Literature DB >> 29983259

Impact of radiotherapy underutilisation measured by survival shortfall, years of potential life lost and disability-adjusted life years lost in New South Wales, Australia.

Vikneswary Batumalai1, Jesmin Shafiq2, Gabriel Gabriel2, Timothy P Hanna3, Geoff P Delaney4, Michael Barton4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Despite evidence of the benefits of radiotherapy (RT) in the treatment of cancer patients, its underutilisation has been reported for various tumour sites. The aim of this study was to estimate survival shortfall, 'years of potential life lost' (YPLL) and 'disability-adjusted life years lost' (DALY) to demonstrate the impact of radiotherapy underutilisation in Australia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Optimal and actual RT utilisation (RTU) was compared to assess RT underutilisation to estimate 5-year overall survival shortfall using 2006 data from New South Wales (NSW) for 26 common tumour sites. 5-year overall survival shortfall is defined as number of people not surviving for 5-years due to RT underutilisation [=benefit proportion × shortfall [(optimal-actual RTU)/optimal RTU] proportion × No. of new cases]. YPLL = survival shortfall × estimated years of life lost per person (overall life expectancy - median age at death for specific cancer). DALY = (Years lived with disability + Years of life lost) × survival shortfall.
RESULTS: The total number of new cases with cancer in 2006 in NSW was 20,741. Optimal RTU was 48% while actual RTU was 26%, resulting in estimated of 411 deaths due to underutilisation. Each death resulted in an average of 10.4 YPLL and 17.5 DALY. It was estimated RT underutilisation resulted in a total of 4,289 YPLL and 7,192 DALY overall.
CONCLUSION: This study illustrates the value of considering different mortality statistics, which include measures of the burden of cancer deaths on both the population and patients. Crown
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disability-adjusted life years; Radiotherapy; Survival shortfall; Utilisation; Years of potential life lost

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29983259     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.06.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  7 in total

Review 1.  What is the optimal radiotherapy utilization rate for lung cancer?-a systematic review.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Alissa Liu; Jessica Chan; R Gabriel Boldt; Pablo Munoz-Schuffenegger; Alexander V Louie
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09

2.  What is multidisciplinary cancer care like in practice? a protocol for a mixed-method study to characterise ambulatory oncology services in the Australian public sector.

Authors:  Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig; Gaston Arnolda; Yvonne Tran; Mia Bierbaum; Klay Lamprell; Geoffrey P Delaney; Winston Liauw; Renuka Chittajallu; Teresa Winata; Robyn L Ward; David C Currow; Ian Olver; Jonathan Karnon; Johanna Westbrook; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Factors affecting radiotherapy utilisation in geriatric oncology patients in NSW, Australia.

Authors:  Penny Mackenzie; Claire Vajdic; Geoff Delaney; Gabriel Gabriel; Meera Agar; Tracy Comans; Michael Barton
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-13

4.  Optimal and actual rates of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) utilisation for primary lung cancer in Australia.

Authors:  Wsam Ghandourh; Lois Holloway; Vikneswary Batumalai; Phillip Chlap; Matthew Field; Susannah Jacob
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03-05

5.  Disparities in radiation therapy utilization for cancer patients in Victoria.

Authors:  Wee Loon Ong; Norah Finn; Luc Te Marvelde; Colin Hornby; Roger L Milne; Gerard G Hanna; Graham Pitson; Hany Elsaleh; Jeremy L Millar; Farshad Foroudi
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 1.667

6.  Clinicians' attitudes and perceived barriers and facilitators to cancer treatment clinical practice guideline adherence: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative literature.

Authors:  Mia Bierbaum; Frances Rapport; Gaston Arnolda; Brona Nic Giolla Easpaig; Klay Lamprell; Karen Hutchinson; Geoff P Delaney; Winston Liauw; Richard Kefford; Ian Olver; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 7.  Empowering patients in decision-making in radiation oncology - can we do better?

Authors:  Michelle Leech; Matthew S Katz; Joanna Kazmierska; Julie McCrossin; Sandra Turner
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 6.603

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.