| Literature DB >> 29979432 |
Qi Zheng1, Xiao Ying Sun, Xiao Miao, Rong Xu, Tian Ma, Ya Nan Zhang, Hong Jin Li, Bin Li, Xin Li.
Abstract
Psoriasis is a common chronic relapsing immune-mediated inflammatory disease, whose prevalence has increased in recent years. Some physicians believe that physical activity is associated with numerous health-related benefits in adults with dermatoses. While numerous studies have suggested an association between psoriasis and physical activity, others have yielded contradictory results. The aim of our study was to evaluate the association between the level of physical activity and prevalence of psoriasis.A comprehensive search of the literature was performed from January 1970 to February 2017 using EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials electronic databases. Studies published in English were reviewed to identify the contribution of intensity of physical activity on the prevalence of psoriasis.The search strategy yielded 1100 relevant studies, among which 13 observational studies were included. We found that patients with psoriasis exercise significantly less vigorously than controls (relative risk [RR]: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-0.85; P < .00001). Predominantly, these patients exercised at moderate intensity (RR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.18-0.90; P = .03). Some patients had lesser degree of movement, and some exercised strenuously. There were no significant differences observed in the intensity of exercise performed by controls (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.46-1.77; P = .76). The 3 studies found the frequency of regular exercise differed significantly between patients with psoriasis and controls (RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.82-0.95; P = .0007).Different severities of psoriasis have different influences on patients' physical activity levels. Patients with a higher proportion of psoriatic lesions and self-awareness were associated with lower-intensity exercises. Our meta-analysis highlights the fact that intense physical activity may lower the prevalence of psoriasis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29979432 PMCID: PMC6076093 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011394
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.889
Figure 1Flowchart depicting the study selection.
Observational studies included in the meta-analysis.
Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) Quality Assessment Table.
Figure 2Meta-analysis of the impact on exercise levels of patients with psoriasis and healthy controls. The RR in different exercise levels of psoriatic patients and healthy controls. The point estimate (center of each blue square) and statistical size (proportional area of the square) are represented. Horizontal lines indicate 95% confidence intervals. The subtotal and total pooled RR (diamond) was calculated using a random-effects model. RR = risk ratio.
Figure 3Meta-analysis of the impact on exercise minutes of patients with psoriasis and healthy controls. The SMD in different exercise levels of psoriatic patients and healthy controls. The point estimate (center of each blue square) and statistical size (proportional area of the square) are represented. Horizontal lines indicate 95% confidence intervals. The subtotal and total SMD (diamond) were calculated using a random-effects model. SMD = standard mean difference.
Figure 4Meta-analysis of the impact on exercise scores of patients with psoriasis and healthy controls. The SMD in different exercise scores of psoriatic patients and healthy controls. The point estimate (center of each blue square) and statistical size (proportional area of the square) are represented. Horizontal lines indicate 95% confidence intervals. The subtotal and total SMD (diamond) were calculated using a random-effects model. SMD = standard mean difference.
Figure 5Meta-analysis of patients with psoriasis with different exercise levels. The point estimate (center of each blue square) and statistical size (proportional area of the square) are represented. Horizontal lines indicate 95% confidence intervals. The subtotal and total pooled RR (diamond) was calculated using a random-effects model. RR = risk ratio.
Figure 6Meta-analysis of healthy controls with different exercise levels. The point estimate (center of each blue square) and statistical size (proportional area of the square) are represented. Horizontal lines indicate 95% confidence intervals. The subtotal and total pooled RR (diamond) was calculated using a random-effects model. RR = risk ratio.
Figure 7Meta-analysis of the frequency of regular exercise in patients with psoriasis and healthy controls. The point estimate (center of each blue square) and statistical size (proportional area of the square) are represented. Horizontal lines indicate 95% confidence intervals. The subtotal and total pooled RR (diamond) was calculated using a fixed-effects model. RR = risk ratio.