Literature DB >> 30004250

Incorporating Coexisting Chronic Illness into Decisions about Patient Selection for Lung Cancer Screening. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.

M Patricia Rivera, Nichole T Tanner, Gerard A Silvestri, Frank C Detterbeck, Martin C Tammemägi, Robert P Young, Christopher G Slatore, Tanner J Caverly, Cynthia M Boyd, Dejana Braithwaite, Joelle T Fathi, Michael K Gould, Jonathan M Iaccarino, Stephen P Malkoski, Peter J Mazzone, Lynn T Tanoue, Nancy L Schoenborn, Javier J Zulueta, Renda Soylemez Wiener.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening (LCS) has the potential to reduce the risk of lung cancer death in healthy individuals, but the impact of coexisting chronic illnesses on LCS outcomes has not been well defined. Consideration of the complex relationship between baseline risk of lung cancer, treatment-related harms, and risk of death from competing causes is crucial in determining the balance of benefits and harms of LCS.
OBJECTIVES: To summarize evidence, identify knowledge and research gaps, prioritize topics, and propose methods for future research on how best to incorporate comorbidities in making decisions regarding LCS.
METHODS: A multidisciplinary group of international clinicians and researchers reviewed available data on the effects of comorbidities on LCS outcomes, focusing on the juxtaposition of lung cancer risk and competing risks of death, consideration of benefits and risks in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, communication of risk, and treatment of screen-detected lung cancer.
RESULTS: This statement identifies gaps in knowledge regarding how comorbidities and competing causes of death impact outcomes in LCS, and we have developed questions to help guide future research efforts to better inform patient selection, education, and implementation of LCS.
CONCLUSIONS: There is an urgent need for further research that can help guide clinical decision-making with patients who may not benefit from LCS owing to coexisting chronic illness. This statement establishes a research framework to address essential questions regarding how to incorporate and communicate risks of comorbidities into patient selection and decisions regarding LCS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication of risk; comorbidities; lung cancer screening

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30004250     DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201805-0986ST

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  21 in total

1.  Tools to Promote Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose CT Scanning: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mayuko Ito Fukunaga; Kyle Halligan; Jennifer Kodela; Shaun Toomey; Vanessa Fiorini Furtado; Roger Luckmann; Paul K J Han; Kathleen M Mazor; Sonal Singh
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Overdiagnosis in lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Matthew E J Callister; Peter Sasieni; Hilary A Robbins
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 30.700

3.  Optimizing selection of candidates for lung cancer screening: role of comorbidity, frailty and life expectancy.

Authors:  Shailesh Advani; Dejana Braithwaite
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12

4.  Life-Gained-Based Versus Risk-Based Selection of Smokers for Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Li C Cheung; Christine D Berg; Philip E Castle; Hormuzd A Katki; Anil K Chaturvedi
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Prevalence And Impact of Medical Comorbidities in A Real-World Lung Cancer Screening Population.

Authors:  Harris Majeed; Hong Zhu; Sarah A Williams; Heidi A Hamann; Vijaya Subbu Natchimuthu; Jessica Lee; Noel O Santini; Travis Browning; Tanushree Prasad; Joyce O Adesina; Minh Do; David Balis; Juana Gamarra de Willams; Ellen Kitchell; David H Johnson; Simon J Craddock Lee; David E Gerber
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.840

6.  Lung Cancer Screening With Low Dose Computed Tomography in Patients With and Without Prior History of Cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Danielle D Durham; Martin C Tammemägi; Thad Benefield; Mary W Marsh; M Patricia Rivera
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 20.121

7.  Comorbidity Profiles and Lung Cancer Screening among Older Adults: U.S. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2017-2019.

Authors:  Shailesh Advani; Dongyu Zhang; Martin Tammemagi; Tomi Akinyemiju; Michael K Gould; Gerard A Silvestri; Dejana Braithwaite
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2021-11

8.  Self-reported exercise capacity among current smokers eligible for lung cancer screening: Distribution and association with key comorbidities.

Authors:  Anne C Melzer; Abbie Begnaud; Bruce R Lindgren; Kelsey Schertz; Steven S Fu; David M Vock; Alexander J Rothman; Anne M Joseph
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res Commun       Date:  2021-07-31

9.  Executive Summary: Screening for Lung Cancer: Chest Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Gerard A Silvestri; Lesley H Souter; Tanner J Caverly; Jeffrey P Kanne; Hormuzd A Katki; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Screening for Lung Cancer: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Gerard A Silvestri; Lesley H Souter; Tanner J Caverly; Jeffrey P Kanne; Hormuzd A Katki; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.