OBJECTIVES: Temporal enhanced ultrasound (TeUS) is a new ultrasound-based imaging technique that provides tissue-specific information. Recent studies have shown the potential of TeUS for improving tissue characterization in prostate cancer diagnosis. We study the temporal properties of TeUS-temporal order and length-and present a new framework to assess their impact on tissue information. METHODS: We utilize a probabilistic modeling approach using hidden Markov models (HMMs) to capture the temporal signatures of malignant and benign tissues from TeUS signals of nine patients. We model signals of benign and malignant tissues (284 and 286 signals, respectively) in their original temporal order as well as under order permutations. We then compare the resulting models using the Kullback-Liebler divergence and assess their performance differences in characterization. Moreover, we train HMMs using TeUS signals of different durations and compare their model performance when differentiating tissue types. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrate that models of order-preserved signals perform statistically significantly better (85% accuracy) in tissue characterization compared to models of order-altered signals (62% accuracy). The performance degrades as more changes in signal order are introduced. Additionally, models trained on shorter sequences perform as accurately as models of longer sequences. CONCLUSION: The work presented here strongly indicates that temporal order has substantial impact on TeUS performance; thus, it plays a significant role in conveying tissue-specific information. Furthermore, shorter TeUS signals can relay sufficient information to accurately distinguish between tissue types. SIGNIFICANCE: Understanding the impact of TeUS properties facilitates the process of its adopting in diagnostic procedures and provides insights on improving its acquisition.
OBJECTIVES: Temporal enhanced ultrasound (TeUS) is a new ultrasound-based imaging technique that provides tissue-specific information. Recent studies have shown the potential of TeUS for improving tissue characterization in prostate cancer diagnosis. We study the temporal properties of TeUS-temporal order and length-and present a new framework to assess their impact on tissue information. METHODS: We utilize a probabilistic modeling approach using hidden Markov models (HMMs) to capture the temporal signatures of malignant and benign tissues from TeUS signals of nine patients. We model signals of benign and malignant tissues (284 and 286 signals, respectively) in their original temporal order as well as under order permutations. We then compare the resulting models using the Kullback-Liebler divergence and assess their performance differences in characterization. Moreover, we train HMMs using TeUS signals of different durations and compare their model performance when differentiating tissue types. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrate that models of order-preserved signals perform statistically significantly better (85% accuracy) in tissue characterization compared to models of order-altered signals (62% accuracy). The performance degrades as more changes in signal order are introduced. Additionally, models trained on shorter sequences perform as accurately as models of longer sequences. CONCLUSION: The work presented here strongly indicates that temporal order has substantial impact on TeUS performance; thus, it plays a significant role in conveying tissue-specific information. Furthermore, shorter TeUS signals can relay sufficient information to accurately distinguish between tissue types. SIGNIFICANCE: Understanding the impact of TeUS properties facilitates the process of its adopting in diagnostic procedures and provides insights on improving its acquisition.
Authors: H Ballentine Carter; Peter C Albertsen; Michael J Barry; Ruth Etzioni; Stephen J Freedland; Kirsten Lynn Greene; Lars Holmberg; Philip Kantoff; Badrinath R Konety; Mohammad Hassan Murad; David F Penson; Anthony L Zietman Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Eli Gibson; Cathie Crukley; Mena Gaed; José A Gómez; Madeleine Moussa; Joseph L Chin; Glenn S Bauman; Aaron Fenster; Aaron D Ward Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Eric A Singer; Aradhana Kaushal; Baris Turkbey; Anna Couvillon; Peter A Pinto; Howard L Parnes Journal: Curr Opin Oncol Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 3.645
Authors: Peter A Pinto; Paul H Chung; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Angelo A Baccala; Jochen Kruecker; Compton J Benjamin; Sheng Xu; Pingkun Yan; Samuel Kadoury; Celene Chua; Julia K Locklin; Baris Turkbey; Joanna H Shih; Stacey P Gates; Carey Buckner; Gennady Bratslavsky; W Marston Linehan; Neil D Glossop; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-08-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jonathan I Epstein; Lars Egevad; Mahul B Amin; Brett Delahunt; John R Srigley; Peter A Humphrey Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Geoffrey A Sonn; Shyam Natarajan; Daniel J A Margolis; Malu MacAiran; Patricia Lieu; Jiaoti Huang; Frederick J Dorey; Leonard S Marks Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jeffrey J Tosoian; Meera Chappidi; Zhaoyong Feng; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Misop Han; Christian P Pavlovich; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Bruce J Trock Journal: BJU Int Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 5.588