Hana Lee1, Xiaotian K Wu1, Becky L Genberg2, Michael J Mugavero3, Stephen R Cole4, Bryan Lau2, Joseph W Hogan1. 1. Department of Biostatistics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 4. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Studies examining engagement in HIV care often capture cross-sectional patient status to estimate retention and identify predictors of attrition, which ignore longitudinal patient care-seeking behaviors. We describe the cyclical nature of (dis)engagement and re-entry into HIV care using the state transition framework. DESIGN: We represent the dynamic patterns of patient care-retention using five states: engaged in care, missed one, two, three, or more expected visits, and deceased. Then we describe various care-seeking behaviors in terms of transitioning from one state to another (e.g. from disengaged to engaged). This analysis includes 31 009 patients enrolled in the Center for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Systems (CNICS) in the United States from 1996 to 2014. METHOD: Multistate models for longitudinal data were used to identify barriers to retention and subgroups at higher risk of falling out of care. RESULTS: The initial 2 years following primary engagement in care were a crucial time for improving retention. Patients who had not initiated antiretroviral therapy, with lower CD4 cell counts, higher viral load, or not having an AIDS-defining illness were less likely to be retained in care. CONCLUSION: Beyond the individual patient characteristics typically used to characterize retention in HIV care, we identified specific periods of time and points in the care continuum associated with elevated risk of transitioning out of care. Our findings can contribute to evidence-based recommendations to enhance long-term retention in CNICS. This approach can also be applied to other cohort data to identify retention strategies tailored to each population.
OBJECTIVES: Studies examining engagement in HIV care often capture cross-sectional patient status to estimate retention and identify predictors of attrition, which ignore longitudinal patient care-seeking behaviors. We describe the cyclical nature of (dis)engagement and re-entry into HIV care using the state transition framework. DESIGN: We represent the dynamic patterns of patient care-retention using five states: engaged in care, missed one, two, three, or more expected visits, and deceased. Then we describe various care-seeking behaviors in terms of transitioning from one state to another (e.g. from disengaged to engaged). This analysis includes 31 009 patients enrolled in the Center for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Systems (CNICS) in the United States from 1996 to 2014. METHOD: Multistate models for longitudinal data were used to identify barriers to retention and subgroups at higher risk of falling out of care. RESULTS: The initial 2 years following primary engagement in care were a crucial time for improving retention. Patients who had not initiated antiretroviral therapy, with lower CD4 cell counts, higher viral load, or not having an AIDS-defining illness were less likely to be retained in care. CONCLUSION: Beyond the individual patient characteristics typically used to characterize retention in HIV care, we identified specific periods of time and points in the care continuum associated with elevated risk of transitioning out of care. Our findings can contribute to evidence-based recommendations to enhance long-term retention in CNICS. This approach can also be applied to other cohort data to identify retention strategies tailored to each population.
Authors: W K Poole; R Perritt; K B Shah; Y Lou; J Turner; P Kvale; P C Hopewell; J Glassroth; M Rosen; L Reichman; J Wallace Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Peter Rebeiro; Keri N Althoff; Kate Buchacz; John Gill; Michael Horberg; Hartmut Krentz; Richard Moore; Timothy R Sterling; John T Brooks; Kelly A Gebo; Robert Hogg; Marina Klein; Jeffrey Martin; Michael Mugavero; Sean Rourke; Michael J Silverberg; Jennifer Thorne; Stephen J Gange Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Kimberly B Ulett; James H Willig; Hui-Yi Lin; Justin S Routman; Sarah Abroms; Jeroan Allison; Ashlee Chatham; James L Raper; Michael S Saag; Michael J Mugavero Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Jennifer Gillis; Mona Loutfy; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Tony Antoniou; Ann N Burchell; Sharon Walmsley; Curtis Cooper; Marina B Klein; Nima Machouf; Julio S G Montaner; Sean B Rourke; Christos Tsoukas; Robert Hogg; Janet Raboud Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Tomasz Oliwa; Brian Furner; Jessica Schmitt; John Schneider; Jessica P Ridgway Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Paul Y Wada; Ahra Kim; Karu Jayathilake; Stephany N Duda; Yao Abo; Keri N Althoff; Morna Cornell; Beverly Musick; Steve Brown; Annette H Sohn; Yu Jiun Chan; Kara K Wools-Kaloustian; Denis Nash; Constantin T Yiannoutsos; Carina Cesar; Catherine C McGowan; Peter F Rebeiro Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2022-08-26 Impact factor: 5.944
Authors: Seth C Kalichman; Harold Katner; Ellen Banas; Marnie Hill; Moira O Kalichman Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Arthi Ramachandran; Avishek Kumar; Hannes Koenig; Adolfo De Unanue; Christina Sung; Joe Walsh; John Schneider; Rayid Ghani; Jessica P Ridgway Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 4.379