Literature DB >> 29998601

An improved DNA method to unambiguously detect small hive beetle Aethina tumida, an invasive pest of honeybee colonies.

Paolo Silacci1, Claudine Biolley1, Corinne Jud1, Jean-Daniel Charrière1, Benjamin Dainat1.   

Abstract

The scavenger and invasive species Aethina tumida threatening the honey bee has been recently introduced in Europe. We present a new, reliable and rapid multiplex real-time PCR for efficient diagnostics enabling surveillance programs.
© 2018 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. © 2018 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aethina tumida; Apis mellifera; diagnostics; multiplex PCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29998601      PMCID: PMC6282992          DOI: 10.1002/ps.5141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pest Manag Sci        ISSN: 1526-498X            Impact factor:   4.845


Small hive beetle larvae on brood comb. The small hive beetle (SHB) Aethina tumida Murray (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) is a scavenger native to sub‐Saharan Africa and is a pest of honey bees without provoking significant damage within its endemic range.1, 2 Since the first report in 1996 out of its native range3 in North Carolina, USA, the beetle became an invasive species in Australia, and in central and North America. It was introduced in Europe in 2004 in Portugal where an eradication program was effective and then in Italy in 2014 where infestation is still ongoing4 probably originating from an African population.5 Its life cycle is intimately linked to the honey bee where it mates and reproduces inside the colony and where the larvae feed on beebread, honey and brood causing destruction.1, 6, 7 Besides honey bees, it can also affect bumble bees and stingless bees (see review in reference2). The economic damage to the beekeeping industry can therefore be substantial thereby explaining why the SHB is a statutory notifiable pest in the European Union (EU). After its introduction in Italy, the EU authorities (Commission Implementing Decision 2014/909/EU of 12 December 2014) established new protective measures to prevent SHB spread including the goal to eradicate it if possible. It is consequently of the utmost importance to have an easy, reliable and cheap technique for diagnostics. However, the eggs and larvae stage are extremely difficult to identify with conventional taxonomic techniques bearing a too high risk of incorrect results. A previous PCR assay is based on work published in 2007,8 where an amplification system targeting the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene was proposed. However, the sequence of the reverse primer contains an important internal mismatch of three nucleotides with all currently published A. tumida COI sequences, rendering its application tedious and susceptible to false negative diagnostic. In this study, we propose a new SHB diagnostics using a multiplex PCR approach targeting COI gene and a common region of 18S ribosomal gene as internal control. These results further confirm the validity of the proposed multiplex PCR system for rapid, reliable and specific diagnostics of the small hive beetle (SHB) that may be found in the hive and thus facilitate for example early detection programs. The DNA extraction method was chosen according to a previous study comparing different extraction procedures of genomic DNA from ticks providing material allowing maximal recovery and good quality for a consistent amplification.9 Briefly, insects stored in ethanol 70% (v/v) were air‐dried prior to dissection into four quarters and then DNA was extracted using GeneJet Genomic Kit (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions and eluted into a final volume of 100 μL. Then, 4 μL (0.8–10 ng) of insect genomic DNA were used for amplification. PCR was performed in a 20 μL reaction volume containing 1x KAPA PROBE Fast Universal Master Mix (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA), 200 nmoL/L of COI and 18S primers, 400 nmoL/L of COI probe and 50 nmoL/L of 18S probe. The amplification profile included an activation step of 5 min at 95 °C followed by 60 cycles of a two‐step amplification (5 s at 95 °C; 20 s at 62 °C), using an Eco™ real time PCR device (PCRmax). Primers (Table 1) were designed with Primer‐Blast10 thereby checking specificity in nucleotide Databank to any known sequences and probes with Primer3 v. 0.4.0.11 Both primers and probes were synthetized by Microsynth (Microsynth, Balgach, Switzerland). Amplification results were analyzed with Eco Study v.5.0 (PCRmax). Size and sequence of the COI amplicon were further verified on a DNA extracted from a beetle individual isolated in Italy (data not shown).
Table 1

Sequences of primers and probes targeting COI and 18S genes. Amplicon lengths were of 396 bp for COI and 80 bp for 18S

COI gene18S gene
Forward primers5′‐CGACCCTCAGGCATAACCTT‐3′5′‐AATCAGCGTGTCTTCCCTGG‐3′
Reverse primers5′‐AGGCTCGAGTATCAACGTCTA‐3′5′‐CAATTGCAAGCCCCAATCCC‐3′
Probes5′‐HEX‐GGAAGCCTTTGGAACTTTAGG‐BHQ‐35′‐FAM‐GTAACCCGCTGAACCTCCTT‐BHQ‐3′
Sequences of primers and probes targeting COI and 18S genes. Amplicon lengths were of 396 bp for COI and 80 bp for 18S After optimization of the concentration of the two probes, to further confirm the specificity of the primers the multiplex assay was tested on a total of 49 DNAs extracted from different insects which can be found in the vicinity of colony hives or are common in European fields. The DNA test set included 12 A. tumida individuals of different geographical origins and relatives from the Nitidulidae family. All the DNA extracted from A. tumida were positive for both the internal control 18S and COI gene amplification. Interestingly, threshold cycles (Cq) for the two systems never diverged for more than 6.4 cycles (Table 2). All the other 37 insect samples analyzed were positive for 18S, with Cq ≤ 42.1, and negative for COI (Table 2).
Table 2

Results of multiplex PCR system application to 49 different insect DNA

IndividualSpecies with GBOLD accession number where relevantOriginDevelopment stageAtum Cq18S Cq
1 Aethina tumida ItalyAdult28.728.6
2 Aethina tumida ItalyLarvae30.926.4
3 Aethina tumida ItalyLarvae32.526.1
4 Aethina tumida Italy (Calabria)Adult2122.8
5 Aethina tumida Italy (Calabria)Adult20.222.1
6 Aethina tumida United Kingdom (breeding from an US strain)Larvae35.228.2
7 Aethina tumida United Kingdom (breeding from an US strain)Adult30.326.2
8 Aethina tumida MexicoAdult18.821.4
9 Aethina tumida South AfricaAdult27.934.1
10 Aethina tumida South AfricaAdult2833.4
11 Aethina tumida South AfricaLarvae2831.5
12 Aethina tumida South AfricaLarvae22.430
13 Harmonia axyridis SwitzerlandAdultND16.1
14 Harmonia axyridis SwitzerlandAdultND23.5
15 Muscidae SwitzerlandAdultND42.1
16 Forficula auricularia SwitzerlandAdultND38.5
17 Leptoglossus occidentalis SwitzerlandAdultND37.1
18 Galleria mellonella SwitzerlandLarvaeND21.4
19 Galleria mellonella SwitzerlandLarvaeND22.8
20 Lepidoptera SwitzerlandLarvaeND32.7
21 Varroa destructor SwitzerlandAdultND31
22 Meligethes viridescens SwitzerlandAdultND35
23 Cychramus luteus (Nitidulidae) ZFMK‐TIS‐2504554GermanyAdultND34.9
24 Cychramus luteus (Nitidulidae) ZFMK‐TIS‐2503863GermanyAdultND33.3
25 Cychramus luteus (Nitidulidae) ZFMK‐TIS‐2506747ItalyAdultND34.7
26 Epuraea aestiva (Nitidulidae) ZFMK‐TIS‐13931GermanyAdultND24.3
27 Epuraea aestiva (Nitidulidae) ZFMK‐TIS‐2504534GermanyAdultND29.4
28 Epuraea aestiva (Nitidulidae) ZFMK‐TIS‐2504535GermanyAdultND28.4
29 Glischrochilus hortensis (Nitidulidae) ZFMK‐TIS‐2522755GermanyAdultND30.6
30 Glischrochilus hortensis (Nitidulidae) ZFMK‐TIS‐11274GermanyAdultND37.5
31 Glischrochilus hortensis (Nitidulidae) ZFMK‐TIS‐11650GermanyAdultND29.5
32 Glischrochilus quadriguttatus (Nitidulidae) ZFMK‐TIS‐2515238GermanyAdultND27.9
33 Glischrochilus quadriguttatus (Nitidulidae) ZFMK‐TIS‐2511771GermanyAdultND31.4
34 Glischrochilus quadriguttatus (Nitidulidae) ZFMK‐TIS‐2521080GermanyAdultND25.4
35 Glischrochilus quadriguttatus (Nitidulidae) SwitzerlandAdultND35.2
36 Glischrochilus quadriguttatus (Nitidulidae) SwitzerlandAdultND34.9
37 Glischrochilus quadriguttatus (Nitidulidae) SwitzerlandAdultND30.9
38 Carpophilus sexpustulatus (Nitidulidae) ZFMK‐TIS‐2521034GermanyAdultND29.1
39 Carpophilus sexpustulatus (Nitidulidae) ZFMK‐TIS‐2521033GermanyAdultND26.4
40 Carpophilus sexpustulatus (Nitidulidae) ZFMK‐TIS‐2527002GermanyAdultND29.3
41 Carpophilus sp. (Nitidulidae) ZFMK‐TIS‐2580556SloveniaAdultND27
42 Soronia grisea (Nitidulidae) SwitzerlandAdultND35.7
43 Soronia grisea (Nitidulidae) SwitzerlandAdultND38.2
44 Soronia grisea (Nitidulidae) SwitzerlandAdultND29.9
45 Trichodes alvearius SwitzerlandAdultND28.6
46 Hoplia philanthus (Scarabaeidae) SwitzerlandAdultND17.7
47 Hoplia philanthus (Scarabaeidae) SwitzerlandAdultND18.4
48 Hoplia philanthus (Scarabaeidae) SwitzerlandAdultND19.3
49 Hoplia philanthus (Scarabaeidae) SwitzerlandAdultND19.9

Note: ND, non detected.

Some DNA from insects (individuals 23–34 and 38–41) were obtained from BOLD Germany, details can be found at https://doi.org/10.5883/DS-AETHINA

Results of multiplex PCR system application to 49 different insect DNA Note: ND, non detected. Some DNA from insects (individuals 23–34 and 38–41) were obtained from BOLD Germany, details can be found at https://doi.org/10.5883/DS-AETHINA These observations prove the reliability of our multiplex PCR system, despite single nucleotide mismatches present in the COI reverse primer and at 5′ extremity of the COI probe with three known sequences of A. tumida (KT380625.1, KT380626.1, AF227647.1). These single nucleotide mismatches apparently did not influence COI amplification, nor its specificity. These results further confirm the validity of the proposed multiplex PCR system for a rapid, reliable and specific diagnostics of SHB that may be found in the hive and thus facilitate for example early detection programs.
  3 in total

1.  Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Jian Ye; George Coulouris; Irena Zaretskaya; Ioana Cutcutache; Steve Rozen; Thomas L Madden
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Primer3--new capabilities and interfaces.

Authors:  Andreas Untergasser; Ioana Cutcutache; Triinu Koressaar; Jian Ye; Brant C Faircloth; Maido Remm; Steven G Rozen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  To beat or not to beat a tick: comparison of DNA extraction methods for ticks (Ixodes scapularis).

Authors:  Alyssa D Ammazzalorso; Christine P Zolnik; Thomas J Daniels; Sergios-Orestis Kolokotronis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Cell lines derived from the small hive beetle, Aethina tumida, express insecticide targets.

Authors:  Jacob Corcoran; Cynthia L Goodman; Stephen Saathoff; Joseph A Ringbauer; Ya Guo; Bryony Bonning; David Stanley
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 2.  Molecular Detection and Differentiation of Arthropod, Fungal, Protozoan, Bacterial and Viral Pathogens of Honeybees.

Authors:  Lucas Lannutti; Fernanda Noemi Gonzales; Maria José Dus Santos; Mónica Florin-Christensen; Leonhard Schnittger
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-02

3.  Honey Environmental DNA Can Be Used to Detect and Monitor Honey Bee Pests: Development of Methods Useful to Identify Aethina tumida and Galleria mellonella Infestations.

Authors:  Anisa Ribani; Valeria Taurisano; Valerio Joe Utzeri; Luca Fontanesi
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-27

4.  Reliability of Morphological and PCR Methods for the Official Diagnosis of Aethina tumida (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae): A European Inter-Laboratory Comparison.

Authors:  Stéphanie Franco; Nicolas Cougoule; Amandine Tison; Aurélie Del Cont; Cristina Gastaldi; Ilc Consortium; Véronique Duquesne
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.769

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.