| Literature DB >> 29987198 |
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge and behavior of university athletes in Saudi Arabia regarding energy drinks (EDs) and sports drinks (SDs). In addition, the microbiological quality of available local drinks was also assessed. The presence of total bacterial coliform count, Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Staphylococcus aureus on these drinks was also determined. Of the 120 university athletes surveyed, 69 were currently using SDs, and 51 were using EDs. The study consisted of a 10-question survey assessing the athletes&rsquo; sociodemographic characteristics, personal habits, and SD- and ED-related knowledge and habits. With regard to the question about the primary reason for using EDs, n = 26 respondents (50.98%) reported that providing energy (speed, strength, and power) was the main reason for consuming these beverages. Conversely, n = 25 respondents (36.23%) believed that recovery from injury or illnesses was the main reason for the consumption of SDs. A majority of university athletes (n = 43, 62.32%) who used SDs believed that SDs were safe to use, while n = 22 respondents (43.14%) were unaware of any adverse health effects associated with the consumption of EDs. Of the total of 26 SDs and EDs tested, microbial contamination was present in only two products. Microbial levels and the total bacterial count for most of the samples were very low (<1 log CFU/mL). However, some drinks had a slightly higher microbial level, which could be harmful or cause spoilage with improper storage. Thus, our findings suggest that improvements in microbial quality are needed for these beverages.Entities:
Keywords: behavior; energy drinks; knowledge; microbial quality; safety; sports drinks; university athletes
Year: 2018 PMID: 29987198 PMCID: PMC6162758 DOI: 10.3390/sports6030060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sports (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4663
Participant demographics (n = 120).
| Characteristic | |
|---|---|
| Age | |
| 18 or younger | 11 (9.2) |
| 19 to 23 | 96 (80.0) |
| 24 or older | 13 (10.8) |
| Class standing | |
| Freshman | 11 (9.2) |
| Sophomore | 41 (34.2) |
| Junior | 26 (21.7) |
| Senior | 35 (29.2) |
| Graduate | 7 (5.8) |
| SD and ED consumption | |
| Using SDs | 69 (57.50) |
| Using EDs | 51 (42.50) |
Note: The results showed that the responses differed significantly (p < 0.0001) from the hypothesized value (0.05) indicating that the demographic data was limited to age and class standing. SD = sports drink; ED = energy drink.
Knowledge and attitudes towards safety drinks (n = 69) and energy drinks (n = 51) among college athletes.
| Responses | SDs | EDs |
|---|---|---|
| 1. What is your overall impression and attitude toward these products? | ||
| Positive | 41 (59.42) | 29 (56.86) |
| Negative | 18 (26.09) | 13 (25.49) |
| Neutral | 10 (14.49) | 9 (17.65) |
| 2. How often do you consume these products? | ||
| Every day | 32 (46.38) | 19 (37.25) |
| Once per week | 20 (28.99) | 16 (31.37) |
| Once per month | 12 (17.25) | 11 (21.57) |
| Rarely | 5 (7.25) | 5 (9.80) |
| 3. What is the main reason for consuming these products? (Most important reason) | ||
| Provide energy (speed, strength, power) | 18 (26.09) | 26 (50.98) |
| Recover from an injury or illness | 25 (36.23) | 13 (25.49) |
| Improve endurance | 8 (11.59) | 2 (3.92) |
| Enhance tolerance for additional training | 5 (7.25) | 6 (11.76) |
| Enhance ability to cope with pain | 9 (13.04) | 2 (3.92) |
| Other | 4 (5.80) | 2 (3.92) |
| 4. What are these products used for? | ||
| Elements to boost energy | 19 (27.54) | 23 (45.10) |
| As a dietary supplement | 27 (39.13) | 12 (23.53) |
| As stimulants | 1 (1.45) | 2 (3.92) |
| Do not know | 22 (31.88) | 14 (27.45) |
| 5. How do you obtain information about these products? | ||
| Coach or physician | 14 (20.29) | 4 (7.84) |
| Nutritionist or dietician | 8 (11.59) | 5 (9.80) |
| Family or friends | 19 (27.54) | 21 (41.18) |
| Online | 7 (10.14) | 4 (7.84) |
| Retail store | 16 (23.19) | 8 (15.69) |
| Others | 5 (7.25) | 9 (17.65) |
Note: The results showed that the response does differ significantly (p < 0.0001) from the hypothesized value (0.05) indicating knowledge and attitudes towards SDs and EDs differ for each individual. SD = sports drink; ED = energy drink.
Safety of sports drinks (n = 69) and energy drinks (n = 51) among college athletes.
| Response | SDs | Eds |
|---|---|---|
| 6. Are you able to identify if there are any side effects of these products? | ||
| Yes | 9 (13.04) | 17 (33.33) |
| No | 38 (55.07) | 21 (41.18) |
| Do not know | 22 (31.88) | 13 (25.49) |
| 7. Should you worry about the effects of these products’ on your immune system? | ||
| Yes | 13 (18.84) | 12 (23.53) |
| No | 41 (59.42) | 22 (43.14) |
| Do not know | 15 (21.74) | 17 (33.33) |
| 8. Do you consider these products safe to use? | ||
| Yes | 43 (62.32) | 18 (35.29) |
| No | 11 (15.94) | 11 (21.57) |
| Do not know | 15 (21.74) | 22 (43.14) |
Note: The results show that the response for the “safe to use these products” question differs significantly (p < 0.0001) from the hypothesized value (0.05) indicating that the responses differ for each study participant. SD = sports drink; ED = energy drink.
Type of sports drink and frequency of use among university athletes (n = 69).
| Brand of Sports Drink | % | |
|---|---|---|
| 9. Which of these sports drinks have you used most frequently? | ||
| Powerade | 7 | 10.14 |
| Gatorade | 34 | 49.28 |
| Vitamin water | 4 | 5.80 |
| Sobe Lifewater | 6 | 8.70 |
| Revive | 3 | 4.35 |
| All Sport | 4 | 5.80 |
| Other | 11 | 15.94 |
Note: The results show a p-value of 0.0001; thus, we can conclude that there is a statistically significant difference between the type of sports drink and frequency of use among college athletes.
Type of energy drink and frequency of use among college athletes (n = 51).
| Brand of Energy Drink | % | |
|---|---|---|
| 10. Which of these products have you used most frequently? | ||
| Red Bull | 20 | 39.22 |
| Code Red | 13 | 25.49 |
| Bison | 2 | 3.92 |
| Bugzy | 4 | 7.84 |
| Power Horse | 2 | 3.92 |
| Vault | 3 | 5.88 |
| Blu Day | 1 | 1.96 |
| Black | 2 | 3.92 |
| Boom Boom | 2 | 3.92 |
| Shark | 0 | 0.00 |
| AMP (simply Amp) | 2 | 3.92 |
| Other | 0 | 0.00 |
Note: The results show a p-value 0.0001, so we can conclude that there is a statistically significant difference between the type of energy drink and frequency of use among college athletes.
Quantity of caffeine 1, total bacterial count 2, and pH values of beverages (EDs and SDs) available in local market.
| Product Number | Caffeine (mg/L) | Total Bacterial Count (Log CFU/mL) | pH Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3500 | 1.60 | 3.85 |
| 2 | 300 | <1.0 | 4.10 |
| 3 | 280 | <1.0 | 3.00 |
| 4 | 530 | 1.20 | 86.00 |
| 5 | 300 | <1.0 | 3.90 |
| 6 | 900 | <1.0 | 4.10 |
| 7 | 320 | 1.70 | 3.54 |
| 8 | 210 | <1.0 | 4.15 |
| 9 | 450 | <1.0 | 4.23 |
| 10 | 500 | <1.0 | 3.90 |
| 11 | 120 | 2.10 | 3.79 |
| 12 | 310 | 1.30 | 3.75 |
| 13 | 500 | <1.0 | 3.80 |
| 14 | 310 | 1.75 | 4.05 |
| 15 | 400 | <1.0 | 3.76 |
| 16 | 500 | <1.0 | 3.95 |
| 17 | 160 | 2.30 | 4.20 |
| 18 | 50 | 2.5 | 4.10 |
| 19 | 10 | 2.1 | 3.87 |
| 20 | 290 | <1.0 | 2.70 |
| 21 | 0 | <1.0 | 2.70 |
| 22 | 0 | <1.0 | 4.00 |
| 23 | 0 | <1.0 | 5.60 |
| 24 | 0 | <1.0 | 3.60 |
| 25 | 0 | <1.0 | 5.40 |
| 26 | 0 | <1.0 | 3.75 |
1 For comparison, cola has 100 mg/L and coffee ~ 250 mg/L caffeine; 2 <1.0 (CFU/mL) means below detectable levels.