Jun Zhang1, Xiaoli Liu1, Michelle I Knopp1, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy2, Michael V Knopp3. 1. Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Avenue, Room 430, Columbus, OH, 43210-1228, USA. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. 3. Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Avenue, Room 430, Columbus, OH, 43210-1228, USA. knopp.16@osu.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To quantitatively evaluate the minimally required scanning time of 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine ([18F]FLT) positron emission tomography (PET) dynamic acquisition for accurate kinetic assessment of the proliferation in breast cancer tumors. PROCEDURES: Within a therapeutic intervention trial, 26 breast tumors of 8 breast cancer patients were analyzed from 30-min dynamic [18F]FLT-PET acquisitions. PET/CT was acquired on a Gemini TF 64 system (Philips Healthcare) and reconstructed into 26 frames (8 × 15 s, 6 × 30 s, 5 × 1 min, 5 × 2 min, and 2 × 5 min). Maximum activity concentrations (Bq/ml) of volume of interests over tumors and plasma in descending aorta were obtained over time frames. Kinetic parameters were estimated using in-house developed software with the two-tissue three-compartment irreversible model (2TCM) (K1, k2, k3, and Ki; k4 = 0) and Patlak model (Ki) based on different acquisition durations (Td) (10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 25, and 30 min, separately). Different linear regression onset time (T0) points (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min) were applied in Patlak analysis. Ki of the 30-min data set was taken as the gold standard for comparison. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (R) of 0.9 was chosen as a limit for the correlation. RESULTS: The correlation of kinetic parameters between the gold standard and the abbreviated dynamic data series increased with longer Td from 10 to 30 min. k2 and k3 using 2TCM and Ki using Patlak model revealed poor correlations for dynamic PET with Td ≤ 14 min (k2: R = 0.84, 0.85, 0.86; k3: R = 0.67, 0.67, 0.67; Ki: R = 0.72, 0.78, 0.87 at Td = 10, 12, and 14 min, respectively). Excellent correlations were shown for all kinetic parameters when Td ≥ 16 min regardless of the kinetic model and T0 value (R > 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that a 16-min dynamic PET acquisition appears to be sufficient to provide accurate [18F]FLT kinetics to quantitatively assess the proliferation in breast cancer lesions.
PURPOSE: To quantitatively evaluate the minimally required scanning time of 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine ([18F]FLT) positron emission tomography (PET) dynamic acquisition for accurate kinetic assessment of the proliferation in breast cancer tumors. PROCEDURES: Within a therapeutic intervention trial, 26 breast tumors of 8 breast cancerpatients were analyzed from 30-min dynamic [18F]FLT-PET acquisitions. PET/CT was acquired on a Gemini TF 64 system (Philips Healthcare) and reconstructed into 26 frames (8 × 15 s, 6 × 30 s, 5 × 1 min, 5 × 2 min, and 2 × 5 min). Maximum activity concentrations (Bq/ml) of volume of interests over tumors and plasma in descending aorta were obtained over time frames. Kinetic parameters were estimated using in-house developed software with the two-tissue three-compartment irreversible model (2TCM) (K1, k2, k3, and Ki; k4 = 0) and Patlak model (Ki) based on different acquisition durations (Td) (10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 25, and 30 min, separately). Different linear regression onset time (T0) points (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min) were applied in Patlak analysis. Ki of the 30-min data set was taken as the gold standard for comparison. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (R) of 0.9 was chosen as a limit for the correlation. RESULTS: The correlation of kinetic parameters between the gold standard and the abbreviated dynamic data series increased with longer Td from 10 to 30 min. k2 and k3 using 2TCM and Ki using Patlak model revealed poor correlations for dynamic PET with Td ≤ 14 min (k2: R = 0.84, 0.85, 0.86; k3: R = 0.67, 0.67, 0.67; Ki: R = 0.72, 0.78, 0.87 at Td = 10, 12, and 14 min, respectively). Excellent correlations were shown for all kinetic parameters when Td ≥ 16 min regardless of the kinetic model and T0 value (R > 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that a 16-min dynamic PET acquisition appears to be sufficient to provide accurate [18F]FLT kinetics to quantitatively assess the proliferation in breast cancer lesions.
Authors: Anthony F Shields; David A Briston; Samatha Chandupatla; Kirk A Douglas; Jawana Lawhorn-Crews; Jerry M Collins; Thomas J Mangner; Lance K Heilbrun; Otto Muzik Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-07-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: David A Mankoff; Lisa K Dunnwald; Julie R Gralow; Georgiana K Ellis; Aaron Charlop; Thomas J Lawton; Erin K Schubert; Jeffrey Tseng; Robert B Livingston Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Nanda C Krak; Jacobus J M van der Hoeven; Otto S Hoekstra; Jos W R Twisk; Elsken van der Wall; Adriaan A Lammertsma Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: T H Oude Munnink; W B Nagengast; A H Brouwers; C P Schröder; G A Hospers; M N Lub-de Hooge; E van der Wall; P J van Diest; E G E de Vries Journal: Breast Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Gerbrand Maria Kramer; Virginie Frings; Dennis Heijtel; E F Smit; Otto S Hoekstra; Ronald Boellaard Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Alan Desilva; Melinda Wuest; Monica Wang; Jeff Hummel; Karen Mossman; Frank Wuest; Mary M Hitt Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-12-15