Literature DB >> 29984074

Quantitative diagnosis of tissue microstructure with wide-field high spatial frequency domain imaging.

Weihao Lin1, Bixin Zeng1, Zili Cao1, Xinlin Chen1, Kaiyan Yang2, Min Xu1,3.   

Abstract

Non-contact and minimally invasive endoscopic optical imaging is an invaluable diagnostic tool for tissue examination and cancer screening. The point sampling techniques with high sensitivity to the tissue microenvironment are time consuming and often not affordable in clinics. There is a major clinical need for a large field-of-view (FOV) rapid screening method to highlight subtle tissue microstructural alterations. To address this unmet need, we have developed High Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging (HSFDI)-a non-contact imaging modality that spatially maps the tissue microscopic scattering structures over a large field of view (>1cm2). Based on an analytical reflectance model of sub-diffusive light from forward-peaked highly scattering media, HSFDI quantifies the spatially-resolved parameters of the light scattering phase function (i.e., the backscattering probability and the light spreading length) from the reflectance of structured light modulated at high spatial frequencies. Enhanced signal to noise ratio (SNR) is achieved at even ultra-high modulation frequencies with single snapshot multiple frequency demodulation (SSMD). The variations in tissue microstructures, including the strength of the background (pudding) refractive index fluctuation and the prominent scattering structure (plum) morphology, can then be inferred. After validation with optical phantoms, measurements of fresh ex vivo tissue samples revealed significant contrast and differentiation of the phase function parameters between different types and disease states (normal, inflammatory, and cancerous) of tissue whereas tissue absorption and reduced scattering coefficients only show modest changes. HSFDI may provide wide-field images of microscopic structural biomarkers unobtainable with either diffuse light imaging or point-based optical sampling. Potential clinical applications include the rapid screening of excised tissue and the noninvasive examination of suspicious lesions during operation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (170.3660) Light propagation in tissues; (170.3880) Medical and biological imaging; (170.6935) Tissue characterization

Year:  2018        PMID: 29984074      PMCID: PMC6033573          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.9.002905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  23 in total

Review 1.  Detection and treatment of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: a pivotal challenge in translating biophotonics from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Brian C Wilson
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Optical scattering properties of soft tissue: a discrete particle model.

Authors:  J M Schmitt; G Kumar
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 1.980

Review 3.  Optical method.

Authors:  B Chance
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem       Date:  1991

4.  Unified Mie and fractal scattering by cells and experimental study on application in optical characterization of cellular and subcellular structures.

Authors:  Min Xu; Tao T Wu; Jianan Y Qu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Influence of the scattering phase function on light transport measurements in turbid media performed with small source-detector separations.

Authors:  J R Mourant; J Boyer; A H Hielscher; I J Bigio
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 3.776

6.  Sub-diffusive scattering parameter maps recovered using wide-field high-frequency structured light imaging.

Authors:  Stephen Chad Kanick; David M McClatchy; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Jonathan T Elliott; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Plum pudding random medium model of biological tissue toward remote microscopy from spectroscopic light scattering.

Authors:  Min Xu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 8.  Influence of the phase function in generalized diffuse reflectance models: review of current formalisms and novel observations.

Authors:  Katherine W Calabro; Irving J Bigio
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Single snapshot imaging of optical properties.

Authors:  Jean Vervandier; Sylvain Gioux
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  In vivo real-time imaging of cutaneous hemoglobin concentration, oxygen saturation, scattering properties, melanin content, and epidermal thickness with visible spatially modulated light.

Authors:  Xinlin Chen; Weihao Lin; Chenge Wang; Shaoheng Chen; Jing Sheng; Bixin Zeng; M Xu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  2 in total

1.  Active line scan with spatial gating for sub-diffuse reflectance imaging of scatter microtexture.

Authors:  Samuel S Streeter; Benjamin W Maloney; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.560

2.  Spatial frequency domain imaging in 2019: principles, applications, and perspectives.

Authors:  Sylvain Gioux; Amaan Mazhar; David J Cuccia
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.170

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.