| Literature DB >> 29979767 |
Jesús López-Angulo1, David S Pescador1, Ana M Sánchez1, Maritza A K Mihoč2, Lohengrin A Cavieres2,3, Adrián Escudero1.
Abstract
Mountains are considered excellent natural laboratories for studying the determinants of plant diversity at contrasting spatial scales. To gain insights into how plant diversity is structured at different spatial scales, we surveyed high mountain plant communities in the Chilean Andes where man-driven perturbations are rare. This was done along elevational gradients located at different latitudes taking into account factors that act at fine scales, including abiotic (potential solar radiation and soil quality) and biotic (species interactions) factors, and considering multiple spatial scales. Species richness, inverse of Simpson's concentration (Dequiv), beta-diversity and plant cover were estimated using the percentage of cover per species recorded in 34 sites in the different regions with contrasted climates. Overall, plant species richness, Dequiv and plant cover were lower in sites located at higher latitudes. We found a unimodal relationship between species richness and elevation and this pattern was constant independently of the regional climatic conditions. Soil quality decreased the beta-diversity among the plots in each massif and increased the richness, the Dequiv and cover. Segregated patterns of species co-occurrence were related to increases in richness, Dequiv and plant cover at finer scales. Our results showed that elevation patterns of alpine plant diversity remained constant along the regions although the mechanisms underlying these diversity patterns may differ among climatic regions. They also suggested that the patterns of plant diversity in alpine ecosystems respond to a series of factors (abiotic and biotic) that act jointly at different spatial scale determining the assemblages of local communities, but their importance can only be assessed using a multi-scale spatial approach.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29979767 PMCID: PMC6034847 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200216
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Experimental design.
(a) Locations of the three study areas (black quadrats) along the Chilean Andes. Colours (purple = Mediterranean-type climate region with a severe drought summer, green = Mediterranean-type climate region with a milder drought summer and red = sub-Antarctic region) represent three different climatic zones according to Sarricolea [45]; (b) plot distribution along the three areas; and (c) typical structure of the vegetation in each area.
Coefficients of the models (GLMs and GLMMs) examining the effects of environmental factors on the diversity indices at plot (20 x 20 m), at quadrat (2.4 x 2.4 m) and cell (30 x 30 cm) scales.
| plot scale | quadrat scale | cell scale | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species richness | |||||||||
| Intercept (Farellones) | 3.08 | 2.27 | 0.48 | ||||||
| Massif | |||||||||
| Maule | 0.24 | ab | 0.26 | ab | 0.63 | ab | |||
| Torres del Paine | 0.29 | b | 0.43 | b | 0.63 | b | |||
| Elevation | -0.12 | -0.08 | -0.02 | ||||||
| Elevation2 | -0.10 | ||||||||
| Soil quality | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.32 | ||||||
| Potential solar radiation | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.07 | ||||||
| C-score | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.45 | ||||||
| R2 | 0.89 | ||||||||
| R2m | 0.39 | 0.41 | |||||||
| R2c | 0.70 | 0.56 | |||||||
| Inverse of Simpson’s concentration | |||||||||
| Intercept (Farellones) | 6.21 | 4.91 | 1.20 | ||||||
| Massif | |||||||||
| Maule | 9.50 | b | 3.47 | ab | 1.55 | b | |||
| Torres del Paine | 9.12 | b | 4.62 | b | 1.52 | b | |||
| Elevation | -0.16 | 0.06 | 0.17 | ||||||
| Soil quality | 3.80 | 0.99 | 0.69 | ||||||
| Potential solar radiation | 0.07 | 0.29 | 0.03 | ||||||
| C-score | 1.32 | 1.88 | 1.01 | ||||||
| R2 | 0.50 | ||||||||
| R2m | 0.32 | 0.38 | |||||||
| R2c | 0.67 | 0.53 | |||||||
| Beta-diversity | |||||||||
| Intercept (Farellones) | 0.86 | 0.48 | 0.78 | ||||||
| Massif | |||||||||
| Maule | -0.05 | a | -0.01 | 0.04 | |||||
| Torres del Paine | -0.16 | b | 0.05 | 0.01 | |||||
| Elevation | -0.04 | 0.03 | 0.00 | ||||||
| Soil quality | -0.04 | -0.00 | -0.01 | ||||||
| Potential solar radiation | 0.01 | -0.01 | -0.03 | ||||||
| C-score | -0.01 | 0.03 | -0.06 | ||||||
| R2 | 0.67 | ||||||||
| R2m | 0.18 | 0.16 | |||||||
| R2c | 0.64 | 0.63 | |||||||
| Plant cover | |||||||||
| Intercept (Farellones) | 14.134 | 2.634 | 2.16 | ||||||
| Massif | * | ||||||||
| Maule | 7.599 | ab | -0.065 | 0.17 | |||||
| Torres del Paine | 15.836 | b | 0.242 | -0.07 | |||||
| Elevation | -2.825 | -0.239 | 0.03 | ||||||
| Soil quality | 9.081 | 0.286 | 0.43 | ||||||
| Potential solar radiation | 1.649 | 0.051 | 0.20 | ||||||
| C-score | 2.849 | 0.197 | 0.32 | ||||||
| R2 | 0.62 | ||||||||
| R2m | 0.25 | 0.17 | |||||||
| R2c | 0.39 | 0.33 | |||||||
Elevation2: the quadratic term of Elevation.
R2: variance explained by each model. R2m: marginal variance explained by fixed factors. R2c: conditional variance explained by both fixed and random factors.
The significance is shown as
*** P<0.001
** P<0.005
* P<0.05.
Different letters within columns indicate significant differences (P< 0.05) between Farellones (a) and the other two regions according to Tukey's range test
Fig 2Conceptual diagram showing the relationship between species richness and the standardized elevation across contrasted latitudes.
Species richness variation along an elevational gradient in a sub-Antarctic mountain (blue lines) and in two Mediterranean-climate type mountains with different length in dry season: long dry season (red lines) and short dry season (purple lines). The solid lines represent the richness patterns when the main environmental stressor is coldness. The dotted lines represent the richness patterns when summer drought (red dotted line), facilitation (blue dotted line), or both mechanisms (purple dotted lines) act modulating the original monotonic pattern. Decreasing and increasing species richness are represented by the red and blue shaded area, respectively.