N Abogazalah1,2, G J Eckert3, Masatoshi Ando4. 1. Department of Cariology, Operative Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Indiana University School of Dentistry, 415 Lansing Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. 2. Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, King Khalid University College of Dentistry, Abha, Saudi Arabia. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 4. Department of Cariology, Operative Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Indiana University School of Dentistry, 415 Lansing Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. mando@iu.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate a visible-light-transillumination (using Digital Imaging Fiber-Optic Transillumination machine: DIFOTI) method using occlusal view (DIFOTI-occl), axial view (buccal and lingual: DIFOTI-axial), and combination of all views (DIFOTI-all) for detecting non-cavitated approximal caries and to compare its performance to visual examination (International Caries Detection and Assessment System: ICDAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty extracted human premolars were selected (sound to lesions into the outer one-third of the dentine) based on micro-computed tomography (μ-CT). Teeth were mounted in a custom-made device to simulate approximal contact. DIFOTI (Electro-Optical Sciences Inc., Irvington, NY, USA) images were obtained from the occlusal, buccal, and lingual views. DIFOTI image and ICDAS examinations were performed and repeated by three trained/calibrated examiners. Sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver operating characteristics curve (Az), inter- and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), and correlation were determined. RESULTS: Sensitivity/specificity was for DIFOTI-occl: 0.42/0.75, DIFOTI-axial: 0.86/0.93, DIFOTI-all: 0.91/0.69, and for ICDAS: 0.89/0.83. Az for DIFOTI-occl was significantly lower than that of DIFOTI-axial (p < 0.001), DIFOTI-all (p = 0.002), and ICDAS (p = 0.005). Spearman correlation coefficients with μ-CT for DIFOTI-occl (r = 0.39) showed weak association, while DIFOTI-axial (r = 0.80), DIFOTI-all (r = 0.91), and ICDAS (r = 0.90) showed moderate association. ICCs for intra-examiner repeatability/inter-examiner agreement were for DIFOTI-occl (0.64/0.58), DIFOTI-axial (0.92/0.89), DIFOTI-all (0.85/0.83), and ICDAS (0.79/0.72). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current in vitro study suggest that, for detection of non-cavitated approximal caries lesions, DIFOTI performs better using axial than occlusal view. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Approximal non-cavitated caries detection is challenging. DIFOTI can observe images from occlusal-, buccal-, and lingual views. DIFOTI and visual (ICDAS) examinations of buccal- and lingual- and all-views are more suitable than those of occlusal view for a detection of non-cavitated approximal caries.
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate a visible-light-transillumination (using Digital Imaging Fiber-Optic Transillumination machine: DIFOTI) method using occlusal view (DIFOTI-occl), axial view (buccal and lingual: DIFOTI-axial), and combination of all views (DIFOTI-all) for detecting non-cavitated approximal caries and to compare its performance to visual examination (International Caries Detection and Assessment System: ICDAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty extracted human premolars were selected (sound to lesions into the outer one-third of the dentine) based on micro-computed tomography (μ-CT). Teeth were mounted in a custom-made device to simulate approximal contact. DIFOTI (Electro-Optical Sciences Inc., Irvington, NY, USA) images were obtained from the occlusal, buccal, and lingual views. DIFOTI image and ICDAS examinations were performed and repeated by three trained/calibrated examiners. Sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver operating characteristics curve (Az), inter- and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), and correlation were determined. RESULTS: Sensitivity/specificity was for DIFOTI-occl: 0.42/0.75, DIFOTI-axial: 0.86/0.93, DIFOTI-all: 0.91/0.69, and for ICDAS: 0.89/0.83. Az for DIFOTI-occl was significantly lower than that of DIFOTI-axial (p < 0.001), DIFOTI-all (p = 0.002), and ICDAS (p = 0.005). Spearman correlation coefficients with μ-CT for DIFOTI-occl (r = 0.39) showed weak association, while DIFOTI-axial (r = 0.80), DIFOTI-all (r = 0.91), and ICDAS (r = 0.90) showed moderate association. ICCs for intra-examiner repeatability/inter-examiner agreement were for DIFOTI-occl (0.64/0.58), DIFOTI-axial (0.92/0.89), DIFOTI-all (0.85/0.83), and ICDAS (0.79/0.72). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current in vitro study suggest that, for detection of non-cavitated approximal caries lesions, DIFOTI performs better using axial than occlusal view. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Approximal non-cavitated caries detection is challenging. DIFOTI can observe images from occlusal-, buccal-, and lingual views. DIFOTI and visual (ICDAS) examinations of buccal- and lingual- and all-views are more suitable than those of occlusal view for a detection of non-cavitated approximal caries.
Entities:
Keywords:
Approximal caries; Caries detection; DIFOTI; Digital imaging transillumination; Imaging geometry; International caries detection and assessment system (ICDAS); Non-cavitated caries lesion; Visible light transillumination
Authors: Ana Marmaneu-Menero; José Enrique Iranzo-Cortés; Teresa Almerich-Torres; José Carmelo Ortolá-Síscar; José María Montiel-Company; José Manuel Almerich-Silla Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Mila Janjic Rankovic; Svetlana Kapor; Yegane Khazaei; Alexander Crispin; Ina Schüler; Felix Krause; Kim Ekstrand; Stavroula Michou; Florin Eggmann; Adrian Lussi; Marie-Charlotte Huysmans; Klaus Neuhaus; Jan Kühnisch Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2021-09-04 Impact factor: 3.573