| Literature DB >> 29998357 |
Jayesh A Dhanani1,2,3, Jeremy Cohen4,5, Suzanne L Parker4, Hak-Kim Chan6, Patricia Tang6, Benjamin J Ahern7, Adeel Khan7, Manoj Bhatt8,9, Steven Goodman8, Sara Diab10, Jivesh Chaudhary10, Jeffrey Lipman4,5,11, Steven C Wallis4, Adrian Barnett12, Michelle Chew13, John F Fraser10, Jason A Roberts4,5,14,15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nebulised antibiotics are frequently used for the prevention or treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Many factors may influence pulmonary drug concentrations with inaccurate dosing schedules potentially leading to therapeutic failure and/or the emergence of antibiotic resistance. We describe a research pathway for studying the pharmacokinetics of a nebulised antibiotic during mechanical ventilation using in vitro methods and ovine models, using tobramycin as the study antibiotic.Entities:
Keywords: Inhaled mass; Microdialysis; Nebulised antibiotics; Particle size distribution; Regional drug distribution; Ventilator-associated pneumonia
Year: 2018 PMID: 29998357 PMCID: PMC6041222 DOI: 10.1186/s40635-018-0180-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp ISSN: 2197-425X
Overview of the research pathway with the study components aimed at characterising the pharmacokinetics of nebulised tobramycin
| Research pathway | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | 1. In vitro particle sizing and inhaled mass study | 2. In vivo lung distribution study | 3. In vitro microdialysis recovery study | 4. In vivo lung microdialysis study |
| Aims | Describing and comparing the aerosol characteristics of two formulations of tobramycin | Comparing lung distribution of i.v. vs nebulised radiolabelled tobramycin 400 mg | Comparing relative recovery of vancomycin and tobramycin with microdialysis | Comparing ISF, ELF and blood concentrations of i.v. vs nebulised tobramycin 400 mg |
| Design | In vitro simulated adult mechanical ventilation using | Mechanically ventilated healthy ovine model | In vitro study using simulated in vivo conditions | Mechanically ventilated healthy ovine model |
| Materials and methods | • Size 9.0 mm I.D. ETT and tracheostomy tube | • Technetium-99m-labelled tobramycin 400 mg | • Vancomycin 5 μg/ml | • Bilateral thoracotomy approach for insertion of microdialysis catheters |
| Analysis | Particle size distribution parameters: | • P/C ratio | • Relative recovery values for each of the flow rates | • ELF concentration and PK |
dv volume diameter under which 10% of the sample resides; dv volume median diameter; dv volume diameter under which 90% of the sample resides; FPF fine particle fraction (particle size 1 to 5 μm); inhaled drug percent percent quantity of drug in the inhaled mass filter at the end of the tracheal tube post-nebulisation; lung dose the product of FPF and inhaled drug mass (mg); ELF epithelial lining fluid derived from urea levels; ISF interstitial space fluid; PK pharmacokinetics
Fig. 1Principle of laser diffraction technique for particle sizing
Fig. 2a Experimental set-up for particle sizing experiments. b Experimental set-up for inhaled mass experiments
Fig. 3Schematic diagram demonstrating the principle of lung microdialysis. The unidirectional perfusate flow provides a concentration gradient for diffusion of analytes across a semi-permeable membrane placed in the lung interstitium. The dialysate is then collected in microvials for analysis. a Principles of lung microdialysis with nebulised antibiotics—showing higher antibiotic concentration in the alveoli. b Principles of lung microdialysis with intravenous antibiotics—showing higher antibiotic concentration in the pulmonary arteriole
Comparative characteristics between tobramycin 40 and 100 mg/ml solutions
| Parameters | Tobramycin 40 mg/ml | Tobramycin 100 mg/ml |
|---|---|---|
| pH 88 | 6.88 | 6.99 |
| Viscosity (centipoise) | 1.58 | 2.12 |
| Duration of nebulisation (min) | ||
| Endotracheal tube | 7.88 ± 1.08 | 18.56 ± 2.36* |
| Tracheostomy tube | 12 ± 1.4 | 14.63 ± 1.14* |
| Dv10 (μm) | 1.0 ± 0.05 | 1.4 ± 0.04 |
| VMD (μm) | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.08 |
| Dv95 (μm) | 5.7 ± 0.2 | 3.6 ± 0.8 |
| FPF (%) | 82.3 ± 6 | 99.44 ± 0.3* |
| Lung dose (mg) | 39.2 ± 1.1 | 132.7 ± 12.6* |
dv volume diameter under which 10% of the sample resides; VMD volume median diameter under which 50% of the particles resides; dv volume diameter under which 95% of the sample resides; FPF fine particle fraction (1–5 μm)
*p < 0.05
Fig. 4Comparative dorsal scintigraphy images of lung deposition of i.v and nebulised radiolabelled tobramycin
Quantitative extra-pulmonary tissue radioactivity concentrations
| Organ | Nebulised tobramycin | Intravenous tobramycin |
|---|---|---|
| Liver (Bq/g/Mbq) | 76.5 | 2541.7 |
| Left kidney (Bq/g/Mbq) | 585.8 | 1048.4 |
| Right kidney (Bq/g/Mbq) | 704.2 | 2126.7 |
| Urine (Bq/g/Mbq) | 1479.1 | 7866.3 |
Bq/g/Mbq becquerel per gram per megabecquerel of administered dose
Fig. 5Comparative lung concentrations of tobramycin between nebulised and intravenous route of administration
Comparative epithelial lining fluid concentrations for nebulised and tobramycin sheep at two time points, 1 and 6 h post-antibiotic administration
| ELF time points | Nebulised tobramycin | Intravenous tobramycin |
|---|---|---|
| 1 h (mg/l) | 1.94 | 0.19 |
| 6 h (mg/l) | 0.07 | 0.38 |
| AUCELF (mg-h/l) | 5.99 | 1.52 |
| AUCplasma (mg-h/l) | 56.88 | 53.60 |
| AUClung/AUCplasma (mg-h/l) | 0.11 | 0.03 |
ELF epithelial lining fluid; AUC area under the concentration-time curve