BACKGROUND: Novel interventions for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in adolescents are urgently needed. Ketamine has been studied in adults with TRD, but little information is available for adolescents. This study investigated efficacy and tolerability of intravenous ketamine in adolescents with TRD, and explored clinical response predictors. METHODS: Adolescents, 12-18 years of age, with TRD (failure to respond to two previous antidepressant trials) were administered six ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) infusions over 2 weeks. Clinical response was defined as a 50% decrease in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R); remission was CDRS-R score ≤28. Tolerability assessment included monitoring vital signs and dissociative symptoms using the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS). RESULTS: Thirteen participants (mean age 16.9 years, range 14.5-18.8 years, eight biologically male) completed the protocol. Average decrease in CDRS-R was 42.5% (p = 0.0004). Five (38%) adolescents met criteria for clinical response. Three responders showed sustained remission at 6-week follow-up; relapse occurred within 2 weeks for the other two responders. Ketamine infusions were generally well tolerated; dissociative symptoms and hemodynamic symptoms were transient. Higher dose was a significant predictor of treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the potential role for ketamine in treating adolescents with TRD. Limitations include the open-label design and small sample; future research addressing these issues are needed to confirm these results. Additionally, evidence suggested a dose-response relationship; future studies are needed to optimize dose. Finally, questions remain regarding the long-term safety of ketamine as a depression treatment; more information is needed before broader clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Novel interventions for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in adolescents are urgently needed. Ketamine has been studied in adults with TRD, but little information is available for adolescents. This study investigated efficacy and tolerability of intravenous ketamine in adolescents with TRD, and explored clinical response predictors. METHODS: Adolescents, 12-18 years of age, with TRD (failure to respond to two previous antidepressant trials) were administered six ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) infusions over 2 weeks. Clinical response was defined as a 50% decrease in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R); remission was CDRS-R score ≤28. Tolerability assessment included monitoring vital signs and dissociative symptoms using the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS). RESULTS: Thirteen participants (mean age 16.9 years, range 14.5-18.8 years, eight biologically male) completed the protocol. Average decrease in CDRS-R was 42.5% (p = 0.0004). Five (38%) adolescents met criteria for clinical response. Three responders showed sustained remission at 6-week follow-up; relapse occurred within 2 weeks for the other two responders. Ketamine infusions were generally well tolerated; dissociative symptoms and hemodynamic symptoms were transient. Higher dose was a significant predictor of treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the potential role for ketamine in treating adolescents with TRD. Limitations include the open-label design and small sample; future research addressing these issues are needed to confirm these results. Additionally, evidence suggested a dose-response relationship; future studies are needed to optimize dose. Finally, questions remain regarding the long-term safety of ketamine as a depression treatment; more information is needed before broader clinical use.
Authors: J N Giedd; J Blumenthal; N O Jeffries; F X Castellanos; H Liu; A Zijdenbos; T Paus; A C Evans; J L Rapoport Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Cristina Cusin; Dawn Flosnik Ionescu; Kara Jean Pavone; Oluwaseun Akeju; Paolo Cassano; Norman Taylor; Matthias Eikermann; Kelley Durham; Michaela Ballentyne Swee; Trina Chang; Christina Dording; David Soskin; John Kelley; David Mischoulon; Emery Neal Brown; Maurizio Fava Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 5.744
Authors: Christine A Conelea; Noah S Philip; Agustin G Yip; Jennifer L Barnes; Matthew J Niedzwiecki; Benjamin D Greenberg; Audrey R Tyrka; Linda L Carpenter Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Carlos Zarate; Ronald S Duman; Guosong Liu; Simone Sartori; Jorge Quiroz; Harald Murck Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Marije aan het Rot; Katherine A Collins; James W Murrough; Andrew M Perez; David L Reich; Dennis S Charney; Sanjay J Mathew Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Nirupama Kannikeswaran; Mary Lieh-Lai; Monica Malian; Bo Wang; Ahmad Farooqi; Mark G Roback Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2016-04-02 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Israel Garcia-Carachure; Francisco J Flores-Ramirez; Samuel A Castillo; Anapaula Themann; Miguel A Arenivar; Joshua Preciado-Piña; Arturo R Zavala; Mary Kay Lobo; Sergio D Iñiguez Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Jennifer B Dwyer; Argyris Stringaris; David A Brent; Michael H Bloch Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Jeffrey R Strawn; Scott T Aaronson; Ahmed Z Elmaadawi; G Randolph Schrodt; Richard C Holbert; Sarah Verdoliva; Karen Heart; Mark A Demitrack; Paul E Croarkin Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Alessia Mastrodonato; Ina Pavlova; Noelle C Kee; Van Anh Pham; Josephine C McGowan; J John Mann; Christine A Denny Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Eric M Parise; Lyonna F Parise; Omar K Sial; Astrid M Cardona-Acosta; Trevonn M Gyles; Barbara Juarez; Dipesh Chaudhury; Ming-Hu Han; Eric J Nestler; Carlos A Bolaños-Guzmán Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2021-05-08 Impact factor: 12.810