| Literature DB >> 29998787 |
Kristen A Sullivan1, Maggie Little2, Nora E Rosenberg1, Tiwonge Mtande3, Chifundo Zimba3, Elana Jaffe1, Jean Anderson4, Jenell S Coleman4, Sappho Gilbert4, Marielle S Gross Wolf4, Irving Hoffman1, Lisa Rahangdale1, Ruth Faden4, Anne Drapkin Lyerly1.
Abstract
Clinical research to inform the evidence base to guide nonobstetrical care during pregnancy is critically important for the well-being of women and their future offspring. Conversations about regulations for such research, including whether paternal consent should ever be required, should be informed by the perspectives of those most affected, namely, pregnant women. We conducted in-depth interviews with 140 pregnant women living with or at risk of HIV-70 in Malawi, 70 in the United States-exploring their views on requiring paternal consent for pregnant women's participation in trials offering the prospect of direct benefit solely to the fetus. The majority of women supported such a requirement; others raised concerns. A trio of themes-the father's or pregnant woman's rights, fetal protection, and gender/relationship dynamics-characterized views both supporting and against a paternal consent requirement, expanding the range of considerations that should inform approaches to paternal involvement in research with pregnant women.Entities:
Keywords: Malawi; United States; clinical trials; paternal consent; pregnancy; qualitative methods; research ethics; women’s views
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29998787 PMCID: PMC6360530 DOI: 10.1177/1556264618783834
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics ISSN: 1556-2646 Impact factor: 1.742