| Literature DB >> 25900417 |
François Jacquet1, Christiane Denys2, Erik Verheyen3,4, Josef Bryja5,6, Rainer Hutterer7, Julian C Kerbis Peterhans8,9, William T Stanley10, Steven M Goodman11,12, Arnaud Couloux13, Marc Colyn14, Violaine Nicolas15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aims to reconstruct the evolutionary history of African shrews referred to the Crocidura olivieri complex. We tested the respective role of forest retraction/expansion during the Pleistocene, rivers (allopatric models), ecological gradients (parapatric model) and anthropogenic factors in explaining the distribution and diversification within this species complex. We sequenced three mitochondrial and four nuclear markers from 565 specimens encompassing the known distribution of the complex, i.e. from Morocco to Egypt and south to Mozambique. We used Bayesian phylogenetic inference, genetic structure analyses and divergence time estimates to assess the phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of these animals.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25900417 PMCID: PMC4422046 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-015-0344-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Sampling points and clade distributions. Map of sampling points showing the distribution of the phylogenetic clades identified in the Bayesian phylogenetic analyses: 8 main clades of the clade VII: C. somalica and clade VIII: C. hera complex (a), subclades within clade I (1b), subclades within clade IV (c) and subclades within clade V (d). Ecological divisions based on White’s (1981) vegetation map. See Additional file 6 for localities names and GPS coordinates.
Figure 2Phylogenetic tree of the Crocidura olivieri complex. Final phylogenetic tree for members of the Crocidura olivieri complex using one specimen per locality and per clade, with 156 individual specimens. Tree built using Bayesian Inference and data from three mitochondrial (16S, cytb and COI) and four nuclear markers (BRCA1, STAT5A, HDAC2 and RIOK3) for a combined total of 5305 bp. Values above branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities. The branchlets are identified by specimen numbers defined in Additional file 6. A simplified representation of the tree is shown in the upper framed window (Sgl = singleton).
Genetic distances within the complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [0.6-2.1] | [0.9-3.0] | [1.2-3.4] | [2.9-5.2] | [3.2-4.7] | [3.5-5.6] | [3.0-4.2] | |
| II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1.0-2.7] |
| [1.1-3.0] | [1.5-3.5] | [2.8-5.8] | [3.0-5.2] | [4.1-5.5] | [3.0-4.7] | |
| III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1.0-3.6] | [1.5-4.2] |
| [1.6-3.4] | [3.1-5.2] | [3.5-5.3] | [3.6-6.8] | [3.1-4.6] | |
| IV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1.5-4.2] | [2.1-4.3] | [1.6-4.2] |
| [3.3-5.4] | [3.5-5.4] | [4.1-5.6] | [3.2-4.5] | |
| V |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [3.5-5.7] | [3.9-6.6] | [3.5-6.0] | [3.5-6.0] |
| [4.1-5.8] | [4.2-5.6] | [4.1-5.6] | |
| VI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [3.5-5.6] | [4.0-5.7] | [4.0-6.4] | [3.9-6.6] | [4.0-6.2] |
| [3.6-4.4] | [3.9-4.3] | |
| VII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [3.4-5.2] | [4.0-5.2] | [3.4-6.4] | [3.9-5.3] | [4.0-5.2] | [3.4-4.1] |
| [3.4-3.9] | |
| VIII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [2.3-5.1] | [3.8-5.0] | [3.3-5.9] | [3.3-5.3] | [3.9-5.4] | [3.8-5.1] | [3.2-3.8] |
| |
|
| ||||||||
| I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1.4-3.4] | [0.5-3.7] | [1.6-4.6] | [1.6-6] | [3.8-5.7] | [3.3-5.8] | [3.8-5.3] | |
| II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1.4-3.3] |
| [1.2-3.0] | [1.6-4.1] | [3.5-5.2] | [4.0-4.8] | [3.6-4.8] | [4.0-5.2] | |
| III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1.4-3.6] | [1.2-2.9] |
| [1.6-3.8] | [3.5-4.9] | [3.5-4.0] | [3.1-4.3] | [3.8-4.5] | |
| IV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1.5-5.8] | [1.5-4.9] | [1.7-4.9] |
| [3.0-6.0] | [3.5-5.0] | [3.0-4.8] | [3.3-5.5] | |
| V |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [3.5-5.7] | [3.4-4.9] | [3.4-4.7] | [3.1-5.7] |
| [4.0-5.1] | [3.8-5.0] | [3.7-5.1] | |
| VI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [3.5-5.6] | [3.4-4.9] | [3.4-4.6] | [2.9-5.4] | [3.8-4.8] |
| [2.0-2.2] | [4.1-4.1] | |
| VII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [3.2-5.5] | [3.5-4.6] | [3.0-4.1] | [2.9-4.6] | [3.8-4.8] | [2.0-4.6] |
| ||
| VIII |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [3.7-5.1] | [3.8-4.9] | [3.7-4.3] | [3.2-5.2] | [3.5-4.9] | [3.8-4.4] |
| ||
Genetic distances (K2P above and uncorrected p-distances below diagonal) between and within clades of the C. olivieri complex for cytb (1a) and COI markers (1b) with mean and range within brackets.
Figure 3Datation tree of the Crocidura olivieri complex. Dating tree built using data of the three mitochondrial markers (16S, cytb and COI) based on 2403 bp and Bayesian Inference under a Yule model of speciation and a log-normal relaxed molecular clock model. a) Complete tree showing the four fossil calibration points used as time constraints: oldest record of Crocidura (*), oldest Otisorex (**), oldest Cryptotis (***), oldest recorded Myosoricinae-Crocidurinae (****) and split between Soricinae and Crocidurinae-Myosoricinae (*****). b) Focus on the C. olivieri complex with notations at nodes of Bayesian posterior probabilities (above line) and estimated times of divergence and credibility intervals within brackets (below line).
Genetic structure indices within the complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| I | 90 | 115 | 59 | 0.969 | 0.447 | 9.426 |
|
|
| −2.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| II | 17 | 37 | 11 | 0.882 | 0.473 | 9.868 |
|
|
| 0.37 | 0.17 | 0.62 | −0.40 |
|
|
| ss = 0.06 |
| ||||||||||
| III | 17 | 56 | 14 | 0.978 | 0.783 | 16.63 |
|
|
| 0.15 | 0.13 | −1.41 | 0.017 |
|
|
| ss = 0.93 |
| ||||||||||
| IV | 95 | 276 | 72 | 0.991 | 1.584 | 33.87 |
|
|
| −1.06 | −1.42 |
| −1.25 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| V | 37 | 158 | 33 | 0.993 | 0.911 | 19.72 |
|
|
|
|
| − |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| VI | 11 | 19 | 4 | 0.673 | 0.296 | 6.582 | 0.009 | - |
| −0.40 | −0.32 | 4.35 | 0.07 |
|
|
| ss = 0.06 |
| ||||||||||
Genetic diversity, mismatch distributions and neutrality estimates for the main clades of members of the C. olivieri complex identified in the phylogenetic analyses based on three combined mitochondrial markers (16S, cytb and COI). Data include number of specimens (N), number of polymorphic sites (Np), number of distinct haplotypes (Nh), haplotype diversity (Hd), nucleotide diversity (Pi, expressed as percentages, i.e. 0.001 = 0.1%) and average number of pairwise nucleotide differences (k). Values indicating a signal of demographic or range expansion are in bold (P-value = P < 0.05; ss = Strobeck’s statistic > 0.95 for Fu’s Fs test). Tau is the mode of the curve of the mismatch distribution when a signal of demographic expansion is detected. It is proportional to the time since expansion. Clades VII and VIII are not included owing to a low number of specimens (n = 2 and n = 3, respectively).