| Literature DB >> 30006616 |
Qiong Gong1, Peng Zhu1, Binhao Zhang1, Chang Shu1, Zeyang Ding1, Jingjing Wu1, Bixiang Zhang2, Xiao-Ping Chen3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is reported that lipid emulsion enriched in n-3 fatty acids (FAs) helps us to improve postoperative recovery for surgical patients with biliary tract disease. Its role for postoperative patients with obstructive jaundice is as yet unclear. The object of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of n-3 fatty acid-based parenteral nutrition (PN) for patients with obstructive jaundice following surgical procedures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30006616 PMCID: PMC6085574 DOI: 10.1038/s41430-018-0256-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr ISSN: 0954-3007 Impact factor: 4.016
Fig. 1Flow chart of cohort (It shows the process of screening the patients treated or untreated with n-3 FA in the initial and final propensity score matched sample. We screened a total of 827 patients with obstructive jaundice in Tongji Hospital between May 2014 and June 2017. Finally, 108 cases were enrolled into the PSM cohort for the last statistical calculation)
Demographic and clinical characteristics
| Characteristic pre-operation | Before matched | After matched | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-3 fatty group ( | Control group ( | N-3 fatty group ( | Control group ( | |||
| Age (years) | 58.1 ± 11.2 | 55.7 ± 12 | 0.213 | 56.9 ± 12.4 | 57.4 ± 11.3 | 0.846 |
| Male sex No. (%) | 36(15.9) | 70(31) | 0.889 | 62(58.4) | 86(71.7) | 0.244 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.3 ± 2.7 | 22.1 ± 2.9 | 0.027 | 21.7 ± 2.7 | 21.7 ± 3 | 0.933 |
| MNA | 7.7 ± 1.1 | 7.5 ± 0.9 | <0.001 | 4.1 ± 0.9 | 3.9 ± 1 | 0.253 |
| NRI | 90.9 ± 10.8 | 91.7 ± 10.7 | 0.694 | 91.2 ± 7.5 | 90.4 ± 11.3 | 0.672 |
| Child-Pugh score(%) | 0.154 | 1 | ||||
| 6–7 | 8(6.6) | 6(5.6) | 2(3.7) | 2(3.7) | ||
| 8–10 | 108(90) | 100(94.4) | 52(96.3) | 52(96.3) | ||
| >10 | 4(3.4) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | ||
| Weight loss (kg)a | 4.08 ± 3.65 | 2.76 ± 3.10 | 0.26 | 2.8 ± 3 | 3.1 ± 3.6 | 0.567 |
| WBC ( × 10^9 / L) | 7.97 ± 4.4 | 6.73 ± 2.87 | 0.015 | 7.48 ± 3.91 | 7.32 ± 3.14 | 0.821 |
| ALT(U/L) | 147 ± 150 | 104 ± 109 | 0.017 | 103 ± 87 | 114 ± 109 | 0.549 |
| AST(U/L) | 129 ± 129 | 106 ± 81 | <0.001 | 77 ± 42 | 91 ± 62 | 0.176 |
| TP(g/L) | 64 ± 8.3 | 64 ± 5.7 | 0.46 | 63.1 ± 7.1 | 64.3 ± 6 | 0.352 |
| ALB(g/L) | 34.7 ± 6.7 | 34.2 ± 5.4 | 0.587 | 33.8 ± 4.5 | 33.6 ± 4.3 | 0.846 |
| PALB (mg/L) | 117 ± 56 | 123 ± 38 | 0.366 | 115 ± 48 | 116 ± 41 | 0.905 |
| TBIL (µmol/L) | 197.2 ± 170.4 | 192 ± 111.5 | 0.788 | 176.1 ± 147.8 | 179.8 ± 118.8 | 0.886 |
| DBIL(µmol/L) | 158.8 ± 103.1 | 149.2 ± 123.8 | 0.524 | 151.5 ± 109.6 | 161.3 ± 127.3 | 0.669 |
| BUN(µmol/L) | 4.48 ± 2.23 | 4.3 ± 2.12 | 0.535 | 4.4 ± 2.2 | 4.1 ± 2.3 | 0.462 |
| UA(μmol/L) | 177.8 ± 72.7 | 170.4 ± 66.4 | 0.434 | 180 ± 62 | 180 ± 72 | 0.984 |
Data are means ± standard deviations or number (%) unless otherwise indicated
aWeight loss = usual weight−weight on inclusion
Comparison of treatments between patients with n-3 FA group and control group
| Before matched | After matched | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| treatments | N-3 fatty group ( | Control group ( | N-3 fatty group ( | Control group ( | ||
| Surgical procedures | <0.001 | 0.169 | ||||
| PTCDa | 28(26.4) | 70(58.3) | 24(44.4) | 22(40.8) | ||
| ENBDb | 4(3.8) | 2(1.6) | 2(3.6) | 2(3.7) | ||
| LC or LBDEc | 22(20.7) | 10(8.4) | 6(11.1) | 6(11.1) | ||
| CBDEd | 12(11.3) | 4(3.3) | 4(7.4) | 5(9.3) | ||
| OCTDe | 12(11.3) | 22(18.3) | 13(24) | 8(14.8) | ||
| Bypass surgery | 2(1.9) | 2(1.7) | 2(3.6) | 2(3.7) | ||
| 26(24.5) | 10(8.4) | 3(5.5) | 9(16.7) | |||
| Anastomotic methods | <0.001 | 0.926 | ||||
| PTCD ± ENBD | 32(30.2) | 72(60) | 26(48.2) | 24(44.4) | ||
| External drainage surgery | 34(32) | 14(11.7) | 10(18.5) | 11(30.4) | ||
| Bypass surgery | 40(37.8) | 34(28.3) | 18(33.3) | 19(35.2) | ||
PTCD percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage, ENBD bendoscopic nasobiliary drainage, LC laparoscopic cholecystectomy, LBDE laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, CBDE laparotomy common bile duct exploration, OCTD open choledochotomy T-tube drainage, PD bypass surgery and pancreaticoduodenectomy
Fig. 2The differences of inflammatory reaction between two groups after operation. There were no differences in WBC or GRAN between two groups (P = 0.943, P = 0.410), respectively
Fig. 3During the postoperative period, patients in the n-3 group had rapid jaundice recovery (a) (P = 0.045), shorter duration of the jaundice recovery (b) (P = 0.029), lower cholesterol (c) (P = 0.045) and higher pre-albumin (d) (P = 0.002),