Dorota Zarnowiecki1, Ha Nguyen1, John Boffa2, Leonie Segal3. 1. Health Economics and Social Policy Research Group, Centre for Population Health, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia. 2. Central Australian Aboriginal Congress Aboriginal Corporation, Australia. 3. Health Economics and Social Policy Research Group, Centre for Population Health, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia. Electronic address: leonie.segal@unisa.edu.au.
Abstract
CONTEXT: The Australian Nurse-Family Partnership Program is a home visiting program for Aboriginal mothers and infants (pregnancy to child's second birthday) adapted from the US Nurse Family Partnership program. It aims to improve outcomes for Australian Aboriginal mothers and babies, and disrupt intergenerational cycles of poor health and social and economic disadvantage. The aim of this study was to describe the complexity of Program clients in the Central Australian family partnership program, understand how client complexity affects program delivery and the implications for desirable program modification. METHODS: Australian Nurse-Family Partnership Program data collected using standardised data forms by nurses during pregnancy home visits (n = 276 clients from 2009 to 2015) were used to describe client complexity and adversity in relation to demographic and economic characteristics, mental health and personal safety. Semi-structured interviews with 11 Australian Nurse-Family Partnership Program staff and key stakeholders explored in more depth the nature of client adversity and how this affected Program delivery. FINDINGS: Most clients were described as "complicated" being exposed to extreme poverty (66% on welfare), living with insecure housing, many experiencing domestic violence (almost one third experiencing 2 + episodes of violence in 12 months). Sixty-six percent of clients had experienced four or more adversities. These adversities were found challenging for Program delivery. For example, housing conditions mean that around half of all 'home visits' could not be conducted in the home (held instead in staff cars or community locations) and together with exposure to violence undermined client capacity to translate program learnings into action. Crises with the basics of living regularly intruded into the delivery of program content, and low client literacy meant written hand-outs were unhelpful for many, requiring the development of pictorial-based program materials. Adversity increased the time needed to deliver program content. CONCLUSIONS: Modifications to the Australian Nurse-Family Partnership Program model to reflect the specific complexities and adversities faced by the client populations is important for effective service delivery and to maximise the chance of meeting program goals of improving the health and well-being of Australian Aboriginal mothers and their infants.
CONTEXT: The Australian Nurse-Family Partnership Program is a home visiting program for Aboriginal mothers and infants (pregnancy to child's second birthday) adapted from the US Nurse Family Partnership program. It aims to improve outcomes for Australian Aboriginal mothers and babies, and disrupt intergenerational cycles of poor health and social and economic disadvantage. The aim of this study was to describe the complexity of Program clients in the Central Australian family partnership program, understand how client complexity affects program delivery and the implications for desirable program modification. METHODS: Australian Nurse-Family Partnership Program data collected using standardised data forms by nurses during pregnancy home visits (n = 276 clients from 2009 to 2015) were used to describe client complexity and adversity in relation to demographic and economic characteristics, mental health and personal safety. Semi-structured interviews with 11 Australian Nurse-Family Partnership Program staff and key stakeholders explored in more depth the nature of client adversity and how this affected Program delivery. FINDINGS: Most clients were described as "complicated" being exposed to extreme poverty (66% on welfare), living with insecure housing, many experiencing domestic violence (almost one third experiencing 2 + episodes of violence in 12 months). Sixty-six percent of clients had experienced four or more adversities. These adversities were found challenging for Program delivery. For example, housing conditions mean that around half of all 'home visits' could not be conducted in the home (held instead in staff cars or community locations) and together with exposure to violence undermined client capacity to translate program learnings into action. Crises with the basics of living regularly intruded into the delivery of program content, and low client literacy meant written hand-outs were unhelpful for many, requiring the development of pictorial-based program materials. Adversity increased the time needed to deliver program content. CONCLUSIONS: Modifications to the Australian Nurse-Family Partnership Program model to reflect the specific complexities and adversities faced by the client populations is important for effective service delivery and to maximise the chance of meeting program goals of improving the health and well-being of Australian Aboriginal mothers and their infants.
Authors: Laura-Louise Arundell; Helen Greenwood; Helen Baldwin; Eleanor Kotas; Shubulade Smith; Kasia Trojanowska; Chris Cooper Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2020-05-26
Authors: Katherine A Thurber; Johanna Long; Minette Salmon; Adolfo G Cuevas; Raymond Lovett Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Kesley de Oliveira Reticena; Vânia do Nascimento Tolentino Yabuchi; Maria Fernanda Pereira Gomes; Lucíola D'Emery Siqueira; Flávia Corrêa Porto de Abreu; Lislaine Aparecida Fracolli Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2019-12-05
Authors: Ariana C Kong; Mariana S Sousa; Lucie Ramjan; Michelle Dickson; Joanne Goulding; Kylie Gwynne; Folau Talbot; Nathan Jones; Ravi Srinivas; Ajesh George Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2020-10-23