Literature DB >> 29989938

Automated In Vivo Sub-Hertz Analysis of Viscoelasticity (SAVE) for Evaluation of Breast Lesions.

Mahdi Bayat, Alireza Nabavizadeh, Viksit Kumar, Adriana Gregory, Michael Insana, Azra Alizad, Mostafa Fatemi.   

Abstract

We present an automated method for acquiring images and contrast parameters based on mechanical properties of breast lesions and surrounding tissue at load frequencies less than 1 Hz. The method called sub-Hertz analysis of viscoelasticity (SAVE) uses a compression device integrated with ultrasound imaging to perform in vivo ramp-and-hold uniaxial creep-like test on human breast in vivo. It models the internal deformations of tissues under constant surface stress as a linear viscoelastic response. We first discuss different aspects of our unique measurement approach and the expected variability of the viscoelastic parameters estimated based on a simplified one-dimensional reconstruction model. Finite-element numerical analysis is used to justify the advantages of using imaging contrast over viscoelasticity values. We then present the results of SAVE applied to a group of patients with breast masses undergoing biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29989938      PMCID: PMC6043422          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2787679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  20 in total

1.  Sonoelastography for 1,786 non-palpable breast masses: diagnostic value in the decision to biopsy.

Authors:  Ann Yi; Nariya Cho; Jung Min Chang; Hye Ryoung Koo; Bo La Yun; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Sonographic breast elastography: a primer.

Authors:  Richard G Barr
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Timothy J Hall; Amy M Sommer; Gina K Hesley; Gale A Sisney; William E Svensson; Jason P Fine; Jinfeng Jiang; Nicholas J Hangiandreou
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Breast ultrasound elastography--results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  F K W Schaefer; I Heer; P J Schaefer; C Mundhenke; S Osterholz; B M Order; N Hofheinz; J Hedderich; M Heller; W Jonat; I Schreer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Fundamental limitations on the contrast-transfer efficiency in elastography: an analytic study.

Authors:  F Kallel; M Bertrand; J Ophir
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Elastostatics of a spherical inclusion in homogeneous biological media.

Authors:  M Bilgen; M F Insana
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Suitability of poroelastic and viscoelastic mechanical models for high and low frequency MR elastography.

Authors:  M D J McGarry; C L Johnson; B P Sutton; J G Georgiadis; E E W Van Houten; A J Pattison; J B Weaver; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Automated Compression Device for Viscoelasticity Imaging.

Authors:  Alireza Nabavizadeh; Randall R Kinnick; Mahdi Bayat; Carolina Amador; Matthew W Urban; Azra Alizad; Mostafa Fatemi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Indentation Analysis of Biphasic Viscoelastic Hydrogels.

Authors:  K S Toohey; S Kalyanam; J Palaniappan; M F Insana
Journal:  Mech Mater       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  Ultrasonic viscoelasticity imaging of nonpalpable breast tumors: preliminary results.

Authors:  Yupeng Qiu; Mallika Sridhar; Jean K Tsou; Karen K Lindfors; Michael F Insana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  4 in total

1.  Viscoelastic parameters as discriminators of breast masses: Initial human study results.

Authors:  Viksit Kumar; Max Denis; Adriana Gregory; Mahdi Bayat; Mohammad Mehrmohammadi; Robert Fazzio; Mostafa Fatemi; Azra Alizad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  The interplay between physical cues and mechanosensitive ion channels in cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Kaustav Bera; Alexander Kiepas; Yuqi Zhang; Sean X Sun; Konstantinos Konstantopoulos
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-09-07

3.  Effects of Loading and Boundary Conditions on the Performance of Ultrasound Compressional Viscoelastography: A Computational Simulation Study to Guide Experimental Design.

Authors:  Che-Yu Lin; Ke-Vin Chang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 4.  Why Are Viscosity and Nonlinearity Bound to Make an Impact in Clinical Elastographic Diagnosis?

Authors:  Guillermo Rus; Inas H Faris; Jorge Torres; Antonio Callejas; Juan Melchor
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.