| Literature DB >> 30006549 |
Zhaojin Chen1, Jian Yuan2, Feng Sun2, Fei Zhang2, Yan Chen3, Chuanyu Ding2, Jianwei Shi4, Yuying Li5, Lunguang Yao6.
Abstract
Planktonic fungi are important components of aquatic ecosystems, and analyses of their community composition and function have far-reaching significance for the ecological management and maintenance of reservoir environments. However, few studies have investigated the composition, distribution, and function of planktonic fungi in reservoir ecosystems and their relationship with water quality. Here, the composition of the planktonic fungal community in the surface water layer of the Danjiangkou Reservoir is investigated using Illumina MiSeq sequencing. According to the results, the reservoir community is primarily composed of 7 phyla, including Ascomycota, Rozellomycota, Basidiomycota, Chytridiomycota, and Zygomycota, comprising 294 genera, demonstrating the rich diversity of this community. Redundancy analysis (RDA) of the planktonic fungal community and environmental factors showed dissolved oxygen (DO), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen (TN), chlorophyll a (Chl a), and permanganate (CODMn) to be important factors influencing the distribution of planktonic fungi. Spearman correlation analysis of the planktonic fungal community composition and diversity indices with physical and chemical water quality parameters showed that the impacts of TN, COD and DO were the most significant. The results of this study on the planktonic fungal community in the Danjiangkou Reservoir area using high-throughput sequencing revealed that the community is sensitive to water quality parameters. This result provides a reference for studying the composition and distribution of the planktonic fungal community in Danjiangkou Reservoir and its role in the biogeochemical cycle.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30006549 PMCID: PMC6045663 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-28903-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Locations of the five sampling stations in the Danjiangkou Reservoir and the water conveyance canal of Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project (MR-SNWDP) in China. Station codes represent the first letter of the station’s name: K: Kuxin, Q: Qushou, S: Songgan, H: Heijizuo, T: Taizishan. The map was generated using ArcGIS 10.0 (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA: http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis).
Main physicochemical characteristics and trophic level index (TLI) of water samples (means ± S.E.).
| Station | T (°C) | pH | DO (mg/L) | SD (m) | CODMn (mg/L) | COD (mg/L) | TP (mg/L) | TN (mg/L) | NH4-N (mg/L) | NO3-N (mg/L) | Chl a (mg/m3) | TLI | Trophic state | Water quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K | 16.60 ± 0.36 | 8.47 ± 0.14b | 8.69 ± 0.07ab | 5.000 ± 0.020e | 3.200 ± 0.100a | 14.30 ± 0.27d | 0.013 ± 0.006ab | 0.947 ± 0.032c | 0.030 ± 0.003a | 0.76 ± 0.05c | 0.50 ± 0.02ab | 28.16 | Oligotrophic | Excellence |
| Q | 16.87 ± 0.65 | 8.47 ± 0.08b | 9.77 ± 0.14c | 2.997 ± 0.006b | 3.767 ± 0.058c | 11.37 ± 0.40ab | 0.023 ± 0.006b | 0.907 ± 0.012b | 0.053 ± 0.003b | 0.70 ± 0.02b | 0.60 ± 0.02b | 33.00 | Mesotrophic | Good |
| S | 16.68 ± 0.55 | 8.64 ± 0.09c | 8.49 ± 0.06a | 2.900 ± 0.007a | 3.433 ± 0.058b | 12.13 ± 0.60bc | 0.023 ± 0.006b | 1.013 ± 0.006d | 0.146 ± 0.005d | 0.51 ± 0.03a | 0.42 ± 0.02a | 31.97 | Mesotrophic | Good |
| H | 16.71 ± 0.90 | 8.21 ± 0.04a | 9.57 ± 0.25c | 4.297 ± 0.006d | 3.200 ± 0.025b | 11.27 ± 0.42a | 0.010 ± 0.04a | 0.780 ± 0.030a | 0.021 ± 0.001a | 0.66 ± 0.02b | 0.56 ± 0.02b | 28.52 | Oligotrophic | Excellence |
| T | 17.35 ± 0.40 | 8.46 ± 0.02b | 8.79 ± 0.17b | 4.203 ± 0.006c | 4.433 ± 0.058e | 12.73 ± 0.40c | 0.023 ± 0.006b | 1.213 ± 0.006e | 0.069 ± 0.009c | 1.07 ± 0.01d | 1.21 ± 0.14c | 35.41 | Mesotrophic | Good |
Means within the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05, as based on one-way ANOVA.
MiSeq sequencing results and diversity estimates for each sampling site (means ± S.E.).
| Station | Reads | OTUs | Shannon | Simpson | Ace | Chao1 | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K | 36600 ± 5400 | 241 ± 40b | 1.74 ± 0.47ab | 0.48 ± 0.14b | 338.34 ± 37.60ab | 301.27 ± 15.46b | 99.81 ± 0.040a |
| Q | 38948 ± 4613 | 424 ± 65d | 2.86 ± 0.26 cd | 0.15 ± 0.04a | 477.61 ± 61.33c | 467.02 ± 61.10c | 99.80 ± 0.020a |
| S | 33877 ± 2472 | 286 ± 66bc | 2.35 ± 0.43bc | 0.30 ± 0.09a | 321.03 ± 54.87ab | 311.89 ± 57.51b | 99.85 ± 0.040ab |
| H | 35713 ± 1675 | 381 ± 55 cd | 3.12 ± 0.49d | 0.15 ± 0.07a | 419.23 ± 37.99bc | 407.90 ± 44.53c | 99.83 ± 0.030ab |
| T | 40245 ± 4624 | 117 ± 20a | 1.54 ± 0.04a | 0.29 ± 0.01a | 247.24 ± 66.04a | 185.15 ± 40.27a | 99.88 ± 0.030b |
Means within the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05, as based on one-way ANOVA.
Figure 2Rarefaction curves base on pyrosequencing of planktonic fungal communities.
Figure 3PCoA plot of the samples using the unweighted UniFrac distance metric.
Figure 4Relative abundance of planktonic fungal sequences at the phylum (a) class (b) order (c) family (d) and genus (e) levels.
Figure 5RDA of planktonic fungal communities and physicochemical water quality parameters.
Spearman correlation analysis between community richness and diversity indices and physicochemical water quality parameters.
| OTUs | Shannon | Simpson | Ace | Chao1 | Coverage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO3-N | −0.525* | −0.625* | 0.346 | −0.328 | −0.453 | 0.038 |
| Chla | −0.136 | −0.109 | −0.282 | −0.023 | −0.105 | 0.138 |
| T | −0.246 | −0.096 | −0.221 | −0.239 | −0.275 | 0.546* |
| pH | −0.245 | −0.270 | 0.375 | −0.424 | −0.325 | 0.259 |
| DO | 0.517* | 0.515* | −0.701** | 0.597* | 0.559* | −0.279 |
| CODMn | −0.282 | −0.228 | −0.137 | −0.309 | −0.305 | 0.313 |
| COD | −0.818** | −0.882** | 0.918** | −0.775** | −0.800** | 0.014 |
| TN | −0.732** | −0.680** | 0.496 | −0.774** | −0.774** | 0.521* |
| NH4-N | −0.313 | −0.307 | 0.229 | −0.433 | −0.377 | 0.449 |
| TP | −0.338 | −0.320 | 0.047 | −0.334 | −0.315 | 0.175 |
*Indicates significant differences (P < 0.05).
**Indicates extremely significant differences (P < 0.01).
Figure 6Heat map and hierarchical clustering tree of Spearman correlation analysis of planktonic fungal families and physicochemical water quality parameters.