Literature DB >> 29994302

Deep Learning Techniques for Automatic MRI Cardiac Multi-Structures Segmentation and Diagnosis: Is the Problem Solved?

Olivier Bernard, Alain Lalande, Clement Zotti, Frederick Cervenansky, Xin Yang, Pheng-Ann Heng, Irem Cetin, Karim Lekadir, Oscar Camara, Miguel Angel Gonzalez Ballester, Gerard Sanroma, Sandy Napel, Steffen Petersen, Georgios Tziritas, Elias Grinias, Mahendra Khened, Varghese Alex Kollerathu, Ganapathy Krishnamurthi, Marc-Michel Rohe, Xavier Pennec, Maxime Sermesant, Fabian Isensee, Paul Jager, Klaus H Maier-Hein, Peter M Full, Ivo Wolf, Sandy Engelhardt, Christian F Baumgartner, Lisa M Koch, Jelmer M Wolterink, Ivana Isgum, Yeonggul Jang, Yoonmi Hong, Jay Patravali, Shubham Jain, Olivier Humbert, Pierre-Marc Jodoin.   

Abstract

Delineation of the left ventricular cavity, myocardium, and right ventricle from cardiac magnetic resonance images (multi-slice 2-D cine MRI) is a common clinical task to establish diagnosis. The automation of the corresponding tasks has thus been the subject of intense research over the past decades. In this paper, we introduce the "Automatic Cardiac Diagnosis Challenge" dataset (ACDC), the largest publicly available and fully annotated dataset for the purpose of cardiac MRI (CMR) assessment. The dataset contains data from 150 multi-equipments CMRI recordings with reference measurements and classification from two medical experts. The overarching objective of this paper is to measure how far state-of-the-art deep learning methods can go at assessing CMRI, i.e., segmenting the myocardium and the two ventricles as well as classifying pathologies. In the wake of the 2017 MICCAI-ACDC challenge, we report results from deep learning methods provided by nine research groups for the segmentation task and four groups for the classification task. Results show that the best methods faithfully reproduce the expert analysis, leading to a mean value of 0.97 correlation score for the automatic extraction of clinical indices and an accuracy of 0.96 for automatic diagnosis. These results clearly open the door to highly accurate and fully automatic analysis of cardiac CMRI. We also identify scenarios for which deep learning methods are still failing. Both the dataset and detailed results are publicly available online, while the platform will remain open for new submissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29994302     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2837502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  104 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in diffusion MRI tractography - Lessons learned from international benchmark competitions.

Authors:  Kurt G Schilling; Alessandro Daducci; Klaus Maier-Hein; Cyril Poupon; Jean-Christophe Houde; Vishwesh Nath; Adam W Anderson; Bennett A Landman; Maxime Descoteaux
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Parametric-based feature selection via spherical harmonic coefficients for the left ventricle myocardial infarction screening.

Authors:  Gelareh Valizadeh; Farshid Babapour Mofrad; Ahmad Shalbaf
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  A Convolutional Neural Network-based Deformable Image Registration Method for Cardiac Motion Estimation from Cine Cardiac MR Images.

Authors:  Roshan Reddy Upendra; Brian Jamison Wentz; Suzanne M Shontz; Cristian A Linte
Journal:  Comput Cardiol (2010)       Date:  2021-02-10

4.  Multi-modal latent space inducing ensemble SVM classifier for early dementia diagnosis with neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Tao Zhou; Kim-Han Thung; Mingxia Liu; Feng Shi; Changqing Zhang; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Artificial intelligence and automation in valvular heart diseases.

Authors:  Qiang Long; Xiaofeng Ye; Qiang Zhao
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence in pediatric and adult congenital cardiac MRI: an unmet clinical need.

Authors:  Arghavan Arafati; Peng Hu; J Paul Finn; Carsten Rickers; Andrew L Cheng; Hamid Jafarkhani; Arash Kheradvar
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-10

Review 7.  Reference ranges ("normal values") for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update.

Authors:  Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Scott J Hetzel; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Gabriella Captur; Christopher J Francois; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Michael Salerno; Shawn D Teague; Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Rob J van der Geest; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 8.  Artificial intelligence in personalized cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Ikram-Ul Haq; Iqraa Haq; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

9.  A deep learning-based approach for automatic segmentation and quantification of the left ventricle from cardiac cine MR images.

Authors:  Hisham Abdeltawab; Fahmi Khalifa; Fatma Taher; Norah Saleh Alghamdi; Mohammed Ghazal; Garth Beache; Tamer Mohamed; Robert Keynton; Ayman El-Baz
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 4.790

10.  Explainable Anatomical Shape Analysis Through Deep Hierarchical Generative Models.

Authors:  Carlo Biffi; Juan J Cerrolaza; Giacomo Tarroni; Wenjia Bai; Antonio de Marvao; Ozan Oktay; Christian Ledig; Loic Le Folgoc; Konstantinos Kamnitsas; Georgia Doumou; Jinming Duan; Sanjay K Prasad; Stuart A Cook; Declan P O'Regan; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.