Literature DB >> 29997260

Functional capacity of kangaroo rat hindlimbs: adaptations for locomotor performance.

Jeffery W Rankin1,2, Kelsey M Doney3, Craig P McGowan4,5.   

Abstract

Many cursorial and large hopping species are extremely efficient locomotors with various morphological adaptations believed to reduce mechanical demand and improve movement efficiency, including elongated distal limb segments. However, despite having elongated limbs, small hoppers such as desert kangaroo rats (Dipodomys deserti) are less efficient locomotors than their larger counterparts, which may be in part due to avoiding predators through explosive jumping movements. Despite potentially conflicting mechanical demands between the two movements, kangaroo rats are both excellent jumpers and attain high hopping speeds, likely due to a specialized hindlimb musculoskeletal morphology. This study combined experimental dissection data with a static analysis of muscle moment generating capacities using a newly developed musculoskeletal model to characterize kangaroo rat hindlimb musculoskeletal architecture and investigate how morphology has evolved to meet hopping and jumping mechanical demands. Hindlimb morphology appears biased towards generating constant moment arms over large joint ranges of motion in this species, which may balance competing requirements by reducing the need for posture and movement specific excitation patterns. The ankle extensors are a major exception to the strong positive relationship exhibited by most muscles between muscle architecture parameters (e.g. Lfibre) and joint moment arms. These muscles appear suited to meeting the high moments required for jumping: the biarticular nature of the ankle extensors is leveraged to reduce MTU strain and create a four-bar linkage that facilitates proximal force transfer. The kangaroo rat hindlimb provides an interesting case study for understanding how morphology balances the sometimes competing demands of hopping and jumping.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  hopping; jumping; mechanical advantage; muscle architecture; muscle–tendon unit; musculoskeletal model

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29997260      PMCID: PMC6073650          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  51 in total

1.  Probing the limits to muscle-powered accelerations: lessons from jumping bullfrogs.

Authors:  Thomas J Roberts; Richard L Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  The role of human ankle plantar flexor muscle-tendon interaction and architecture in maximal vertical jumping examined in vivo.

Authors:  Dominic James Farris; Glen A Lichtwark; Nicholas A T Brown; Andrew G Cresswell
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  The uncertainty of the pendulum method for the determination of the moment of inertia.

Authors:  James J Dowling; Jennifer L Durkin; David M Andrews
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  The role of the biarticular hamstrings and gastrocnemius muscles in closed chain lower limb extension.

Authors:  Daniel J Cleather; Dominic F L Southgate; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Scaling of energetic cost of running to body size in mammals.

Authors:  C R Taylor; K Schmidt-Nielsen; J L Raab
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1970-10

6.  Allometry of muscle, tendon, and elastic energy storage capacity in mammals.

Authors:  C M Pollock; R E Shadwick
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-03

7.  In vivo muscle force and elastic energy storage during steady-speed hopping of tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii)

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Optimizing the Distribution of Leg Muscles for Vertical Jumping.

Authors:  Jeremy D Wong; Maarten F Bobbert; Arthur J van Soest; Paul L Gribble; Dinant A Kistemaker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Muscle moment arms of pelvic limb muscles of the ostrich (Struthio camelus).

Authors:  N C Smith; R C Payne; K J Jespers; A M Wilson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Inferring muscle functional roles of the ostrich pelvic limb during walking and running using computer optimization.

Authors:  Jeffery W Rankin; Jonas Rubenson; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.118

View more
  5 in total

1.  Computational modelling of muscle fibre operating ranges in the hindlimb of a small ground bird (Eudromia elegans), with implications for modelling locomotion in extinct species.

Authors:  Peter J Bishop; Krijn B Michel; Antoine Falisse; Andrew R Cuff; Vivian R Allen; Friedl De Groote; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Eliminating high-intensity activity during growth reduces mechanical power capacity but not submaximal metabolic cost in a bipedal animal model.

Authors:  Suzanne Michelle Cox; Matthew Q Salzano; Stephen J Piazza; Jonas Rubenson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-11-21

3.  Functional capacity of kangaroo rat hindlimbs: adaptations for locomotor performance.

Authors:  Jeffery W Rankin; Kelsey M Doney; Craig P McGowan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Tendons from kangaroo rats are exceptionally strong and tough.

Authors:  Mehrdad Javidi; Craig P McGowan; Nathan R Schiele; David C Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Comparison between the kinematics for kangaroo rat hopping on a solid versus sand surface.

Authors:  Joseph K Hall; Craig P McGowan; David C Lin
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.963

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.