Literature DB >> 29990524

Doggy bags and downsizing: Packaging uneaten food to go after a meal attenuates the portion size effect in women.

Faris M Zuraikat1, Liane S Roe1, Alissa D Smethers1, Barbara J Rolls2.   

Abstract

Serving larger portions leads to increased food and energy intake, but little is known about strategies to moderate this response. This study tested how the effect of portion size on meal intake was influenced by providing the option to take away uneaten food in a "doggy bag" (to-go container). Women were randomly assigned to one of two subject groups: a To-Go Group (n = 27) that was informed before each meal that their leftover food would be packaged to take away after the meal, and a Control Group (n = 26) that was not given this option. In a crossover design, subjects came to the lab once a week for four weeks to eat a dinner composed of five foods. Across meals, the portion size of all foods was varied (100%, 125%, 150%, and 175% of baseline). Results showed that the portion size effect, defined as the trajectory of intake across the weight of food served, differed significantly by subject group (P ≤ 0.025). In the Control Group, increasing the portion size of all foods led to substantial increases in intake (P < 0.0001); for every 100 g added to the baseline portion, women in this group consumed an additional mean (±SEM) of 64 ± 12 g of food and 90 ± 19 kcal, until intake leveled off. In contrast, intake of women in the To-Go Group increased by only 17 ± 12 g and 19 ± 18 kcal for every additional 100 g served; these increases did not differ significantly from zero (P > 0.15). Thus, the effect of portion size on intake was attenuated in the To-Go Group compared to the Control Group. These data indicate that packaging uneaten food after a meal could be an effective strategy to reduce overconsumption from large portions.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Doggy bag; Energy intake; Food waste; Leftovers; Portion size; To-go container

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29990524      PMCID: PMC6092958          DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  43 in total

1.  Effects of age on sensory-specific satiety.

Authors:  B J Rolls; T M McDermott
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  Portion size and obesity.

Authors:  M Barbara E Livingstone; L Kirsty Pourshahidi
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 3.  Sensory-specific satiety.

Authors:  B J Rolls
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 7.110

4.  Increased portion size leads to a sustained increase in energy intake over 4 d in normal-weight and overweight men and women.

Authors:  Mary T Kelly; Julie M W Wallace; Paula J Robson; Kirsten L Rennie; Robert W Welch; Mary P Hannon-Fletcher; Sarah Brennan; Adrian Fletcher; M B E Livingstone
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  What is eaten when all of the foods at a meal are served in large portions?

Authors:  Liane S Roe; Samantha M R Kling; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Portion size: a qualitative study of consumers' attitudes toward point-of-purchase interventions aimed at portion size.

Authors:  Willemijn M Vermeer; Ingrid H M Steenhuis; Jacob C Seidell
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2009-09-11

7.  Downsizing: policy options to reduce portion sizes to help tackle obesity.

Authors:  Theresa M Marteau; Gareth J Hollands; Ian Shemilt; Susan A Jebb
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-12-02

Review 8.  A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of eating rate on energy intake and hunger.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Eva Almiron-Roig; Femke Rutters; Cees de Graaf; Ciarán G Forde; Catrin Tudur Smith; Sarah J Nolan; Susan A Jebb
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 9.  Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; Ian Shemilt; Theresa M Marteau; Susan A Jebb; Hannah B Lewis; Yinghui Wei; Julian P T Higgins; David Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-14

Review 10.  Opportunities and barriers for smaller portions in food service: lessons from marketing and behavioral economics.

Authors:  J Riis
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.095

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Potential moderators of the portion size effect.

Authors:  Faris M Zuraikat; Alissa D Smethers; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2019-03-01

2.  Individual differences and moderating participant characteristics in the effect of reducing portion size on meal energy intake: Pooled analysis of three randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Ashleigh Haynes
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.868

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.