Literature DB >> 29991675

Practical Suggestions for Prevention of Complications Arising from Oxidized Cellulose Retention: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi1, Elisa Reitano1, Valerio Panizzo2, Barbara Rubino3, Davide Bona2, Domenico Tringali2, Giancarlo Micheletto2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND Bleeding is a major intraoperative complication during surgical procedures. When conventional methods such as ligature and diathermocoagulation are ineffective for bleeding management, hemostatic agents should be used. Oxidized cellulose is one of the major hemostatic agents used worldwide. Oxidized cellulose is often left in situ after hemostasis because of its high level of reabsorption that lasts up to 8 weeks. However, 38 cases of retaining-associated complications are reported in the literature. CASE REPORT A 51-year-old male patient presented in our emergency department with acute abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. The patient had been admitted in our department for laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis 25 months previously. Abdominal ultrasound and CT scan showed the presence of a cystic circular mass, with homogeneous fluid content, close to the surgical clips of the previous surgery, resembling a "neogallbladder". Laparoscopic abdominal exploration and drainage were performed. Histological examination reported protein-based amorphous material with rare lymphocytes and macrophages. Culturing was negative for bacterial growth. The patient was discharged uneventfully on the 4 th postoperative day. The primary surgical report was evaluated with evidence of application of Gelita-Cel ® Standard for hemostatic purposes. Results of 12-month follow-up were normal. CONCLUSIONS Herein, we report the first case of a complication associated with the use of Gelita-Cel ® Standard. We reviewed the literature to better define the purpose and limits of oxidized cellulose use as a hemostatic agent. Despite the fundamental role of oxidized cellulose as a hemostatic agent, we provide some practical suggestions to prevent the reported severe complications and surgical overtreatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29991675      PMCID: PMC6066980          DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.910060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Case Rep        ISSN: 1941-5923


Background

Successful hemostasis has always been fundamental in all surgical procedures. Ligature and diathermocoagulation are the main hemostatic methods; however, since 1909, with the use of fibrin [1], numerous hemostatic agents (HA) have become available. In 1945, oxidized cellulose (OC) was introduced in surgery and it has become one of the major HAs because of its ease of use, favorable biocompatibility, and bactericidal properties [2-4]. Several OCs are available and classified in regenerated oxidized cellulose (ROC; e.g. Surgicel® – Johnson and Johnson, Somerville, NJ, USA) and non-regenerated oxidized cellulose (nROC; e.g., Oxycell® – Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Although the manufacturers recommend the OC removal after its use, it is generally left in situ because of its high level of reabsorption that lasts up to 8 weeks. However, several cases of retained OC with severe complications have been reported in the literature. Here, we describe a complication that was associated with the use of Gelita-Cel® Standard (ROC; Gelita Medical, Eberbach, Germany) and we review the literature to better define the purpose and limits of OC as a hemostatic agent.

Case Report

A 51-year-old male patient presented in our emergency department with acute abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Laboratory test results were normal with no evidence of inflammation markers (white blood cells: 8.03×103/µl; neutrophils: 68.2%; C reactive protein: 3 mg/l). He had been admitted to our department for laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis 25 months previously. The patient complained of moderate abdominal pain since his first operation; therefore, he had abdominal CT scan at 6 months, showing evidence of a circular mass (39×34 mm) with fluid content (density 35–45 HU). In addition, an abdominal US at 24 months showed a non-vascularized mass in the liver bed that was suspected to be a granuloma. The patient was admitted for an abdominal CT scan and the results confirmed a circular cystic mass with homogeneous fluid content, close to the surgical clips of the previous surgery, resembling a “neo-gallbladder” (Figure 1). Although the patient had no signs of inflammation or infection, a hepatic abscess was suspected based on imaging results and previous surgical history. To better define the patient’s unclear clinical condition, we chose to perform a surgical drainage instead of a percutaneous (US- or CT-guided). Therefore, the patient underwent laparoscopic abdominal exploration, incision of the hepatic bed mass, and drainage of amorphous, brown, dense material (Figure 2). A drain was left in the liver bed and was removed on the 2st postoperative day. Histological examination reported protein-based amorphous material with rare lymphocytes and macrophages. Culturing was negative for bacterial growth. After antibiotic prophylaxis with extended spectrum B-lactam, the patient was discharged without symptoms on the 4th postoperative day. The primary surgical report was evaluated for evidence of use of Gelita-Cel® Standard for hemostatic purposes. The 12-month follow-up was uneventful.
Figure 1.

Cystic lesion with homogeneous fluid content close to surgical clips resembling a “neo-gallbladder” (white arrow).

Figure 2.

(A) Intraoperative image of “neo-gallbladder”; (B) drainage of amorphous material.

Discussion

Bleeding can be a major intraoperative complication during surgical procedures. When conventional methods such as ligature and diathermocoagulation are ineffective for bleeding management, hemostatic agents (HA) can be used. In 1909, fibrin was described as an effective HA [1] and since then numerous hemostatic devices have been used such as topical thrombin, porcine collagen, and OC [5]. OC was first used for medical purposes in 1945 [2,3], and since then it has been widely used in surgery, with several forms available. OC is easy to use and has good biocompatibility and bactericidal properties [4]. OC is made of cellulose, which is a homopolysaccharide of glucopyranose polymerized through β-glucosidic bonds [6,7]. Cellulose can be either regenerated to form organized fibers or non-regenerated with unorganized fibers prior to oxidation. When cellulose fibres are oxidized, conversion of hydroxyl groups to carboxylic acid groups occurs, yielding polyuronic acid [6,7]. The low pH of the carboxylic acid groups is responsible for several actions: primary local hemostyptic action, secondary platelet activation to form a temporary platelet plug [6,7], and hostile acidic environmental conditions for bacterial survival [8]. Moreover, the knit structure and thickness of the gauge is responsible for bactericidal properties, with thinner loose-knit patterns being less effective than thicker tight-knit patterns against antibiotic-resistant microorganisms [9]. Oxidized regenerated cellulose (ROC) is a re-absorbable material that can be intentionally left in the surgical field. In vivo studies on rats were performed to analyze the tissue reaction to locally implanted hemostatic agents [10]. ROC absorption starts after 24–48 h; at day 7 the gauze is surrounded by inflammatory granulation tissue, and complete degradation occurs between 4–8 weeks [6,10,11]. However, absorption is not always complete, with consequent gauze retention as first described by Vanderhoof et al. [12]. Therefore, it is common for ROC to appear as a mass during the immediate postoperative period, mimicking a postoperative abscess [13], tumor [14], or hematoma [15], posing a serious challenge in differential diagnosis [16]. On CT scan, a retained OC may appear as a mixed- or low-attenuation mass containing a focal central collection of gas, located inside or near the operative site, with a faint enhancement at the mass periphery and absence of air-fluid levels [13,17,18] (Table 1). Over time, the central collection of air is completely replaced by soft tissue, leading to the formation of a foreign-body granuloma [13].
Table 1.

Imaging features of OC retention.

TechniqueMain characteristics
US– Complex mass– Well-encapsulated hypoisoechoic lesion– Circumscribed margins– Internal hyperechoic nodules (“ile-flottante”)– Perilesional vascularization (Doppler)
CT scan– Mixed-/low-attenuation mass– Focal central collection of gas– Absence of air-fluid levels– Peripherical faint enhancement– Proximity to the surgical site
MRI– Nonspecific– Hypointense stripes inside cystic-like cavity on T2
PET/CT– Image with high glucose uptake– False-positive
MRI findings are nonspecific, but the presence of hypoin-tense stripes inside a cystic-like cavity on T2-weighted images is considered to be a characteristic sign of ROC-associated granuloma [19]. PET/CT images may produce false-positive results in case of foreign body granuloma as a consequence of localized inflammation, mimicking malignant tissue glucose uptake [20-22]. Retained OC is frequently found in ultrasound imaging (US) as a complex mass or well-encapsulated hypo-isoechoic lesion with circumscribed margins and internal hyperechoic nodules at the surgical site [23]. The presence of hyper-isoechoic nodules within a complex cystic mass can be explained as typical granulomatous foreign body reaction induced by the presence of ROC and was described by Giuliani et al. as “ileflottante” [23,24]. Moreover, the use of color/power Doppler should be considered as part of the ultrasound procedure. A perilesional vascularization is probably indicative of compression exerted by OC on neighboring tissues or connected to the presence of granulation tissue around the surgical site [25,26]. Nevertheless, imaging can be useful and clinical evaluation is fundamental in confirming diagnostic suspicion. We reviewed the literature and retrieved a total of 28 papers comprising 38 cases of OC retention. The details of cases are shown in Table 2. Surgical sites included: brain (6), cervical spine (1), thoracic spine (1), thorax (10), abdomen (12), and pelvis (8). Twenty-nine patients received Surgicel ®, 2 received Oxycel®, 1 received Surgiflo® (Johnson and Johnson, Somerville, NJ, USA), and 6 received non-specified OC (Table 2). Here, we report the first case of complications due to Gelita-Cel® retention.
Table 2.

Reported cases of OC retaining complications in the literature.

AuthorYearAgeSexDeviceSurgical SitePrimary diagnosisPrimary surgeryTime (days)SymptomsSuspectRemoval
Dutton et al. [32]198335MSurgicelBrainHead injuryFrontotemporal skull and lacerated left frontal lobe repair2,5 hVision impairmentHematomaYes
Perez-Guerra et al. [31]198459FSurgicelThoraxSquamous cell carcinomaLeft pneumonectomy2 hParaplegiaCord compressionYes
Ito et al. [39]1989n.a.n.a.OCBrainIntracranial meningiomaIntracranial meningioma removal390IncidentalLarge granulomaYes
Ito et al. [39]1989n.a.n.a.OCBrainIntracranial meningiomaIntracranial meningioma removal630IncidentalLarge granulomaYes
Ito et al. [39]1989n.a.n.a.OCBrainAnterior communicating artery aneurysmVascular treatmentn.a.IncidentalLarge granulomaYes
Short [28]199072FOCThoraxBronchogenic carcinomaRight upper/middle lobectomyfew daysParaplegiaCord compressionYes
Short [28]199049MOCThoraxLung adenocarcinomaRight upper lobectomy2ParaplegiaCord compressionYes
Short [28]199059MOCThoraxBronchogenic carcinomaRight lower lobectomy3,5 hParaplegiaCord compressionYes
Bradley et al. [40]199158MOxycelAbdomenCholecystitisCholecystectomy120IncidentalAbscess/HematomaNo
Deger et al. [41]199571FSurgicelAbdomenOvary serous adenocarcinomaOvariectomy150Abdominal discomfortTumor recurrenceYes
Sandhu et al. [42]1996n.a.n.a.SurgicelBrainIntracranial meningiomaIntracranial meningioma removal60IncidentalTumor recurrenceYes
Sandhu et al. [42]1996n.a.n.a.SurgicelBrainIntracranial meningiomaIntracranial meningioma removal360IncidentalTumor recurrenceYes
Iwabuchi et al. [43]199746FSurgicelThoraxn.a.Right lower lobectomy1Paraplegian.a.Yes
Concha et al. [37]199741FSurgicelAbdomenKidney failureKidney transplant570Fever, abdominal pain, renal function impairmentGranuloma/neoplasiaYes, allograft extirpation
Banerjee et al. [44]199828MSurgicelSpinalDisk degeneration, spinal stenosisSpinal decompression2Cauda equina syndromeCord compressionYes
Lovstad et al. [29]199956FSurgicelThoraxLung tumorLeft lower lobectomy2,5 hParaplegiaCord compressionYes
Azmy [35]20012MSurgicelAbdomenNeuroblastomaRight adenectomy4IncidentalTumor recurrenceYes
Ibrahim et al. [45]200253FSurgicelThoraxAortic root aneurysmAortic root replacement42IncidentalAbscessYes
Gao et al. [46]200237FSurgicelPelvicHemoperitoneum, ruptured corpus luteumHysterectomy, right salpingo-oophorectomy30Abdominal pain, vaginal dischargeGranulomaYes
Brodbelt et al. [27]200237FSurgicelThoraxMetastatic sarcomaLung lobectomy1ParaplegiaExtradural massNo
Brodbelt et al. [27]200250MSurgicelThoraxThoracic traumaThoracic surgery3Weakness/numbness right legExtradural massYes
Brodbelt et al. [27]200215 (m)MSurgicelThoraxn.a.Cardiac surgery2Flaccid paraparesis, extradural massExtradural massYes
Farina Perez et al. [47]200463FSurgicelAbdomenRenal cell carcinomaLaparoscopic partial necrectomy8IncidentalGas collectionNo
Somani et al. [34]200562FSurgicelAbdomenMyelofibrosisSplenectomy540Renal tumor suspectKidney tumorYes, necrectomy
Arnold et al. [38]200755MSurgicelAbdomenn.a.Cholecystectomy4Abdominal painPostoperative abscessNo
Salmo et al. [48]2009n.a.MOxycelAbdomenRectal cancerColon resection90IncidentalTumor recurrenceYes
Agarwal et al. [49]201047MSurgicelAbdomenRenal cystLaparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery90IncidentalKidney massNo
Royds et al. [36]201256FSurgicelCervicalMultinodular goiterTotal thyroidectomy30Wound swellingSuture abscessYes
Tefik et al. [50]201250FSurgicelAbdomenCystic papillary renal cell carcinomaLaparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery180IncidentalHeterogeneous massYes
Wang et al. [51]201383MSurgicelAbdomenGISTRecurrent GIST120GIST recurrenceHeterogeneous massYes
Behbehani et al. [52]201347FSurgicelPelvicUterine leiomyomaLaparoscopic total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy21Pelvic pain, feverPostoperative abscessNo
Behbehani et al. [52]201346FSurgicelPelvicUterine leiomyoma and adenomyosisLaparoscopic total hysterectomy10Abdominal pain, feverPostoperative abscessYes
Tam et al. [53]201450FSurgicelPelvicEndometriosisLaparoscopic hysterectomy6Pelvic painGas collectionNo
Tam et al. [53]201445FSurgicelPelvicEndometriosisRobotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, left salpingo-oophorectomy, right salpingectomy, appendectomy10Abdominal pain, vaginal dischargeAbscessNo
Tam et al. [53]201443FSurgicelPelvicEndometriosisLaparoscopic hysterectomy, left oophorectomy, bilateral salpingectomy4MalaiseAbscessNo
Zhang et al. [54]201521FSurgicelPelvicSymptomatic ovarian cystOvarian cystectomy7Pelvic painHeterogeneous massNo
Cormio et al. [55]201667FSurgicelPelvicCystocele, anterior genital prolapsePubovaginal sling, cystocele repair180Irritative voiding symptomsOvarian cancerYes
Singh et al. [56]201671MSurgifloAbdomenClear cell carcinomaLeft robotic partial nephrectomy30Nodular lesionRecurrence/residual tumorNo
The preoperative diagnosis and surgical procedure are described in Table 2. The times from primary surgery to detection of retained OC ranged between 2 hours and 630 days. Twelve cases were incidental and the others were symptomatic. Various symptoms were described, ranging from malaise and fever to paraplegia, cauda equina syndrome, and vision impairment. Diagnostic suspicion was tumor recurrence (6), abscess (7), cord compression (6), granuloma (4), extradural mass (3), heterogeneous mass (3), gas collection (2), kidney tumor (2), ovarian cancer (1), hematoma (1), abscess/hematoma (1), granuloma/neoplasm (1), and non-specified lesion (1). Gauze removal was performed in 27 cases. In 2 patients, removal of the gauze required a major procedure: 1 patient underwent nephrectomy and another had allograft extirpation that resulted in need for dialysis. Despite the fundamental importance of OC as an essential hemostatic agent in surgery, some precautions are needed to avoid future complications. Although 38 cases, in addition to our reported case, are very few compared to all surgical procedures performed with OC use with no associated complication, complications may also be severe and associated with risky surgical procedures. Our review of the literature found that 8 patients experienced paraplegia, which occurred between 2 hours and 2 days after thoracic surgery [27-29]; cord compression was suspected and urgent laminectomy was performed, revealing a mass of Surgicel® in the extradural space. A surgical report showed the use of OC to control difficult bleeding from the posterior angle of the thoracotomy incision. The posterior end of the rib adjacent to the gaping thoracostomy is usually a bleeding site that is hard to manage. During thoracostomy closure, the rib approximation may produce a compressive force on the OC, forcing it to migrate into the adjacent foramen. The established negative pressure of the intravertebral subdural space can enhance this pressure gradient and cause OC herniation with consequent symptomatology [26]. Product information warns against leaving OC in situ next to foramina after hemostasis due to swelling, which can result in nerve damage due to pressure in a bony confined area [30]. However, there is no report regarding the potential of material migration. Five out of 6 patients presented with total motor and sensory deficit, with extension according to the cord compression site [27-29]: one had spastic monoplegia involving the right leg [28], one patient has to use a cane to walk [27], and one has walking impairment requiring leg braces and obligatory catheterization [27]. In circumstances requiring extensive dissection in the costovertebral angle, precise technique is imperative. Uncontrolled or poorly controlled bleeding in an intervertebral foramen should be an indication for consultation of a neurological surgeon. Dutton et al. [32] reported a case of compressive optic neuropathy after OC migration from the anterior cranial fossa into the orbital apex through an orbital roof fracture. Banerjee et al. [33] reported a case of cauda equina syndrome treated with OC removal and consequent severe impairment of quality of life. To avoid major complications, particular attention must be paid to hemostatic control in rigid inextensible anatomical structures such as the skull and spinal cord. In 9 cases, tumor mass or neoplasm recurrence was suspected, with consequent resective treatment. Somani et al. [34] reported a case of clinically/radiologically suspected renal cell carcinoma in a patient who previously underwent splenectomy for myelofibrosis, evidenced as an heterogenous kidney mass formation on abdominal CT scan with paraortic lymph-adenopathy. Nephrectomy was performed, but histology did not show a neoplasm and instead found a foreign-material granuloma. This is an important case of retained OC mimicking a neoplasm. Azmy et al. [35] reported a case of OC removal in a patient suspected to have a recurrence of neuroblastoma. Royds et al. [36] documented the first case of local tissue reaction associated with Surgicel® in head and neck surgery, with removal and resolution confirming its cause. Concha et al. [37] reported a case of xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis caused by OC retention in a renal allograft, with consequent extirpation of the allograft and return to dialysis in a 41-year-old patient. Arnold et al. [38] documented an abscess mimicking a mass following cholecystectomy and liver biopsy. Among all 38 cases described, plus our reported case, 11 patients were treated conservatively due to suspicion of an OC-retaining lesion after surgical history evaluation and multidisciplinary analysis by surgeons and radiologists. Although retained OC has been described by many authors [27-29,31,32,34-56], we believe it is important to focus on the cases in which there were severe complications in order to form some conclusions and recommendations The manufacturers recommend OC removal after hemostasis is obtained. If the surgeon decides to leave an OC gauze in situ, it should be used sparingly, as many problems have been attributed to excessive use [45]. If OC is left in situ, the surgical report and the discharge document should state it in order to correctly inform the patient in detail about this condition. In surgical procedures in rigid inextensible anatomical structures as the skull, spinal cord, and pleural cavity (in proximity to the spine), OC should be used with extreme care and, if possible, neurosurgical support should be used for better and safer hemostasis [32] (Table 3).
Table 3.

Practical suggestions for safe use of OC.

Practical suggestion
– Remove OC after hemostasis
– If left in situ, use it sparingly
– Report the use of OC in the surgical report
– Inform the patient about OC retention
– Use extreme care in rigid non-extensive anatomical structures (eventual neurosurgical aid)
– Accurate surgical history evaluation
Moreover, when a mass is observed, accurate imaging evaluation and surgical history are required to assess a possible retained granulomatous lesion and to provide the best medical/surgical treatment. Further studies are needed to determine if layer versus coiled disposal of oxidized cellulose may have a role in complications and to assess whether fibrillar oxidized cellulose is safer than the gauze form. Our surgical case report is fully compliant with the SCARE criteria [57].

Conclusions

Bleeding is a major intraoperative complication during surgical procedures. OC is an effective aid in hemostasis when ligature and diathermocoagulation are ineffective. Despite biocompatibility and reabsorption, cases of retained OC complications have been described in the literature. OC should be removed when hemostasis is obtained. If necessary, only a small quantity of OC should be placed in situ and it should be documented in the surgical report and the discharge document in order to correctly inform the patient. Accurate surgical history evaluation should always be performed, and multidisciplinary case evaluation between surgeons and radiologists should be done to achieve a more accurate diagnosis and prevent unnecessary revision surgery or further medical and/or surgical interventions. In case of surgical procedures with hemostatic control in rigid inextensible anatomical structures such as the skull and spinal cord, OC should be used with extreme care in order to avoid major complications and, if possible, neurosurgical support should be used for better and safer hemostasis. We also presented the first case of a complication following Gelita-Cel® retention in a case of “neo-gallbladder”. Our aim here is not to criticize the use of OC as hemostatic agent – it has well-documented effectiveness in surgery – but rather to provide some practical suggestions on how to avoid the severe complications reported in the literature.
  52 in total

1.  Intraspinal oxidised cellulose (Surgicel) causing delayed paraplegia after thoracotomy--a report of three cases.

Authors:  A R Brodbelt; J B Miles; P M Foy; J C Broome
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  A foreign body reaction to Surgicel mimicking an abscess following cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Mohamed F Ibrahim; Christopher Aps; Christopher P Young
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Paraplegia associated with the use of oxidized cellulose in posterolateral thoracotomy incisions.

Authors:  H D Short
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  The use of hemostatic agents and sealants in urology.

Authors:  Y Mark Hong; Kevin R Loughlin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Case report: an oxidized cellulose granuloma--another hepatic pseudotumour?

Authors:  M Bradley; G Singh
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Oxidized regenerated cellulose granuloma mimicking recurrent mass lesion after laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery.

Authors:  Tzevat Tefik; Oner Sanli; Tayfun Oktar; Omer Baris Yucel; Yasemin Ozluk; Isin Kilicaslan
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2012-03-14

7.  Paraplegia after thoracotomy--not caused by the epidural catheter.

Authors:  R Z Løvstad; P A Steen; M Forsman
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.105

8.  Surgicel: its fate following implantation.

Authors:  A M Pierce; O W Wiebkin; D F Wilson
Journal:  J Oral Pathol       Date:  1984-12

9.  Nonabsorbable suture granuloma mimicking ovarian cancer recurrence at combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography evaluation: a case report.

Authors:  Ludovica Imperiale; Claudia Marchetti; Laura Salerno; Roberta Iadarola; Carlotta Bracchi; Laura Vertechy; Lucia di Francesco; Angela Musella; Elisa Bevilacqua; Primo Pennesi; Innocenza Palaia; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2014-06-18

10.  Oxidized regenerated cellulose resembling vaginal cuff abscess.

Authors:  Teresa Tam; Gerald Harkins; Thomas Dykes; Allison Gockley; Matthew Davies
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Application and outlook of topical hemostatic materials: a narrative review.

Authors:  Yuting Zhong; Huayu Hu; Ningning Min; Yufan Wei; Xiangdong Li; Xiru Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

2.  The efficacy of oxidized regenerated cellulose (SurgiGuard®) in breast cancer patients who undergo total mastectomy with node surgery: A prospective randomized study in 94 patients.

Authors:  Kug Hyun Nam; Joon-Hyop Lee; Yoo Seung Chung; Yong Soon Chun; Heung Kyu Park; Yun Yeong Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  A Composite Hydrogel Based on Pectin/Cellulose via Chemical Cross-Linking for Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Wancheng Chen; Sijie Yuan; Jie Shen; Yongsheng Chen; Yang Xiao
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-02

4.  Exploring Adverse Events and Utilization of Topical Hemostatic Agents in Surgery.

Authors:  Katherine A O'Hanlan; Paul Bassett
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.789

Review 5.  Safety considerations in laparoscopic surgery: A narrative review.

Authors:  Brij Madhok; Kushan Nanayakkara; Kamal Mahawar
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-01-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.