Literature DB >> 29979958

Symbolic flexibility during unsupervised word learning in children and adults.

Tanja C Roembke1, Kelsey K Wiggs2, Bob McMurray3.   

Abstract

Considerable debate in language acquisition concerns whether word learning is driven by domain-general (symbolically flexible) or domain-specific learning mechanisms. Prior work has shown that very young children can map objects to either words or nonlinguistic sounds, but by 20 months of age this ability narrows to only words. This suggests that although symbolically flexible mechanisms are operative early, they become more specified over development. However, such research has been conducted only with young children in ostensive teaching contexts. Thus, we investigated symbolic flexibility at later ages in more referentially ambiguous learning situations. In Experiment 1, 47 6- to 8-year-olds acquired eight symbol-object mappings in a cross-situational word learning paradigm where multiple mappings are learned based only on co-occurrence. In the word condition participants learned with novel pseudowords, whereas in the sound condition participants learned with nonlinguistic sounds (e.g., beeps). Children acquired the mappings, but performance did not differ across conditions, suggesting broad symbolic flexibility. In Experiment 2, 41 adults learned 16 mappings in a comparable design. They learned with ease in both conditions but showed a significant advantage for words. Thus, symbolic flexibility decreases with age, potentially due to repeated experiences with linguistic materials. Moreover, trial-by-trial analyses of the microstructure of both children's and adults' performance did not reveal any substantial differences due to condition, consistent with the hypothesis that learning mechanisms are generally employed similarly with both words and nonlinguistic sounds.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-situational learning; Language development; Statistical learning; Symbolic flexibility; Vocabulary acquisition; Word learning

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29979958      PMCID: PMC6086380          DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  40 in total

1.  Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: access to separable statistical cues by individual learners.

Authors:  R H Hunt; R N Aslin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-12

2.  Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes.

Authors:  J Fiser; R N Aslin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

3.  The First Slow Step: Differential Effects of Object and Word-Form Familiarization on Retention of Fast-Mapped Words.

Authors:  Sarah C Kucker; Larissa K Samuelson
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2011-06-09

4.  Encoding multielement scenes: statistical learning of visual feature hierarchies.

Authors:  József Fiser; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-11

5.  A cautionary note on the effects of range restriction on predictor intercorrelations.

Authors:  Paul R Sackett; Filip Lievens; Christopher M Berry; Richard N Landers
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2007-03

6.  Slowing Down Fast Mapping: Redefining the Dynamics of Word Learning.

Authors:  Sarah C Kucker; Bob McMurray; Larissa K Samuelson
Journal:  Child Dev Perspect       Date:  2015-03-12

7.  Propose but verify: fast mapping meets cross-situational word learning.

Authors:  John C Trueswell; Tamara Nicol Medina; Alon Hafri; Lila R Gleitman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults.

Authors:  J R Saffran; E K Johnson; R N Aslin; E L Newport
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-02-01

9.  Speaker variability augments phonological processing in early word learning.

Authors:  Gwyneth C Rost; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-03

10.  Competitive processes in cross-situational word learning.

Authors:  Daniel Yurovsky; Chen Yu; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-04-22
View more
  2 in total

1.  Multiple components of statistical word learning are resource dependent: Evidence from a dual-task learning paradigm.

Authors:  Tanja C Roembke; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-03-17

2.  Cross-Situational Statistical Learning of New Words Despite Bilateral Hippocampal Damage and Severe Amnesia.

Authors:  David E Warren; Tanja C Roembke; Natalie V Covington; Bob McMurray; Melissa C Duff
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.169

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.