Enzymatic bioelectrocatalysis often requires an artificial redox mediator to observe significant electron transfer rates. The use of such mediators can add a substantial overpotential and obfuscate the protein's native kinetics, which limits the voltage of a biofuel cell and alters the analytical performance of biosensors. Herein, we describe a material for facilitating direct electrochemical communication with redox proteins based on a novel pyrene-modified linear poly(ethyleneimine). This method was applied for promoting direct bioelectrocatalytic reduction of O2 by laccase and, by immobilizing the catalytic subunit of nitrogenase (MoFe protein), to demonstrate the ATP-independent direct electroenzymatic reduction of N2 to NH3.
Enzymatic bioelectrocatalysis often requires an artificial redox mediator to observe significant electron transfer rates. The use of such mediators can add a substantial overpotential and obfuscate the protein's native kinetics, which limits the voltage of a biofuel cell and alters the analytical performance of biosensors. Herein, we describe a material for facilitating direct electrochemical communication with redox proteins based on a novel pyrene-modified linear poly(ethyleneimine). This method was applied for promoting direct bioelectrocatalytic reduction of O2 by laccase and, by immobilizing the catalytic subunit of nitrogenase (MoFe protein), to demonstrate the ATP-independent direct electroenzymatic reduction of N2 to NH3.
Oxidoreductases makeup a class of proteins that facilitate electron transfer reactions and play a critical role in virtually all metabolic pathways. As a result of their biological importance and use in bioelectrochemical devices, there has been a broad, sustained effort to develop strategies for interfacing redox enzymes to an electrode surface.1–15 The primary challenge associated with ‘wiring’ proteins to an electrochemical interface is the large polypeptide shell that often acts as an insulator between the redox-active cofactor and an electrode surface.According to Marcus theory, the terminal redox species of an electron transport chain needs to be within 14 Å of the electrode to enable electron transfer at a rate that is fast relative to the enzymatic reaction.16,17 An approach commonly employed to minimize this distance involves the use of a unique docking motif to immobilize the protein in a desired orientation; however, such strategies are often accomplished at the cost of exceptionally high enzyme loading due to denaturation of the protein during the immobilization/orientation process.18 This led us to consider the possibility of designing polymer materials with a focus on preserving residual protein activity rather than protein orientation at the electrode interface; thereby, preserving sufficient active protein to enable direct electron transfer (DET) through random orientation alone. The primary benefit to this conceptual approach is that it does not require a specific enzymatic binding motif, and therefore enables a “plug and play” template to study the direct electrochemistry for a broad range of redox proteins.Cross-linked hydrogels are commonly used to immobilize biological catalysts onto a variety of electrode surfaces and can stabilize proteins through electrostatic interactions; however, their tendency to form a large porous network disfavours the spatial positioning of protein near the electrode surface necessary for direct electron transfer (DET). Conversely, pyrene has long been reported to adhere to carbon surfaces through non-covalent pi–pi interactions.19 While many reports have utilized pyrene in an attempt to anchor proteins directly to a carbon electrode,19–22 we hypothesized that pyrene could be employed to bind a hydrogel onto a carbon surface, thereby creating a matrix to entrap and stabilize a redox enzyme at the electrode interface (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Scheme depicting the docking approach as compared to the hydrogel immobilization approach described here. Active redox protein is depicted in green, while inactive/denatured redox protein is depicted as grey.
Herein, we describe a broadly applicable approach for direct electrochemical communication with redox-active proteins based on linear poly(ethylenimine) (LPEI) that has been covalently modified with pyrene moieties. The newly prepared pyrene-modified LPEI (pyrene-LPEI) can be used to immobilize a wide variety of oxidoreductases by cross-linking in the presence multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) at a carbon electrode to enable direct bioelectrocatalysis. We aim to demonstrate the robustness of our approach by employing pyrene-LPEI to facilitate DET in two example redox proteins, laccase and nitrogenase, for the electroenzymatic reduction of O2 at exceptionally low overpotentials, and the bioelectrosynthesis of NH3 from N2, respectively.
Results and discussion
To initiate our investigation, we prepared pyrene-LPEI by reacting an excess of 1-pyrenebutyric acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester with high molecular weight LPEI overnight at room temperature followed by a thorough purification process to remove any unreacted pyrenebutyric acid NHS (a complete description of synthetic procedures and polymer characterizations is provided in the ESI†). The resulting polymer was determined by 1H-NMR to be substituted with pyrene pendant moieties on 22% of the backbone amines, and readily soluble in water up 10 mg mL–1. Similar to pyrene, pyrene-LPEI exhibits two strong fluorescence bands at 475 and 375 nm that correspond to a self-pi-stacked excimer and ‘free’ pyrene, where the ratio of intensity for these peaks skews towards free pyrene at low concentrations (Fig. S8a†).‡
To determine the ability of pyrene-LPEI to pi-stack onto MWCNTs, a Toraycarbon paper electrode coated in MWCNT–COOH was incubated in a fluorescence cuvette for 10 minutes. The resulting solution exhibited significant quenching of the excimer fluorescence band in the presence of both bare Toray paper and MWCNT-coated Toray paper (Fig. S8b and c†). This is consistent with static quenching caused by the formation of pi–pi stacking complexes between pyrene and various carbon surfaces.23‡It should be noted that ‘free’ pyrene in this context is still covalently bound to the LPEI backbone but is not complexed to any other polymer-bound pyrene.With polymer in hand, we sought to determine the feasibility of utilizing a cross-linked pyrene-modified hydrogel to immobilize and stabilize redox proteins at a carbon electrode surface. Several previous reports have demonstrated the ability of laccase from Trametes versicolor to undergo DET in the electroenzymatic reduction of O2.24–26 Laccase contains a single Cu atom near the protein surface (Cu–I) responsible for transferring electrons from an electron donor to a three-Cu cluster in the protein interior that catalyses the reduction of O2 to water at 0.615 ± 0.007 V vs. SCE (Fig. 2), and therefore direct bioelectrocatalysis of laccase depends on a sufficient quantity of the enzyme being oriented so the Cu–I site is within ∼14 Å of the electrode surface.27 Based on the ubiquity of laccase throughout the bioelectrocatalysis literature and its robust and well-understood electron transfer mechanism, we employed it as a benchmark for preliminary investigations focused on optimizing the newly prepared pyrene-LPEI.
Fig. 2
(A) Scheme depicting the electrochemical reduction of O2 to H2O by laccase (blue). Square wave voltammogram for the Cu–I site of laccase immobilized in a cross-linked pyrene-LPEI film (B) and cyclic voltammograms of the same film under a bubbling of nitrogen () or oxygen () (C). A plot depicting the background-subtracted catalytic current density (jmax) () and capacitive current density () for pyrene-LPEI/laccase films in the presence of O2 as a function of carbon nanotube loading (D). CVs were performed using 100 mM citrate buffer at pH 4.5, 25 °C and a scan rate of 5 mV s–1.
(A) Scheme depicting the proposed direct electron transfer pathway for reduction of nitrite by MoFe protein (green). Cyclic voltammogram (B) and square wave voltammogram (C) for pyrene-LPEI films containing active () or denatured () MoFe protein. (D) Cyclic voltammogram of pyrene-LPEI films in containing active MoFe in the absence of nitrite () or films containing active MoFe (), denatured MoFe () and without MoFe () in the presence of 100 mM NaNO2. CVs were performed using 100 mM MOPS buffer at pH 7.0, 25 °C and a scan rate of 5 mV s–1.
For further evidence of direct electron transfer, we aimed to determine the ability of immobilized MoFe protein to exhibit direct bioelectrocatalysis. While N2 is the native substrate for nitrogenase, its gaseous nature makes it difficult to utilize in activity assays and previous Fe protein-decoupled studies have employed NO2– as a water soluble nitrogenase substrate.32 Consequently, our initial electrochemical activity experiments for the MoFe protein were performed using aqueous NaNO2. Cyclic voltammograms of the active MoFe protein immobilized in pyrene-LPEI exhibits a dramatically increased current density in the presence of 100 mM NaNO2 when compared to either the denatured MoFe protein or the pyrene-LPEI film alone (Fig. 3). It should be noted that the control employing denatured MoFe protein exhibits a small increase in current upon addition of NO2–; however, this is consistent with previous observations that the denatured P-cluster maintains residual activity towards nitrite. Nevertheless, these results suggest that the MoFe protein is both active inside the pyrene-LPEI film and is capable of direct bioelectrocatalysis.Next, we aimed to explore the ability of pyrene-LPEI/MoFe protein films to reduce N2via direct bioelectrocatalysis. Due to the high sensitivity of the in vitro MoFe protein to O2, extreme care was taken to ensure that the electrochemical cell remained completely anaerobic. Bioelectrochemical activity of pyrene-LPEI/MoFe protein to N2 was measured by cyclic voltammetry under Ar and increasing time of bubbling in ultra high purity N2 (Fig. 4A). The resulting voltammogram demonstrates an increasing current density with additional bubbling of N2, which suggests that this is the first observation of bioelectrochemical N2 reduction in the absence of ATP. To confirm this result, we performed constant potential bulk electrolysis using electrodes coated with pyrene-LPEI containing active MoFe protein, denatured MoFe protein, BSA, and no protein in a sealed cell after bubbling ultra high purity N2 for 20 minutes. Products of the resulting electrolyses were analysed by a fluorometric assay to confirm and quantify the production of NH3. An aliquot of each electrolysis solution was combined with o-phthalaldehyde, which forms a fluorescent complex with NH3.25,32 Product analysis demonstrated that the bioelectrosynthetic reduction of N2 produced 180 ± 30 nmol of NH3 (1.1 ± 0.2 μmol mg–1 MoFe) compared to 44 ± 9 nmol NH3 under Ar, and 10 ± 9 nmol NH3 produced under N2 using pyrene-LPEI without the MoFe protein (Fig. 4B).
Fig. 4
(A) Cyclic voltammograms of pyrene-LPEI films containing MoFe protein and 5 mg mL–1 MWCNT–COOH under Ar (), and after 5 min (), or 10 min () of bubbling ultra high purity N2. (B) Production of NH3 using N2 as the only substrate after constant potential bulk electrolysis of pyrene-LPEI/MoFe films for 8 h. CVs were performed using 100 mM MOPS buffer at pH 7.0, 25 °C and a scan rate of 5 mV s–1. Bulk electrolysis was performed using 100 mM MOPS buffer pH 7.0 at –1.1 V vs. SCE and 25 °C. Error bars represent one standard deviation, where n = 3.
Given the success of this method for studying direct bioelectrochemistry of laccase and nitrogenase, we sought to investigate the extent of applicability to a small sample of additional redox proteins containing a relatively diverse set of electrochemical potentials and redox cofactors. The resulting pyrene-LPEI/protein combinations were studied by CV and SWV to confirm the electrochemical potential of each observed cofactor. The results are summarized in Table 1 and representative CVs are displayed in Fig. 5.
Table 1
A compilation of redox potentials obtained by square wave voltammetry of cross-linked pyrene-LPEI films containing 80 μg of protein per film. The same protein/hydrogel film preparation procedure was used for all proteins studied, and films were coated onto 0.25 cm2 Toray electrode without the addition of CNTs
Enzyme
Cofactor
pH
Redox potential, E/V vs. SCE
This work
Literature
Ref.
Laccase
Cu-l
4.5
–0.615 ± 0.007
–0.556
25
Cytochrome C
Heme
7.0
–0.200 ± 0.006
–0.174
38
MoFe protein (nitrogenase)
P-Cluster [8Fe–7S]
7.0
–0.512 ± 0.008
–0.544
39
Ferredoxin
[2Fe–2S]
7.0
–0.583 ± 0.003
–0.609
38
Flavodoxin
FMN
7.0
–0.727 ± 0.008
–0.688
40
Free FMN
FMN
7.0
–0.437 ± 0.003
–0.462
40
Fig. 5
Representative cyclic voltammograms of pyrene-LPEI films containing 5 mg mL–1 MWCNT–COOH and laccase under nitrogen (), laccase under O2 (), cytochrome C (), ferredoxin (), flavodoxin (), MoFe protein under argon (), and MoFe protein under N2 (). All pyrene-LPEI/protein films were prepared using a single procedure (ESI†) without optimization for individual redox proteins. CVs were performed using 100 mM citrate (pH 4.5, for laccase), MOPS (pH 7.0 for MoFe protein), or phosphate (pH 7.0) at 25 °C and a scan rate of 5 mV s–1.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we report a robust method based on a novel pyrene-modified LPEI material for creating a direct bioelectrochemical interface between a series of redox proteins and a carbon electrode without the need for specific orientation. Using this method, we were able to demonstrate direct electron transfer to MoFe protein of the nitrogenase complex and subsequent direct bioelectrochemical synthesis of NH3 from N2 without the need for ATP nor an artificial redox mediator. Future work will employ this method to study the direct electrochemical kinetics for the P-cluster and FeMoco of MoFe protein independently to provide a better understanding of the role each cofactor plays in the overall enzymatic mechanism of N2 reduction by nitrogenase.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Karamatullah Danyal; Andrew J Rasmussen; Stephen M Keable; Boyd S Inglet; Sudipta Shaw; Oleg A Zadvornyy; Simon Duval; Dennis R Dean; Simone Raugei; John W Peters; Lance C Seefeldt Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Matthew S Thorum; Cyrus A Anderson; Jeremy J Hatch; Andrew S Campbell; Nicholas M Marshall; Steven C Zimmerman; Yi Lu; Andrew A Gewirth Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Stephen A Merchant; Tu O Tran; Matthew T Meredith; Tracy C Cline; Daniel T Glatzhofer; David W Schmidtke Journal: Langmuir Date: 2009-07-07 Impact factor: 3.882
Authors: Shengtao Lu; Roselyn M Rodrigues; Shuyuan Huang; Daniel A Estabrook; John O Chapman; Xun Guan; Ellen M Sletten; Chong Liu Journal: Chem Catal Date: 2021-06-28
Authors: Yoo Seok Lee; Adrian Ruff; Rong Cai; Koun Lim; Wolfgang Schuhmann; Shelley D Minteer Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 15.336