| Mineral (g/L) | 7.60 | 7.80 | 8.10 | 8.40 | 8.60 |
Effect of different media on biomass and antifungal activity of X. stockiae PB09 against Phytophthora sp. after cultivation by using shake flasks at different periods of time.
| Media | Biomass (g, dry cell weight/L ± SD) | Mycelial inhibition (%, mean ± SD) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | |
| TSB | 9.78 ± 0.16a | 11.90 ± 0.43a | 11.79 ± 0.14a | 63.18 ± 4.03a | 70.73 ± 1.48a | 70.73 ± 2.57a |
| LB | 8.14 ± 0.11b | 10.12 ± 0.11b | 9.95 ± 0.11b | 65.00 ± 6.01a | 66.55 ± 2.29b | 69.09 ± 2.57ab |
| YSG | 7.08 ± 0.10c | 9.58 ± 0.20c | 9.02 ± 0.18c | 49.09 ± 2.97b | 65.45 ± 5.35b | 68.18 ± 5.65b |
Means within the same column followed by the same lowercase letters are not significantly different (P < 0.05) as compared by the LSD test.
Figure 1Effect of various carbon (a) and nitrogen (b) sources in the TSB medium on antifungal activity of X. stockiae PB09.
Central composite design of the three variables and their corresponding experimental data.
| Run |
|
|
| Mycelial inhibition (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed | Predicted | ||||
| 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 78.32 | 75.15 |
| 2 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 76.38 | 77.30 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 81.06 | 80.25 |
| 4 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 93.73 | 91.41 |
| 5 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 81.67 | 82.03 |
| 6 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 82.86 | 81.71 |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 89.46 | 86.58 |
| 8 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 94.07 | 95.28 |
| 9 | −1.68 | 0 | 0 | 76.46 | 79.38 |
| 10 | 1.68 | 0 | 0 | 88.63 | 88.49 |
| 11 | 0 | −1.68 | 0 | 74.98 | 75.84 |
| 12 | 0 | 1.68 | 0 | 89.63 | 91.54 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | −1.68 | 78.86 | 81.12 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 1.68 | 89.64 | 90.16 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 92.48 | 96.06 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 97.67 | 96.06 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 97.86 | 96.06 |
| 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 96.16 | 96.06 |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 94.03 | 96.06 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 98.65 | 96.06 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the quadratic model.
| Source | SS | DF | MS |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 1155.73 | 9 | 128.41 | 16.93 | <0.0001 |
|
| 100.23 | 1 | 100.23 | 13.21 | 0.0046 |
|
| 297.38 | 1 | 297.38 | 39.20 | <0.0001 |
|
| 98.62 | 1 | 98.62 | 13.00 | 0.0048 |
|
| 40.64 | 1 | 40.64 | 5.36 | 0.0432 |
|
| 3.04 | 1 | 3.04 | 0.40 | 0.5410 |
|
| 0.15 | 1 | 0.15 | 0.020 | 0.8915 |
|
| 265.10 | 1 | 265.10 | 34.95 | 0.0001 |
|
| 275.69 | 1 | 275.69 | 36.34 | 0.0001 |
|
| 195.82 | 1 | 195.82 | 25.81 | 0.0005 |
| Residual | 75.86 | 10 | 7.59 | ||
| Lack of fit | 46.41 | 5 | 9.28 | 1.58 | 0.3149 |
| Pure error | 29.45 | 5 | 5.89 | ||
| Total | 1231.59 | 19 |
R 2 = 0.9384; significant at P value less than 0.05.
Figure 2Normal plot of the residuals.
Figure 3Response surface plots of the antifungal activity of X. stockiae PB09: (a) the effects of sucrose and yeast extract on antifungal activity; (b) the effects of sucrose and mineral on antifungal activity; (c) the effects of yeast extract and mineral on antifungal activity.
Figure 4Antifungal activity of X. stockiae PB09 in the original medium and optimized medium.
Figure 5Levels of dry cell weight (DCW) and antifungal activity of X. stockiae PB09 in the optimized medium. The error bars in the figure indicate the standard deviations from three replicates.