Literature DB >> 29983147

Myocardial Viability Testing to Guide Coronary Revascularization.

Adrián I Löffler1, Christopher M Kramer2.   

Abstract

Left ventricular dysfunction remains one of the best prognostic determinants of survival in patients with coronary artery disease. Revascularization has been shown to improve survival compared with medical therapy alone. Viability testing can help direct patients who will benefit the most from revascularization. Single-photon emission computed tomography, dobutamine stress echo, cardiac MRI, and PET imaging with F18-fluorodeoxyglucose are the most common modalities for assessing myocardial viability. Viability testing can help differentiate which patients benefit most from chronic total occlusion interventions.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic total occlusion; Hibernation; Revascularization; Viability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29983147      PMCID: PMC6044453          DOI: 10.1016/j.iccl.2018.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Cardiol Clin        ISSN: 2211-7458


  47 in total

1.  Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracies of various noninvasive techniques for detecting hibernating myocardium.

Authors:  J J Bax; D Poldermans; A Elhendy; E Boersma; S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.200

2.  Extensive left ventricular remodeling does not allow viable myocardium to improve in left ventricular ejection fraction after revascularization and is associated with worse long-term prognosis.

Authors:  Jeroen J Bax; Arend F L Schinkel; Eric Boersma; Abdou Elhendy; Vittoria Rizzello; Alexander Maat; Jos R T C Roelandt; Ernst E van der Wall; Don Poldermans
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-09-14       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Is viability imaging still relevant in 2012?

Authors:  Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Bernard J Gersh; Julio A Panza
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05

Review 4.  Predicting benefit from revascularization in patients with ischemic heart failure: imaging of myocardial ischemia and viability.

Authors:  Orla Buckley; Marcelo Di Carli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  The viable myocardium: epidemiology, detection, and clinical implications.

Authors:  T H Marwick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-03-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging-assisted management of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and suspected coronary disease: a randomized, controlled trial (PARR-2).

Authors:  Rob S B Beanlands; Graham Nichol; Ella Huszti; Dennis Humen; Normand Racine; Michael Freeman; Karen Y Gulenchyn; Linda Garrard; Robert deKemp; Ann Guo; Terrence D Ruddy; Francois Benard; André Lamy; Robert M Iwanochko
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Stress-induced reversible and mild-to-moderate irreversible thallium defects: are they equally accurate for predicting recovery of regional left ventricular function after revascularization?

Authors:  A N Kitsiou; G Srinivasan; A A Quyyumi; R M Summers; S L Bacharach; V Dilsizian
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-08-11       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: retrospective study of a renal replacement therapy cohort.

Authors:  Tara Anne Collidge; Peter Campbell Thomson; Patrick Barry Mark; James Phillip Traynor; Alan George Jardine; Scott Thomas William Morris; Keith Simpson; Giles Hannibal Roditi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Eric J Velazquez; Kerry L Lee; Robert H Jones; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; James A Hill; Julio A Panza; Robert E Michler; Robert O Bonow; Torsten Doenst; Mark C Petrie; Jae K Oh; Lilin She; Vanessa L Moore; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; George Sopko; Jean L Rouleau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Myocardial Viability: From Proof of Concept to Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Aditya Bhat; Gary C H Gan; Timothy C Tan; Chijen Hsu; Alan Robert Denniss
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2016-05-29       Impact factor: 1.866

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Multimodality Imaging of Myocardial Viability.

Authors:  Kinjan Parikh; Alana Choy-Shan; Munir Ghesani; Robert Donnino
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Can the degree of coronary collateralization be used in clinical routine as a valid angiographic parameter of viability?

Authors:  Maja Pirnat; Arthur E Stillman; Rainer Rienmueller; Marko Noc; Mario Gorenjak; Tomaž Šeruga
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  The duration of early systolic lengthening may predict ischemia from scar tissue in patients with chronic coronary total occlusion lesions.

Authors:  Muzaffer Kahyaoglu; Cetin Gecmen; Ozkan Candan; Ibrahim Akin İzgi; Cevat Kirma
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Validity of resting strain/strain rate in prediction of myocardial viability.

Authors:  Amr Hanafy; Soliman Ghareb Ibrahim; Hossam-Eldein Mohamed Mohamed Mansour; Aml Mohamed Soliman; Mohamed Kamal Salama
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Evaluating the role of left ventricle global longitudinal strain in myocardial perfusion defect assessment.

Authors:  Michal Laufer-Perl; Joshua H Arnold; Yonatan Moshkovits; Ofer Havakuk; Haim Shmilovich; Genady Chausovsky; Ayelet Sivan; Yishay Szekely; Yaron Arbel; Shmuel Banai; Yan Topilsky; Zach Rozenbaum
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 2.357

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.