Literature DB >> 22595164

Is viability imaging still relevant in 2012?

Panithaya Chareonthaitawee1, Bernard J Gersh, Julio A Panza.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22595164     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Myocardial Viability and Revascularization: Current Understanding and Future Directions.

Authors:  Pavan Patel; Alexander Ivanov; Kumudha Ramasubbu
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Myocardial Viability Testing to Guide Coronary Revascularization.

Authors:  Adrián I Löffler; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  Interv Cardiol Clin       Date:  2018-06-29

Review 3.  The benefits of revascularization in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Sothinathan Gurunathan; Asrar Ahmed; Roxy Senior
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-04

Review 4.  Noninvasive assessment myocardial viability: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Kevin C Allman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Severity of Remodeling, Myocardial Viability, and Survival in Ischemic LV Dysfunction After Surgical Revascularization.

Authors:  Robert O Bonow; Serenella Castelvecchio; Julio A Panza; Daniel S Berman; Eric J Velazquez; Robert E Michler; Lilin She; Thomas A Holly; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; Dragana Kosevic; Miroslaw Rajda; Lukasz Chrzanowski; Marek Deja; Kerry L Lee; Harvey White; Jae K Oh; Torsten Doenst; James A Hill; Jean L Rouleau; Lorenzo Menicanti
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.