Literature DB >> 29985042

Voluntary switching in an invertebrate: The effect of cue and reward change.

Tomer J Czaczkes1, Alexandra Koch1, Kerstin Fröber2, Gesine Dreisbach2.   

Abstract

When faced with multiple competing goals, individuals must decide which goal to attend to. Voluntary task switching is an important paradigm for testing cognitive flexibility and spontaneous decision-making when competing tasks are present. Of particular importance is the study of how reward affects task switching, as reward is perhaps the most commonly used tool for shaping both human and animal behavior. Recently, Fröber and Dreisbach (2016) demonstrated that it is not reward level per se, but reward change, which most strongly affects switching behavior in humans: Task switching was lowest when reward remained high and highest when reward is changed (increase or decrease), while the repetition of low reward showed intermediate switching levels. Here we replicate their experiment on individual foragers of the ant species Lasius niger. Using an adapted spontaneous alternation task, we find that ants' switching response in light of their immediate reward history is qualitatively identical to that of humans. In a second experiment, we show that some of this behavior can be explained by the cue change, rather than the rewards. However, patterns exist in the data which cue change cannot explain. The striking parallel in behavior between humans and insects raises questions about how reward shapes behavioral flexibility and stability in humans. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29985042     DOI: 10.1037/xan0000171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn        ISSN: 2329-8456            Impact factor:   2.478


  3 in total

1.  Negative feedback: ants choose unoccupied over occupied food sources and lay more pheromone to them.

Authors:  Stephanie Wendt; Nico Kleinhoelting; Tomer J Czaczkes
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Positive and negative incentive contrasts lead to relative value perception in ants.

Authors:  Stephanie Wendt; Kim S Strunk; Jürgen Heinze; Andreas Roider; Tomer J Czaczkes
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Irrational risk aversion in an ant.

Authors:  Massimo De Agrò; Daniel Grimwade; Richard Bach; Tomer J Czaczkes
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.084

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.