Literature DB >> 29988234

'CLOSE'-Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Changes in Local Bipolar and Unipolar Atrial Electrograms: Observations from the EP Lab.

Mathieu Coeman1,2, Milad El Haddad1,2, Michael Wol2, Rajin Choudhury2, Yves Vandekerckhove2, Rajin Choudhury2, Sebastien Knecht2, Rene Tavernier2, Mattias Duytschaever1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: 'CLOSE'-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a point-by-point, contact force (CF)-guided radiofrequency (RF) approach aiming to enclose the PVs with contiguous RF lesions by targeting strict criteria for interlesion distance and ablation index (AI). We characterized real-time changes in bipolar (B-EGMs) and unipolar electrograms (U-EGMs) during AI-targeted RF delivery.
METHODS: EGM changes during 56 RF applications in 7 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing 'CLOSE'-guided PVI were studied. CF-guided RF was delivered with 35W targeting an AI of 400 at posterior and 550 at anterior wall. 336 B-EGMs and 336 U-EGMs before, during and after RF delivery were analyzed with their RF characteristics. Amplitude of the B-and U-EGM and morphology of the U-EGM were measured at each 5-second step using custom-made software.
RESULTS: We observed a significant reduction in B-EGM amplitude (0.43 [IQR=0.25, 0.55] to 0.11 [0.07, 0.22] mV, p<0.001) and U-EGM amplitude (0.57 [0.40, 0.87] to 0.22 [0.10, 0.34] mV, p<0.001) within 5 seconds, after which no more changes were observed. Impedance drop was 18.3±1.1Ω. Loss of the unipolar terminal S-wave occurred in 59% of applications. There was no correlation between U-EGM morphology changes and RF characteristics.
CONCLUSION: In AI-guided RF delivery there is a significant reduction in EGM amplitude within 5 seconds. Loss of the unipolar terminal S wave occurred in 59% of applications and was not related to RF characteristics suggestive of adequate lesion formation. These findings suggest that there is a limited value in monitoring electrograms to further optimize 'CLOSE'-guided PVI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Contact force; Electrogram

Year:  2018        PMID: 29988234      PMCID: PMC6006975          DOI: 10.4022/jafib.1794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation        ISSN: 1941-6911


  20 in total

1.  Identification of transmural necrosis along a linear catheter ablation lesion during atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm.

Authors:  Javier E Sanchez; G Neal Kay; Michael E Benser; Jeffrey A Hall; Gregory P Walcott; William M Smith; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Local unipolar and bipolar electrogram criteria for evaluating the transmurality of atrial ablation lesions at different catheter orientations relative to the endocardial surface.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Otomo; Kikuya Uno; Hideomi Fujiwara; Mitsuaki Isobe; Yoshito Iesaka
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 3.  Clinical use of cooled radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  John A Vest; Jens Seiler; William G Stevenson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-05-09

4.  In vivo ventricular lesion growth in radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Authors:  T A Simmers; F H Wittkampf; R N Hauer; E O Robles de Medina
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  Catheter ablation treatment in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation: a prospective, multi-centre, randomized, controlled study (Catheter Ablation For The Cure Of Atrial Fibrillation Study).

Authors:  Giuseppe Stabile; Emanuele Bertaglia; Gaetano Senatore; Antonio De Simone; Franco Zoppo; Giovanni Donnici; Pietro Turco; Pietro Pascotto; Massimo Fazzari; Dino Franco Vitale
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Maximal electrogram attenuation recorded from mini electrodes embedded on 4.5-mm irrigated and 8-mm nonirrigated catheters signifies lesion maturation.

Authors:  Boaz Avitall; Piotr Horbal; David Vance; Josef Koblish; Arthur Kalinski
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-12-02

7.  Randomized trial comparing pulmonary vein isolation using the SmartTouch catheter with or without real-time contact force data.

Authors:  Waqas Ullah; Ailsa McLean; Muzahir H Tayebjee; Dhiraj Gupta; Matthew R Ginks; Guy A Haywood; Mark O'Neill; Pier D Lambiase; Mark J Earley; Richard J Schilling
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 6.343

8.  Determinants of Acute and Late Pulmonary Vein Reconnection in Contact Force-Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Identifying the Weakest Link in the Ablation Chain.

Authors:  Milad El Haddad; Philippe Taghji; Thomas Phlips; Michael Wolf; Anthony Demolder; Rajin Choudhury; Sébastien Knecht; Yves Vandekerckhove; Rene Tavernier; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Mattias Duytschaever
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-04

9.  Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: segmental pulmonary vein ostial ablation versus left atrial ablation.

Authors:  Hakan Oral; Christoph Scharf; Aman Chugh; Burr Hall; Peter Cheung; Eric Good; Srikar Veerareddy; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Control of radiofrequency lesion size by power regulation.

Authors:  F H Wittkampf; R N Hauer; E O Robles de Medina
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

1.  Continuous and discontinuous radiofrequency energy delivery on the atrial free wall: Lesion transmurality, width, and biophysical characteristics.

Authors:  Daniel J Friedman; Jed A Overmann; Jeffrey M Fish; Stephen A Gaeta; John H Tranter; Riki Thao; Jonathan P Piccini
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-11-06

2.  Second Generation Cryoballoon vs. Radiofrequency Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Outcomes Beyond One-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Galizia Brito V; Vecchio N; Tomas L; Jarma Jj; Mondragon I; Burgos L; Ordoñez S; Rivera S; Albina G; Giniger A; Scazzuso F
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2019-04-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.