Literature DB >> 33948789

Novel Longitudinal Methods for Assessing Retention in Care: a Synthetic Review.

Aaloke Mody1, Khai Hoan Tram2, David V Glidden3, Ingrid Eshun-Wilson2, Kombatende Sikombe4,5, Megha Mehrotra3, Jake M Pry2,4, Elvin H Geng2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Retention in care is both dynamic and longitudinal in nature, but current approaches to retention often reduce these complex histories into cross-sectional metrics that obscure the nuanced experiences of patients receiving HIV care. In this review, we discuss contemporary approaches to assessing retention in care that captures its dynamic nature and the methodological and data considerations to do so. RECENT
FINDINGS: Enhancing retention measurements either through patient tracing or "big data" approaches (including probabilistic matching) to link databases from different sources can be used to assess longitudinal retention from the perspective of the patient when they transition in and out of care and access care at different facilities. Novel longitudinal analytic approaches such as multi-state and group-based trajectory analyses are designed specifically for assessing metrics that can change over time such as retention in care. Multi-state analyses capture the transitions individuals make in between different retention states over time and provide a comprehensive depiction of longitudinal population-level outcomes. Group-based trajectory analyses can identify patient subgroups that follow distinctive retention trajectories over time and highlight the heterogeneity of retention patterns across the population. Emerging approaches to longitudinally measure retention in care provide nuanced assessments that reveal unique insights into different care gaps at different time points over an individuals' treatment. These methods help meet the needs of the current scientific agenda for retention and reveal important opportunities for developing more tailored interventions that target the varied care challenges patients may face over the course of lifelong treatment.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Group-based trajectory analysis; Loss to follow-up; Multi-state analysis; Reengagement; Retention in care; Transfer

Year:  2021        PMID: 33948789     DOI: 10.1007/s11904-021-00561-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep        ISSN: 1548-3568            Impact factor:   5.071


  72 in total

1.  Do increasing rates of loss to follow-up in antiretroviral treatment programs imply deteriorating patient retention?

Authors:  Leigh F Johnson; Janne Estill; Olivia Keiser; Morna Cornell; Haroon Moolla; Michael Schomaker; Anna Grimsrud; Mary-Ann Davies; Andrew Boulle
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Churning in and out of HIV care.

Authors:  Sabin Nsanzimana; Agnes Binagwaho; Steve Kanters; Edward J Mills
Journal:  Lancet HIV       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 12.767

3.  Critical Review: Building on the HIV Cascade: A Complementary "HIV States and Transitions" Framework for Describing HIV Diagnosis, Care, and Treatment at the Population Level.

Authors:  Kimberly A Powers; William C Miller
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.731

4.  Longitudinal HIV Care Trajectories in North Carolina.

Authors:  Kimberly A Powers; Erika Samoff; Mark A Weaver; Lynne A Sampson; William C Miller; Peter A Leone; Heidi Swygard
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 5.  The HIV care cascade: a systematic review of data sources, methodology and comparability.

Authors:  Nicholas A Medland; James H McMahon; Eric P F Chow; Julian H Elliott; Jennifer F Hoy; Christopher K Fairley
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 5.396

6.  Retention and viral suppression in a cohort of HIV patients on antiretroviral therapy in Zambia: Regionally representative estimates using a multistage-sampling-based approach.

Authors:  Izukanji Sikazwe; Ingrid Eshun-Wilson; Kombatende Sikombe; Nancy Czaicki; Paul Somwe; Aaloke Mody; Sandra Simbeza; David V Glidden; Elizabeth Chizema; Lloyd B Mulenga; Nancy Padian; Chris J Duncombe; Carolyn Bolton-Moore; Laura K Beres; Charles B Holmes; Elvin Geng
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 7.  Quantifying and addressing losses along the continuum of care for people living with HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katharina Kranzer; Darshini Govindasamy; Nathan Ford; Victoria Johnston; Stephen D Lawn
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 5.396

8.  Understanding patient transfers across multiple clinics in Zambia among HIV infected adults.

Authors:  Kombatende Sikombe; Aaloke Mody; Jillian Kadota; Jesse Jake Pry; Sandra Simbeza; Ingrid Eshun-Wilson; Sitali Richard Situmbeko; Chama Bukankala; Laura Beres; Njekwa Mukamba; Mwanza Wa Mwanza; Carolyn Bolton-Moore; Charles B Holmes; Elvin H Geng; Izukanji Sikazwe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A side door into care cascade for HIV-infected patients?

Authors:  Timothy B Hallett; Jeffrey W Eaton
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.731

10.  Limitations of the UNAIDS 90-90-90 metrics: a simulation-based comparison of cross-sectional and longitudinal metrics for the HIV care continuum.

Authors:  Noah A Haber; Catherine R Lesko; Matthew P Fox; Kimberly A Powers; Guy Harling; Jessie K Edwards; Joshua A Salomon; Sheri A Lippman; Jacob Bor; Angela Y Chang; Andrew Anglemyer; Audrey Pettifor
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.632

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.