Literature DB >> 29981964

Mental states modulate gaze following, but not automatically.

Gustav Kuhn1, Ieva Vacaityte2, Antonia D C D'Souza3, Abbie C Millett3, Geoff G Cole4.   

Abstract

A number of authors have suggested that the computation of another person's visual perspective occurs automatically. In the current work we examined whether perspective-taking is indeed automatic or more likely to be due to mechanisms associated with conscious control. Participants viewed everyday scenes in which a single human model looked towards a target object. Importantly, the model's view of the object was either visible or occluded by a physical barrier (e.g., briefcase). Results showed that when observers were given five seconds to freely view the scenes, eye movements were faster to fixate the object when the model could see it compared to when it was occluded. By contrast, when observers were required to rapidly discriminate a target superimposed upon the same object no such visibility effect occurred. We also employed the barrier procedure together with the most recent method (i.e., the ambiguous number paradigm) to have been employed in assessing the perspective-taking theory. Results showed that the model's gaze facilitated responses even when this agent could not see the critical stimuli. We argue that although humans do take into account the perspective of other people this does not occur automatically.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automaticity; Eye movements; Gaze following; Mental states; Social attention

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29981964     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  4 in total

1.  Rapid detection of social interactions is the result of domain general attentional processes.

Authors:  Jonathan C Flavell; Harriet Over; Tim Vestner; Richard Cook; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The interplay between gaze and consistency in scene viewing: Evidence from visual search by young and older adults.

Authors:  Eunice G Fernandes; Louise H Phillips; Gillian Slessor; Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Assumptions about the positioning of virtual stimuli affect gaze direction estimates during Augmented Reality based interactions.

Authors:  Nicola Binetti; Tianchang Cheng; Isabelle Mareschal; Duncan Brumby; Simon Julier; Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The effects of body direction and posture on taking the perspective of a humanoid avatar in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Sachiyo Ueda; Kazuya Nagamachi; Junya Nakamura; Maki Sugimoto; Masahiko Inami; Michiteru Kitazaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.