| Literature DB >> 29979796 |
Esaú C João1, Orlando da C Ferreira2, Maria Isabel Gouvêa1,3, Maria de Lourdes B Teixeira1,3, Amilcar Tanuri2, Luiza M Higa2, Deise A Costa4, Ronaldo Mohana-Borges4, Mônica B Arruda2, Haroldo J Matos5, Maria Leticia Cruz1, Wallace Mendes-Silva6, Jennifer S Read7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Zika virus (ZIKV) was first isolated in Uganda in 1947. In Brazil, the first reported case of ZIKV infection was in May 2015. Additionally, dengue (DENV) is endemic and there has been a recent outbreak of chikungunya (CHIKV). Since the clinical manifestations of different arboviral infections (AI) can be similar, definitive diagnosis requires laboratory testing.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29979796 PMCID: PMC6034846 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200168
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Algorithm for diagnostic tests in symptomatic and asymptomatic pregnant women.
Characteristics of HIV-infected pregnant women, overall and according to ZIKV co-infection.
| Characteristic | Total (N = 219) | ZIKV infection | No ZIKV infection | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (N = 34) | (N = 185) | ||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | ||
| 0.77 | |||||||
| <20 | 29 | 13.24 | 4 | 11.80 | 25 | 13.50 | |
| 20–29 | 123 | 56.16 | 18 | 52.90 | 105 | 56.80 | |
| 30–39 | 60 | 27.40 | 10 | 29.40 | 50 | 27.00 | |
| ≥40 | 7 | 3.20 | 2 | 5.90 | 5 | 2.700 | |
| 0.23 | |||||||
| White | 58 | 26.48 | 12 | 35.20 | 46 | 24.90 | |
| Black | 62 | 28.31 | 11 | 32.40 | 51 | 27.60 | |
| Mixed | 99 | 45.21 | 11 | 32.40 | 88 | 47.50 | |
| 0.39 | |||||||
| Single | 80 | 36.53 | 17 | 50.00 | 63 | 34.10 | |
| Married | 18 | 8.22 | 1 | 2.90 | 17 | 9.20 | |
| Stable union | 99 | 54.34 | 16 | 47.10 | 103 | 55.70 | |
| Divorced | 1 | 0.46 | - | - | 1 | 0.50 | |
| Widowed | 1 | 0.46 | - | - | 1 | 0.50 | |
| 0.75 | |||||||
| 0–4 | 19 | 8.68 | 4 | 11.80 | 15 | 8.10 | |
| 5–9 | 98 | 44.75 | 15 | 44.10 | 83 | 44.90 | |
| 10–14 | 98 | 44.75 | 15 | 44.10 | 83 | 44.90 | |
| >15 | 4 | 4.00 | - | - | 4 | 2.10 | |
| 0.32 | |||||||
| < 200 | 29 | 13.25 | 2 | 5.9 | 27 | 14.16 | |
| ≥ 200, <500 | 98 | 44.75 | 15 | 44.10 | 83 | 44.90 | |
| ≥ 500 | 92 | 42.00 | 17 | 50.00 | 75 | 40.50 | |
| 0.13 | |||||||
| Yes | 170 | 77.63 | 23 | 67.60 | 147 | 79.50 | |
| No | 49 | 22.37 | 11 | 32.40 | 38 | 20.50 | |
| 0.14 | |||||||
| Yes | 77 | 36.77 | 8 | 85.00 | 69 | 38.80 | |
| No | 133 | 63.33 | 24 | 75.00 | 109 | 61.20 | |
| 0.02 | |||||||
| Before conception | 79 | 36.07 | 18 | 52.94 | 61 | 32.97 | |
| During pregnancy | 140 | 63.93 | 16 | 47.06 | 124 | 67.03 | |
| 0.0012 | |||||||
| Yes | 23 | 10.50 | 10 | 29.4 | 13 | 7.0 | |
| No | 196 | 89.50 | 24 | 70.6 | 72 | 93.0. | |
Interpretation of ZIKV and DENV laboratory assays.
| Zika PCR | Zika | Zika | Dengue IgM | Zika PRNT | Dengue PRNT | # of cases | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | Confirmed Zika virus infection |
| - | Positive | Positive | Negative | >20 | ≤20 | 6 | Recent Zika virus infection |
| - | Positive | Positive | Positive | >20 | ≤20 | 1 | Recent Zika virus infection |
| - | Positive | Positive | Negative | >20 | >20 | 14 | Recent Flavivirus infection |
| - | Positive | Positive | Positive | >20 | >20 | 5 | Recent Flavivirus infection |
| - | Positive | Inconclusive | Negative | >20 | ≤20 | 1 | Evidence Zika virus infection |
| - | Positive | Inconclusive | Negative | >20 | >20 | 2 | Evidence Flavivirus infection |
| - | Positive | Negative | Positive | ≤20 | >20 | 1 | Recent Dengue virus infection |
| - | Negative | Not done | Positive | ≤20 | >20 | 1 | Recent Dengue virus infection |
| - | Positive | Inconclusive | Negative | — | — | 2 | Inconclusive results |
| - | Negative | Not done | Positive | ≤20 | ≤20 | 3 | No evidence of Zika or dengue virus infection |
| - | Positive | Negative | Negative | — | — | 27 | No evidence of Zika or dengue virus infection |
| - | Negative | Not done | Negative | — | — | 151 | No evidence of Zika or dengue virus infection |
Results of multivariate Poisson modeling of risk factors (among 219 HIV-infected pregnant women) associated with CNS malformations in their infants.
| Variables | Coefficient | Stderror | Z value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1550 | 0.1476 | 1.051 | 0.29342 | |
| 0.2849 | 0.09462 | 3.011 | ||
| -0.00005084 | 0.0001245 | -0.408 | 0.68308 | |
| -0.0003098 | 0.01233 | -0.025 | 0.97995 | |
| -0.04603 | 0.07792 | -0.591 | 0.55469 |
Characteristics of infants with CNS malformations (n = 4) born to mothers with laboratory evidence of ZIKV infection during pregnancy.
| CNS Malformation | Gestational age at birth (weeks) | Gestational age at maternal ZIKV infection | Maternal CD4 cell count (cells/mm3)at enrollment | Maternal HIV viral load (Log10) at enrollment | Maternal HIV viral load (Log10) near delivery | Use of ARVs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microcephaly, arthrogryposis, hydrops (at ultrasonography) | 20 (fetal loss) | 6 | 169 | Undetectable | NA | Yes |
| Hydrocephaly, cerebral calcifications, meningomyelocele | 37 | 7 | 500 | Undetectable | Undetectable | Yes |
| Ventriculomegaly, brain calcifications, microcephaly | 40 | 24 | 262 | 4.3 | 1.77 | No |
| MIcrocephaly | 39 | >12 and <32 | 996 | 3.5 | Undetectable | Yes |
a Not applicable–abortion
b Asymptomatic. Seroconversion between >12 and < 32 weeks of gestation