Literature DB >> 30002585

Hydronephrosis due to a Migrated Intrauterine Device into the Ureter: A Very Rare Case.

Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt1, Ismail Basmaci1, Tarik Yonguc1, Ozgu Aydogdu1, Mehmet Erhan Aydin1, Ertugrul Sefik1, Tansu Degirmenci1.   

Abstract

Intrauterine device (IUD) insertion is a long-acting and one of the most effective modes of reversible contraception. Complications that most commonly arise following IUD insertion are failed insertion, pain, vasovagal reactions, infection, menstrual abnormalities, and expulsion. In this paper, we present the case of a woman who experienced hydronephrosis due to the migration of IUD into the ureter after 30 years of insertion. To the best of our knowledge, this is the third such case reported in the literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intrauterine device; hydronephrosis; ureter migration

Year:  2018        PMID： 30002585      PMCID： PMC6039143          DOI： 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2017.17157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eurasian J Med        ISSN： 1308-8734


  10 in total

1.  Asymptomatic far-migration of an intrauterine device into the abdominal cavity: A rare entity.

Authors:  Ozgu Aydogdu; Huseyin Pulat
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Transmural migration and perforation of a levonorgestrel intrauterine system: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Carrie Anne Ferguson; Dustin Costescu; Mary Anne Jamieson; Lisa Jong
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Colon penetration by a copper intrauterine device: a case report with literature review.

Authors:  Anil Arslan; Mine Kanat-Pektas; Huseyin Yesilyurt; Umit Bilge
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Brooke Winner; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Christina Buckel; Tessa Madden; Jenifer E Allsworth; Gina M Secura
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Intrauterine contraceptive device appendicitis: a case report.

Authors:  Hao-Ming Chang; Teng-Wei Chen; Chung-Bao Hsieh; Chung-Jueng Chen; Jyh-Cherng Yu; Yao-Chi Liu; Kuo-Liang Shen; De-Chuan Chan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I. Classification, complications, mechanism, incidence, and missing string.

Authors:  D Zakin; W Z Stern; R Rosenblatt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.347

7.  Intrauterine contraception: incidence and factors associated with uterine perforation--a population-based study.

Authors:  Janina Kaislasuo; Satu Suhonen; Mika Gissler; Pekka Lähteenmäki; Oskari Heikinheimo
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices.

Authors:  Klaas Heinemann; Suzanne Reed; Sabine Moehner; Thai Do Minh
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Insertion of intrauterine devices: a comparison of experience with Mirena and Multiload Cu 375 during post-marketing monitoring in New Zealand.

Authors:  Mira Harrison-Woolrych; Lifeng Zhou; David Coulter
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2003-08-08

10.  Perforations with intrauterine devices. Report from a Swedish survey.

Authors:  K Andersson; E Ryde-Blomqvist; K Lindell; V Odlind; I Milsom
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.375
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.