| Literature DB >> 30005641 |
Ayodeji Olayemi1, Akinlabi Oyeyiola2, Adeoba Obadare2, Joseph Igbokwe3, Adetunji Samuel Adesina4, Francis Onwe5, Kingsley Nnanna Ukwaja6, Nnennaya Anthony Ajayi6, Toni Rieger7, Stephan Günther7, Elisabeth Fichet-Calvet7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lassa fever, killing thousands of people annually, is the most reported viral zoonotic disease in Nigeria. Recently, different rodent species carrying diverse lineages of the Lassa virus (LASV) in addition to a novel Mobala-like genetic sequence were detected within the country. Here, screening 906 small mammal specimens from 11 localities for IgG antibodies and incorporating previous PCR detection data involving the same populations, we further describe arenavirus prevalence across Nigeria in relation to host species and geographical location.Entities:
Keywords: Host; Lassa fever; Rodents; Serology; Zoonotic virus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30005641 PMCID: PMC6045851 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-2991-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Map of Nigeria showing small mammals that tested arenavirus-positive according to locality. PCR-positive species are in red (indicating Lassa virus) and purple (representing a Mobala-like virus). IgG-positive species are in green. Red dots indicate localities within the endemic Lassa fever zone and black dots mark those outside the endemic zone
Small mammals trapped during the study with number of arenavirus-positive individuals (PCR-positive/IgG-positive). For Mastomys erythroleucus and M. natalensis additional numbers in parentheses indicate (PCR percentage prevalence/IgG percentage prevalence)
| Non endemic zone for Lassa fever | Endemic zone for Lassa fever | Total | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abagboro | Ilobu | Kako | Esira | Eguare Egoro | Ekpoma | Abakaliki | Ndubia | Onmba Abena | Mayo Ranewo | Ngel Nyaki | ||
| Rodentia | ||||||||||||
| | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||
| | 1 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||
| | 12 | 12 | ||||||||||
| | 3 | 2 (1/-) | 5 | |||||||||
| | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||
| | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |||||||
| | 2 (-/1) (- /50%) | 31 | 20 (-/3) (- /15%) | 63 (3/11) (5%/18%) | 116 | |||||||
| | 99 (-/1) (- /1%) | 7 | 13 | 29 (6/5) (21%/17%) | 36 (9/13) (25%/36%) | 34 | 31 (1a/16) (3%/52%) | 24 (-/5) (- /21%) | 273 | |||
| | 6 | 5 (-/4) | 4 (-/1) | 15 | ||||||||
| | 12 | 1 | 1 | 3 (-/1) | 2 | 19 | ||||||
| | 5 | 4 | 9 | |||||||||
| | 6 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 17 | |||||||
| | 12 | 2 | 126 (-/4) | 47 (-/2) | 187 | |||||||
| | 16 | 16 | ||||||||||
| | 1 (-/1) | 1 | ||||||||||
| | 3 (-/1) | 1 | 3 (-/1) | 3 | 4 | 6 | 20 | |||||
| | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Insectivora | ||||||||||||
| | 14 | 4 | 3 | 19 | 69 (-/2) | 24 | 29 | 32 | 4 | 1 | 199 | |
| | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Total | 153 | 8 | 27 | 20 | 180 | 163 | 58 | 58 | 158 | 39 | 42 | 906 |
aPCR-positive results in all cases represent LASV infection except in Mayo Ranewo, where M. natalensis was PCR-positive for a Mobala-like arenavirus
Adapted from [2, 14, 20]
Probability values (P) from statistical comparison by logistic regression of arenavirus prevalence in M. natalensis in Eguare Egoro and Ekpoma (EKP)
| Variable | PCR prevalence | IgG prevalence | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Estimate |
| Estimate |
| |
| (Intercept) | -3.1733 | 0.318 | -1.8615 | 0.527 | |
| Age (eye lens weight in mg) | 1 | 1.6387 | 0.488 | 0.3608 | 0.869 |
| Locality (EKP) | 1 | -1.2167 | 0.313 | 0.8444 | 0.351 |
| Season (rainy) | 1 | -0.7367 | 0.445 | -0.3942 | 0.694 |
| Locality (EKP) × season (rainy) | 1 | 2.3431 | 0.116 | 0.3912 | 0.755 |
Fig. 2PCR and IgG prevalence in Mastomys natalensis (a) and M. erythroleucus (b) according to season (with 95% confidence intervals)
Fig. 3Arenavirus infection status by sex and age category in Mastomys populations that were sampled longitudinally. White bars represent IgG-negative individuals, green bars IgG-positive individuals, and red crosses indicate the number of LASV PCR-positive individuals in a particular age category. Age categories are represented by eye lens weight in milligrams on the dependent axes. Bars to the left of each independent axis represent female individuals, those on the right represent male individuals. Each pyramid was scaled so that the surface area of the bars total 100 %