Robert L Williams1, Cirila Estela Vasquez2, Christina M Getrich3, Miria Kano4, Blake Boursaw5, Crystal Krabbenhoft6, Andrew L Sussman6. 1. Department of Family and Community Medicine; MSC09-5060, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA. rlwilliams@salud.unm.edu. 2. Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. Department of Anthropology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA. 4. Cancer Research and Treatment Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA. 5. College of Nursing, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA. 6. Department of Family and Community Medicine; MSC09-5060, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence suggests that clinician racial/gender decision-making biases in some instances contribute to health disparities. Previous work has produced evidence of such biases in medical students. OBJECTIVE: To identify contextual attributes in medical schools associated on average with low levels of racial/gender clinical decision-making biases. DESIGN: A mixed-method design using comparison case studies of 15 medical schools selected based on results of a previous survey of student decision-making bias: 7 schools whose students collectively had, and 8 schools whose students had not shown evidence of such biases. PARTICIPANTS: Purposively sampled faculty, staff, underrepresented minority medical students, and clinical-level medical students at each school. MAIN MEASURES: Quantitative descriptive data and qualitative interview and focus group data assessing 32 school attributes theorized in the literature to be associated with formation of decision-making and biases. We used a mixed-method analytic design with standard qualitative analysis and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. KEY RESULTS: Across the 15 schools, a total of 104 faculty, administrators and staff and 21 students participated in individual interviews, and 196 students participated in 29 focus groups. While no single attribute or group of attributes distinguished the two clusters of schools, analysis showed some contextual attributes were seen more commonly in schools whose students had not demonstrated biases: longitudinal reflective small group sessions; non-accusatory approach to training in diversity; longitudinal, integrated diversity curriculum; admissions priorities and action steps toward a diverse student body; and school service orientation to the community. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several potentially modifiable elements of the training environment that are more common in schools whose students do not show evidence of racial and gender biases.
BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence suggests that clinician racial/gender decision-making biases in some instances contribute to health disparities. Previous work has produced evidence of such biases in medical students. OBJECTIVE: To identify contextual attributes in medical schools associated on average with low levels of racial/gender clinical decision-making biases. DESIGN: A mixed-method design using comparison case studies of 15 medical schools selected based on results of a previous survey of student decision-making bias: 7 schools whose students collectively had, and 8 schools whose students had not shown evidence of such biases. PARTICIPANTS: Purposively sampled faculty, staff, underrepresented minority medical students, and clinical-level medical students at each school. MAIN MEASURES: Quantitative descriptive data and qualitative interview and focus group data assessing 32 school attributes theorized in the literature to be associated with formation of decision-making and biases. We used a mixed-method analytic design with standard qualitative analysis and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. KEY RESULTS: Across the 15 schools, a total of 104 faculty, administrators and staff and 21 students participated in individual interviews, and 196 students participated in 29 focus groups. While no single attribute or group of attributes distinguished the two clusters of schools, analysis showed some contextual attributes were seen more commonly in schools whose students had not demonstrated biases: longitudinal reflective small group sessions; non-accusatory approach to training in diversity; longitudinal, integrated diversity curriculum; admissions priorities and action steps toward a diverse student body; and school service orientation to the community. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several potentially modifiable elements of the training environment that are more common in schools whose students do not show evidence of racial and gender biases.
Entities:
Keywords:
decision-making; healthcare disparities; medical; students
Authors: Lisa A Cooper; Debra L Roter; Kathryn A Carson; Mary Catherine Beach; Janice A Sabin; Anthony G Greenwald; Thomas S Inui Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Robert L Williams; Crystal Romney; Miria Kano; Randy Wright; Betty Skipper; Christina M Getrich; Andrew L Sussman; Stephen J Zyzanski Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-01-27 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Alexander R Green; Dana R Carney; Daniel J Pallin; Long H Ngo; Kristal L Raymond; Lisa I Iezzoni; Mahzarin R Banaji Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-06-27 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Diana J Burgess; Sara E Burke; Brooke A Cunningham; John F Dovidio; Rachel R Hardeman; Yuefeng Hou; David B Nelson; Sylvia P Perry; Sean M Phelan; Mark W Yeazel; Michelle van Ryn Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Cristina M Gonzalez; Maria L Deno; Emily Kintzer; Paul R Marantz; Monica L Lypson; Melissa D McKee Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: John G Oetzel; Blake Boursaw; Maya Magarati; Elizabeth Dickson; Shannon Sanchez-Youngman; Leo Morales; Sarah Kastelic; Milton Mickey Eder; Nina Wallerstein Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2022-05-02