Literature DB >> 18814983

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and breast cancer in clinical practice.

Robert Lavayssière1, Anne-Elizabeth Cabée, Jean-Emmanuel Filmont.   

Abstract

The landscape of oncologic practice has changed deeply during the past few years and there is now a need, through a multidisciplinary approach, for imaging to provide accurate evaluation of morphology and function and to guide treatment (Image Guided Therapy). Increasing emphasis has been put on Position Emission Tomography (PET) role in various cancers among clinicians [Juweid ME, Cheson BD. Positron-emission tomography and assessment of cancer therapy. N Engl J Med 2006;354:496-507; Koh DM, Cook GJR, Husband JE. New horizons in oncologic imaging. N Engl J Med 2003;348:25; Tafra L, positron emission tomography (PET) and mammography (PEM) for breast cancer: importance to surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;14(1):3-13] and patients despite a general context of healthcare expenditure limitation. Positron Emission Tomography has currently a limited role in breast cancer, but also general radiologists and specialists should be aware of these indications, especially when staging aggressive cancers and looking for recurrence. Currently, the hybrid systems associating PET and Computed Tomography (CT) and in the same device [Rohren EM, Turkington TG, Coleman RE. Clinical applications of PET in oncology. Radiology 2004;231:305-32; Blodgett TM, Meltzer CM, Townsend DW. PET/CT: form and function. Radiology 2007;242:360-85; von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC, Hany TF. Integrated PET/CT: current applications and futures directions. Radiology 2006;238(2):405-22], or PET-CT, are more commonly used and the two techniques are adding their potentialities. Other techniques, MRI in particular, may also compete with PET in some instance and as far as ionizing radiations dose limitation is considered, some breast cancers becoming some form of a chronic disease. Breast cancer is a very complex, non-uniform, disease and molecular imaging at large may contribute to a better knowledge and to new drugs development. Ongoing research, Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) and new tracers, are likely to bring improvements in patient care [Kelloff GJ, Hoffman JM, Johnson B, et al. Progress and promise of FDG-PET Imaging for cancer patient management and oncologic drug development. Clin Cancer Res 2005;1(April (8)): 2005].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18814983     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  11 in total

1.  Semiquantitative analysis of maximum standardized uptake values of regional lymph nodes in inflammatory breast cancer: is there a reliable threshold for differentiating benign from malignant?

Authors:  Selin Carkaci; Beatriz E Adrada; Eric Rohren; Wei Wei; Mohammad A Quraishi; Osama Mawlawi; Thomas A Buchholz; Wei Yang
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Transketolase is upregulated in metastatic peritoneal implants and promotes ovarian cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Carmela Ricciardelli; Noor A Lokman; Sowmya Cheruvu; Izza A Tan; Miranda P Ween; Carmen E Pyragius; Andrew Ruszkiewicz; Peter Hoffmann; Martin K Oehler
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  How Long of a Dynamic 3'-Deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine ([18F]FLT) PET Acquisition Is Needed for Robust Kinetic Analysis in Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Xiaoli Liu; Michelle I Knopp; Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  Multimodality Imaging of the Reconstructed Breast.

Authors:  Beatriz E Adrada; Gary J Whitman; Melissa A Crosby; Selin Carkaci; Mark J Dryden; Basak E Dogan
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2015-04-27

Review 5.  Use of Diagnostic Imaging Modalities in Modern Screening, Diagnostics and Management of Breast Tumours 1st Central-Eastern European Professional Consensus Statement on Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gábor Forrai; Eszter Kovács; Éva Ambrózay; Miklós Barta; Katalin Borbély; Zsolt Lengyel; Katalin Ormándi; Zoltán Péntek; Tasnádi Tünde; Éva Sebő
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.874

6.  Molecular image-directed biopsies: improving clinical biopsy selection in patients with multiple tumors.

Authors:  Stephanie A Harmon; Michael J Tuite; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Prognostic Value of Primary Tumor Uptake on F-18 FDG PET/CT in Patients with Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Bong-Il Song; Chae Moon Hong; Hong Je Lee; Sungmin Kang; Shin Young Jeong; Hae Won Kim; Yee Soo Chae; Ji Young Park; Sang-Woo Lee; Byeong-Cheol Ahn; Jaetae Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-20

Review 8.  Latest biopsy approach for suspected metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Naoki Niikura; Bruno C Odisio; Yutaka Tokuda; Fraser W Symmans; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  Opportunities for PET to deliver clinical benefit in cancer: breast cancer as a paradigm.

Authors:  Ian N Fleming; Fiona J Gilbert; Ken A Miles; David Cameron
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Multiparametric evaluation of breast lesions using PET-MRI: initial results and future perspectives.

Authors:  Almir G V Bitencourt; Eduardo N P Lima; Rubens Chojniak; Elvira F Marques; Juliana A Souza; Wesley P Andrade; Marcos D Guimarães
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.