| Literature DB >> 29993024 |
Mohammad Jaber Alipour1, Jonna Jalanka2, Tiina Pessa-Morikawa1, Tuomo Kokkonen3, Reetta Satokari2, Ulla Hynönen1, Antti Iivanainen1, Mikael Niku4.
Abstract
Recent research suggests that the microbial colonization of the mammalian intestine may begin before birth, but the observations are controversial due to challenges in the reliable sampling and analysis of low-abundance microbiota. We studied the perinatal microbiota of calves by sampling them immediately at birth and during the first postnatal week. The large size of the bovine newborns allows sampling directly from rectum using contamination-shielded swabs. Our 16S rDNA data, purged of potential contaminant sequences shared with negative controls, indicates the existence of a diverse low-abundance microbiota in the newborn rectal meconium and mucosa. The newborn rectal microbiota was composed of Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes. The microbial profile resembled dam oral rather than fecal or vaginal vestibular microbiota, but included typical intestinal taxa. During the first postnatal day, the rectum was invaded by Escherichia/Shigella and Clostridia, and the diversity collapsed. By 7 days, diversity was again increasing. In terms of relative abundance, Proteobacteria were replaced by Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria, including Faecalibacterium, Bacteroides, Lactobacillus, Butyricicoccus and Bifidobacterium. Our observations suggest that mammals are seeded before birth with a diverse microbiota, but the microbiota changes rapidly in the early postnatal life.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29993024 PMCID: PMC6041309 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-28733-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 116S rDNA copy numbers per sample. Blue = negative controls, green = calf rectal sampling swabs. Values represent 16S rDNA copy numbers per sampling swab or the corresponding amount of extraction reagent (extraction control) or ultra pure H2O (no-template control). 24 h and 7 d samples were diluted more before amplification, in order to fit in the qPCR dynamic range (dashed line). The boxes represent the interquartile ranges (IQR) containing the middle 50% of cases. The horizontal line in a box indicates the median. Whiskers show maxima and minima within 1.5× IQR. Circles indicate outliers between 1.5–3× IQR.
Figure 2Effect of data decontamination on the animal microbiota samples. Each bar represents all sequence reads obtained from one sample. Green color shows the proportion of genotypes (de-noised 16S rDNA sequences) found only in the actual samples. Yellow shows genotypes which were shared between samples and negative controls, but were accepted due to more than four-fold relative abundance in samples. Red shows sequences which were removed due to their abundance in the controls.
Characteristics of the 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing data.
| Newborn rectum | 24 h rectum | 7 d rectum | Dam feces | Dam mouth | Dam vaginal vestibule | Empty swab ctrl | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 21 | 21 | 21 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 3 |
| Reads, raw | 21342 (11198) | 76993 (39128) | 47755 (16912) | 25579 (3453) | 51539 (15477) | 39464 (13936) | 4486 (3449) |
| Reads, decont. | 7127 (10659) | 76854 (39164) | 36008 (9917) | 24617 (3633) | 48907 (15670) | 38894 (14024) | 44 (30) |
| OTU, raw | 142 (66) | 68 (78) | 72 (30) | 335 (17) | 339 (118) | 362 (35) | 78 (17) |
| OTU, decont. | 100 (66) | 40 (63) | 54 (12) | 322 (12) | 275 (120) | 336 (32) | 4 (4) |
| Genera, raw | 94 (6) | 37 (16) | 39 (26) | 74 (12) | 136 (31) | 95 (19) | 58 (9) |
| Genera, decont. | 64 (5) | 22 (17) | 26 (22) | 58.5 (5) | 112 (28) | 70.5 (12) | 4 (3.5) |
| Actinobacteria % | 11 (16) | 0 (0.18) | 2.8 (6.2) | 0.40 (0.16) | 3.1 (3.0) | 1.0 (3.2) | |
| Bacteroidetes % | 5.2 (13) | 0 (0.49) | 12 (17) | 20 (5.2) | 2.4 (4.4) | 7.7 (8.8) | |
| Firmicutes % | 39 (22) | 22 (20) | 80 (28) | 76 (5.1) | 62 (9.7) | 83 (10) | |
| Proteobacteria % | 30 (18) | 78 (20) | 0.38 (15) | 0.42 (0.41) | 33 (12) | 0.70 (1.9) |
Medians and standard deviations (in parentheses) for sequence reads, OTU and genus level taxa numbers in raw and decontaminated data, and relative abundances of major phyla in decontaminated data are shown.
Figure 3Microbiota composition and microbial diversity in calves (n = 21) and adults (n = 10). (a) Median microbiota compositions (scaled to totals of 100%) and sequence numbers. Within phyla, the relative abundances of individual genera are shown with different shades. The lightest shades in each phylum show the combined abundance of the least abundant genera (<0.5% of total). For sequencing, control and newborn samples were preamplified by 21 PCR cycles, 7-day and adult feces by 15, and others by 18 to compensate for different quantities of 16S rDNA copies in the samples. (b) Shannon diversity. Boxplot as in Fig. 1.
Core bacterial taxa (>0.1% relative abundance, >75% prevalence) in newborn rectal swabs.
| Taxon | Abundance | SD | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firmicutes | |||
|
| 2.5% | 9.3% | 100% |
|
| 0.7% | 3.3% | 95% |
|
| 2.7% | 7.1% | 95% |
|
| 0.1% | 0.3% | 76% |
|
| 0.6% | 1.9% | 76% |
|
| 0.7% | 2.6% | 76% |
| 1.1% | 1.8% | 95% | |
| 2.2% | 2.6% | 95% | |
| 0.6% | 0.8% | 76% | |
| Proteobacteria | |||
|
| 0.2% | 0.5% | 86% |
|
| 0.6% | 0.6% | 86% |
|
| 0.6% | 0.5% | 100% |
|
| 0.2% | 0.5% | 76% |
|
| 0.7% | 11.7% | 90% |
| 0.6% | 1.3% | 90% | |
| 0.9% | 4.5% | 95% | |
| 0.1% | 3.1% | 81% | |
|
| 6.6% | 5.2% | 100% |
|
| 2.7% | 6.1% | 95% |
| Actinobacteria | |||
|
| 2.8% | 14.9% | 100% |
|
| 0.5% | 0.7% | 95% |
|
| 1.0% | 2.5% | 95% |
|
| 0.7% | 3.3% | 86% |
|
| 0.1% | 0.5% | 86% |
| Bacteroidetes | |||
|
| 0.6% | 2.0% | 90% |
| Unclassified Bacteroidetes | 0.4% | 1.4% | 76% |
Median relative abundances, standard deviations and prevalence in 21 calves are shown.
Figure 4(a) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of newborn rectal microbiota and dam fecal, oral and vaginal vestibular microbiota. The sample type explained 53% of the variance across all samples. n = 21 calves and 10 cows. (b) Similarity of microbiota in newborns and their own dams, expressed as Spearman correlations (ρ). Boxplot as in Fig. 3; n = 10 calf-dam pairs. (c) Similarity of microbiota in newborns and the same calves at 24 h and 7 d (ρ). n = 21 calves.
Figure 5Shared genus-level bacterial taxa. (a) Taxa shared between newborns and various dam samples (total: 136 taxa). (b) Taxa shared between newborns and older calves (total: 73 taxa). For each sample group, all taxa with a median abundance >0 were included. Note that a larger number of taxa were shared at lower abundance levels (see text).
Figure 6Co-existence of genus-level bacterial taxa in newborns and their own dams. The heatmap shows the occurrence of each taxon in the feces, vaginal vestibule and mouth of the cow, if detected in the cow’s own calf (cutoff: ≥20 hits/taxon/animal), and the occurrence of each taxon in the calves. Only the taxa present in >50% of the newborns are shown.
Core bacterial taxa (>0.1% relative abundance, >75% prevalence) in 24 h calf rectum.
| Taxon | Abundance | SD | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proteobacteria | |||
|
| 76.8% | 24.87% | 100% |
| 0.4% | 8.21% | 90% | |
| Firmicutes | |||
|
| 0.8% | 7.51% | 100% |
|
| 0.2% | 4.11% | 95% |
|
| 8.2% | 14.38% | 100% |
Median relative abundances, standard deviations and prevalence in 21 calves are shown.
Core bacterial taxa (>0.1% relative abundance, >75% prevalence) in 7 d calf rectum.
| Taxon | Abundance | SD | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firmicutes | |||
|
| 8.3% | 8.21% | 100% |
|
| 0.1% | 24.87% | 95% |
|
| 2.0% | 8.21% | 90% |
|
| 3.8% | 24.87% | 100% |
|
| 27.5% | 24.87% | 100% |
| 1.5% | 24.87% | 90% | |
| 1.0% | 8.21% | 95% | |
| Bacteroidetes | |||
|
| 11.6% | 17.37% | 100% |
|
| 0.1% | 0.51% | 81% |
| Actinobacteria | |||
|
| 2.6% | 6.13% | 95% |
Median relative abundances, standard deviations and prevalence in 21 calves are shown.
Figure 7Rectal sampling swab. The sterile equine uterine sampling swab is protected by a double sheath, which prevents contamination at the anus. The sampling head was only exposed within the rectum and then in the laminar flow cabinet upon DNA extraction.