Here we present an optimized workflow for global proteome and phosphoproteome analysis of tissues or cell lines that uses isobaric tags (TMT (tandem mass tags)-10) for multiplexed analysis and relative quantification, and provides 3× higher throughput than iTRAQ (isobaric tags for absolute and relative quantification)-4-based methods with high intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility. The workflow was systematically characterized and benchmarked across three independent laboratories using two distinct breast cancer subtypes from patient-derived xenograft models to enable assessment of proteome and phosphoproteome depth and quantitative reproducibility. Each plex consisted of ten samples, each being 300 μg of peptide derived from <50 mg of wet-weight tissue. Of the 10,000 proteins quantified per sample, we could distinguish 7,700 human proteins derived from tumor cells and 3100 mouse proteins derived from the surrounding stroma and blood. The maximum deviation across replicates and laboratories was <7%, and the inter-laboratory correlation for TMT ratio-based comparison of the two breast cancer subtypes was r > 0.88. The maximum deviation for the phosphoproteome coverage was <24% across laboratories, with an average of >37,000 quantified phosphosites per sample and differential quantification correlations of r > 0.72. The full procedure, including sample processing and data generation, can be completed within 10 d for ten tissue samples, and 100 samples can be analyzed in ~4 months using a single LC-MS/MS instrument. The high quality, depth, and reproducibility of the data obtained both within and across laboratories should enable new biological insights to be obtained from mass spectrometry-based proteomics analyses of cells and tissues together with proteogenomic data integration.
Here we present an optimized workflow for global proteome and phosphoproteome analysis of tissues or cell lines that uses isobaric tags (TMT (tandem mass tags)-10) for muln class="Gene">tiplexed analysis and relative quantification, and provides 3× higher throughput than iTRAQ (isobaric tags for absolute and relative quantification)-4-based methods with high intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility. The workflow was systematically characterized and benchmarked across three independent laboratories using two distinct breast cancer subtypes from patient-derived xenograft models to enable assessment of proteome and phosphoproteome depth and quantitative reproducibility. Each plex consisted of ten samples, each being 300 μg of peptide derived from <50 mg of wet-weight tissue. Of the 10,000 proteins quantified per sample, we could distinguish 7,700 human proteins derived from tumor cells and 3100 mouse proteins derived from the surrounding stroma and blood. The maximum deviation across replicates and laboratories was <7%, and the inter-laboratory correlation for TMT ratio-based comparison of the two breast cancer subtypes was r > 0.88. The maximum deviation for the phosphoproteome coverage was <24% across laboratories, with an average of >37,000 quantified phosphosites per sample and differential quantification correlations of r > 0.72. The full procedure, including sample processing and data generation, can be completed within 10 d for ten tissue samples, and 100 samples can be analyzed in ~4 months using a single LC-MS/MS instrument. The high quality, depth, and reproducibility of the data obtained both within and across laboratories should enable new biological insights to be obtained from mass spectrometry-based proteomics analyses of cells and tissues together with proteogenomic data integration.
Authors: Natasha A Karp; Wolfgang Huber; Pawel G Sadowski; Philip D Charles; Svenja V Hester; Kathryn S Lilley Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2010-04-10 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Ravi C Dwivedi; Vic Spicer; Michael Harder; Mihaela Antonovici; Werner Ens; Kenneth G Standing; John A Wilkins; Oleg V Krokhin Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2008-08-08 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Gitte Böhm; Petra Prefot; Stephan Jung; Stefan Selzer; Vikram Mitra; David Britton; Karsten Kuhn; Ian Pike; Andrew H Thompson Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Philipp Mertins; Jana W Qiao; Jinal Patel; Namrata D Udeshi; Karl R Clauser; D R Mani; Michael W Burgess; Michael A Gillette; Jacob D Jaffe; Steven A Carr Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2013-06-09 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Craig D Wenger; M Violet Lee; Alexander S Hebert; Graeme C McAlister; Douglas H Phanstiel; Michael S Westphall; Joshua J Coon Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2011-10-02 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Skye R S Fishbein; Francesca G Tomasi; Ian D Wolf; Charles L Dulberger; Albert Wang; Hasmik Keshishian; Luke Wallace; Steven A Carr; Thomas R Ioerger; E Hesper Rego; Eric J Rubin Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2020-12-23 Impact factor: 3.490
Authors: Karsten Krug; Philipp Mertins; Bin Zhang; Peter Hornbeck; Rajesh Raju; Rushdy Ahmad; Matthew Szucs; Filip Mundt; Dominique Forestier; Judit Jane-Valbuena; Hasmik Keshishian; Michael A Gillette; Pablo Tamayo; Jill P Mesirov; Jacob D Jaffe; Steven A Carr; D R Mani Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Jana Zecha; Shankha Satpathy; Tamara Kanashova; Shayan C Avanessian; M Harry Kane; Karl R Clauser; Philipp Mertins; Steven A Carr; Bernhard Kuster Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Lian Yi; Chia-Feng Tsai; Ercument Dirice; Adam C Swensen; Jing Chen; Tujin Shi; Marina A Gritsenko; Rosalie K Chu; Paul D Piehowski; Richard D Smith; Karin D Rodland; Mark A Atkinson; Clayton E Mathews; Rohit N Kulkarni; Tao Liu; Wei-Jun Qian Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Erik C B Johnson; Eric B Dammer; Duc M Duong; Lingyan Ping; Maotian Zhou; Luming Yin; Lenora A Higginbotham; Andrew Guajardo; Bartholomew White; Juan C Troncoso; Madhav Thambisetty; Thomas J Montine; Edward B Lee; John Q Trojanowski; Thomas G Beach; Eric M Reiman; Vahram Haroutunian; Minghui Wang; Eric Schadt; Bin Zhang; Dennis W Dickson; Nilüfer Ertekin-Taner; Todd E Golde; Vladislav A Petyuk; Philip L De Jager; David A Bennett; Thomas S Wingo; Srikant Rangaraju; Ihab Hajjar; Joshua M Shulman; James J Lah; Allan I Levey; Nicholas T Seyfried Journal: Nat Med Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Karsten Krug; Eric J Jaehnig; Shankha Satpathy; Lili Blumenberg; Alla Karpova; Meenakshi Anurag; George Miles; Philipp Mertins; Yifat Geffen; Lauren C Tang; David I Heiman; Song Cao; Yosef E Maruvka; Jonathan T Lei; Chen Huang; Ramani B Kothadia; Antonio Colaprico; Chet Birger; Jarey Wang; Yongchao Dou; Bo Wen; Zhiao Shi; Yuxing Liao; Maciej Wiznerowicz; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Xi Steven Chen; Jacob J Kennedy; Amanda G Paulovich; Mathangi Thiagarajan; Christopher R Kinsinger; Tara Hiltke; Emily S Boja; Mehdi Mesri; Ana I Robles; Henry Rodriguez; Thomas F Westbrook; Li Ding; Gad Getz; Karl R Clauser; David Fenyö; Kelly V Ruggles; Bing Zhang; D R Mani; Steven A Carr; Matthew J Ellis; Michael A Gillette Journal: Cell Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Romain Guièze; Vivian M Liu; Daniel Rosebrock; Alexis A Jourdain; María Hernández-Sánchez; Aina Martinez Zurita; Jing Sun; Elisa Ten Hacken; Kaitlyn Baranowski; Philip A Thompson; Jin-Mi Heo; Zachary Cartun; Ozan Aygün; J Bryan Iorgulescu; Wandi Zhang; Giulia Notarangelo; Dimitri Livitz; Shuqiang Li; Matthew S Davids; Anat Biran; Stacey M Fernandes; Jennifer R Brown; Ana Lako; Zoe B Ciantra; Matthew A Lawlor; Derin B Keskin; Namrata D Udeshi; William G Wierda; Kenneth J Livak; Anthony G Letai; Donna Neuberg; J Wade Harper; Steven A Carr; Federica Piccioni; Christopher J Ott; Ignaty Leshchiner; Cory M Johannessen; John Doench; Vamsi K Mootha; Gad Getz; Catherine J Wu Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Yingwei Hu; Jianbo Pan; Punit Shah; Minghui Ao; Stefani N Thomas; Yang Liu; Lijun Chen; Michael Schnaubelt; David J Clark; Henry Rodriguez; Emily S Boja; Tara Hiltke; Christopher R Kinsinger; Karin D Rodland; Qing Kay Li; Jiang Qian; Zhen Zhang; Daniel W Chan; Hui Zhang Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 9.423