Ziyad Ben Taleb1, Alison Breland2, Raed Bahelah1, Mohammad Ebrahimi Kalan1, Mayra Vargas-Rivera1, Rana Jaber3, Thomas Eissenberg2, Wasim Maziak1,4. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL. 2. Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA. 3. Center for Healthcare Advancement and Outcomes, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL. 4. Syrian Center for Tobacco Studies, Aleppo, Syria.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Flavored waterpipe (WP) tobacco is the main type of tobacco used by young WP smokers, and a major factor attracting youth to smoke. However, evidence regarding the effect of limiting flavor on WP smokers' experience continues to be lacking. This study aims at evaluating the effect of flavor restriction on WP smokers' toxicant exposure, smoking topography, subjective experiences and harm perception. METHODS: Thirty-two WP smokers completed two, 45-minute ad libitum smoking sessions (preferred flavor vs non-flavored tobacco) in a crossover design pilot study. Plasma nicotine concentration and exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) were measured before and after each smoking session. Puff topography was recorded throughout the smoking session. Participants completed survey questionnaires assessing subjective smoking experiences and harm perception. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in plasma nicotine concentration between the two WP tobacco conditions, with a higher increase in plasma nicotine concentration following the flavored tobacco session. There were no significant differences between the two WP tobacco conditions for eCO and smoking topography measures. Compared with the non-flavored WP tobacco, we documented enhanced subjective smoking measures of satisfaction, calmness, taste, puff liking and enjoyment following the preferred flavored WP tobacco session. Cigarette harm perception was significantly higher among participants after smoking their preferred flavor compared with non-flavored WP tobacco. CONCLUSIONS: Limiting tobacco flavor has a substantial effect on WP smokers' nicotine exposure, subjective experience and harm perception. Therefore, eliminating or restricting WP flavors could be an essential element of comprehensive tobacco control policies to reduce the appeal of WP tobacco products for youth. IMPLICATIONS: This study highlights the important role of flavor in shaping WP smokers' experiences and exposures and the potential impact that regulating flavored WP tobacco may have on curbing WP use among youth in the US. Such regulations may reduce the appeal and the interest in WP smoking initiation and continued use.
INTRODUCTION: Flavored waterpipe (WP) tobacco is the main type of tobacco used by young WP smokers, and a major factor attracting youth to smoke. However, evidence regarding the effect of limiting flavor on WP smokers' experience continues to be lacking. This study aims at evaluating the effect of flavor restriction on WP smokers' toxicant exposure, smoking topography, subjective experiences and harm perception. METHODS: Thirty-two WP smokers completed two, 45-minute ad libitum smoking sessions (preferred flavor vs non-flavored tobacco) in a crossover design pilot study. Plasma nicotine concentration and exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) were measured before and after each smoking session. Puff topography was recorded throughout the smoking session. Participants completed survey questionnaires assessing subjective smoking experiences and harm perception. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in plasma nicotine concentration between the two WP tobacco conditions, with a higher increase in plasma nicotine concentration following the flavored tobacco session. There were no significant differences between the two WP tobacco conditions for eCO and smoking topography measures. Compared with the non-flavored WP tobacco, we documented enhanced subjective smoking measures of satisfaction, calmness, taste, puff liking and enjoyment following the preferred flavored WP tobacco session. Cigarette harm perception was significantly higher among participants after smoking their preferred flavor compared with non-flavored WP tobacco. CONCLUSIONS: Limiting tobacco flavor has a substantial effect on WP smokers' nicotine exposure, subjective experience and harm perception. Therefore, eliminating or restricting WP flavors could be an essential element of comprehensive tobacco control policies to reduce the appeal of WP tobacco products for youth. IMPLICATIONS: This study highlights the important role of flavor in shaping WP smokers' experiences and exposures and the potential impact that regulating flavored WP tobacco may have on curbing WP use among youth in the US. Such regulations may reduce the appeal and the interest in WP smoking initiation and continued use.
Authors: Farahnaz Islam; Ramzi G Salloum; Rima Nakkash; Wasim Maziak; James F Thrasher Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2016-03-14 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Brant W Riedel; Jonathan L Blitstein; Leslie A Robinson; David M Murray; Robert C Klesges Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Ramzi G Salloum; Wasim Maziak; David Hammond; Rima Nakkash; Farahnaz Islam; Xi Cheng; James F Thrasher Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Ahmed Jamal; Andrea Gentzke; S Sean Hu; Karen A Cullen; Benjamin J Apelberg; David M Homa; Brian A King Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Ziyad Ben Taleb; Mayra Vargas; Mohammad Ebrahimi Kalan; Alison Breland; Thomas Eissenberg; David Brown; Wasim Maziak Journal: Tob Control Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Liane M Schneller; Dongmei Li; Zahíra Quiñones Tavárez; Maciej L Goniewicz; Amanda J Quisenberry; Zidian Xie; Irfan Rahman; Scott McIntosh; Richard J O'Connor; Deborah J Ossip Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2020-09-01
Authors: Erin L Sutfin; Karma McKelvey; Eric Soule; Allison Glasser; Hyoshin Kim; Kimberly D Wiseman; Rachel Grana Journal: Tob Control Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 6.953
Authors: Stephanie Klosterhalfen; Daniel Kotz; Benjamin Kuntz; Johannes Zeiher; Anne Starker Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-22 Impact factor: 3.390