Literature DB >> 29986987

Impact of Medical Scribes in Primary Care on Productivity, Face-to-Face Time, and Patient Comfort.

Leah Zallman1, Karen Finnegan2, David Roll2, Martina Todaro2, Rawan Oneiz2, Assaad Sayah2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medical scribes are a clinical innovation increasingly being used in primary care. The impact of scribes in primary care remain unclear. We aimed to examine the impact of medical scribes on productivity, time spent facing the patient during the visit, and patient comfort with scribes in primary care.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational pre-post study of 5 family and internal medicine-pediatrics physicians and their patients at an urban safety net health clinic. Medical scribes accompanied providers in the examination room and documented the clinical encounter. After an initial phase-in period, we added an additional 20-minute patient slot per 200-minute session. We examined productivity by using electronic medical record data on the number of patients seen and work relative value units (work RVUs) per hour. We directly observed clinical encounters to measure the amount of time providers spent facing patients and other visit components. We queried patient comfort with scribes by using surveys administered after the visit.
RESULTS: Work RVUs per hour increased by 10.5% from 2.59 prescribe to 2.86 post-scribe (P < .001). Patients seen per hour increased by 8.8% from 1.82 to 1.98 (P < .001). Work RVUs per patient did not change. After scribe implementation, time spent facing the patient increased by 57% (P < .001) and time spent facing the computer decreased by 27% (P = .003). The proportion of the visit time that was spent face-to-face increased by 39% (P < .001). Most (69%) patients reported feeling very comfortable with the scribe in the room, while the proportion feeling very comfortable with the number of people in the room decreased from 93% to 66% (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the full implications of medical scribe implementation remain to be seen, this initial study highlights the promising opportunity of medical scribe implementation in primary care. © Copyright 2018 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic Health Records; Physician-Patient Relations; Primary Health Care; Prospective Studies

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29986987     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.04.170325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  10 in total

1.  Promoting Quality Face-to-Face Communication during Ophthalmology Encounters in the Electronic Health Record Era.

Authors:  Sally L Baxter; Helena E Gali; Michael F Chiang; Michelle R Hribar; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Robert El-Kareh; Abigail E Huang; Heather E Chen; Andrew S Camp; Don O Kikkawa; Bobby S Korn; Jeffrey E Lee; Christopher A Longhurst; Marlene Millen
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 2.  Electronic Health Record Optimization and Clinician Well-Being: A Potential Roadmap Toward Action.

Authors:  Tina Shah; Andrea Borondy Kitts; Jeffrey A Gold; Keith Horvath; Alex Ommaya; Opelka Frank; Luke Sato; Gretchen Schwarze; Mark Upton; Lew Sandy
Journal:  NAM Perspect       Date:  2020-08-03

3.  Translating ethnographic data into knowledge, skills, and attitude statements for medical scribes: a modified Delphi approach.

Authors:  Sky Corby; Joan S Ash; Keaton Whittaker; Vishnu Mohan; Nicholas Solberg; James Becton; Robby Bergstrom; Benjamin Orwoll; Christopher Hoekstra; Jeffrey A Gold
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 7.942

Review 4.  N-of-1 trials to facilitate evidence-based deprescribing: Rationale and case study.

Authors:  Parag Goyal; Monika M Safford; Sarah N Hilmer; Michael A Steinman; Daniel D Matlock; Mathew S Maurer; Mark S Lachs; Ian M Kronish
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.716

Review 5.  The Use of Medical Scribes in Primary Care Settings: A Literature Synthesis.

Authors:  Margaret Ziemann; Clese Erikson; Maddie Krips
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.178

6.  How does medical scribes' work inform development of speech-based clinical documentation technologies? A systematic review.

Authors:  Brian D Tran; Yunan Chen; Songzi Liu; Kai Zheng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Design and implementation of a cluster randomized trial measuring benefits of medical scribes in the VA.

Authors:  Paul R Shafer; Melissa M Garrido; Elsa Pearson; Sivagaminathan Palani; Alex Woodruff; Amanda M Lyn; Katherine M Williams; Susan R Kirsh; Steven D Pizer
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.261

8.  Association of healthy lifestyle and all-cause mortality according to medication burden.

Authors:  Neil A Kelly; Orysya Soroka; Chukwuma Onyebeke; Laura C Pinheiro; Samprit Banerjee; Monika M Safford; Parag Goyal
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 7.538

9.  Impact of a medical scribe on clinical efficiency and quality in an academic general internal medicine practice.

Authors:  Anastasia Pozdnyakova Piersa; Neda Laiteerapong; Sandra A Ham; Felipe Fernandez Del Castillo; Sachin Shah; Deborah L Burnet; Wei Wei Lee
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-11       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Safe use of the EHR by medical scribes: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Joan S Ash; Sky Corby; Vishnu Mohan; Nicholas Solberg; James Becton; Robby Bergstrom; Benjamin Orwoll; Christopher Hoekstra; Jeffrey A Gold
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.497

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.