Literature DB >> 29979249

A Structured Compensation Plan Improves But Does Not Erase the Sex Pay Gap in Surgery.

Melanie Morris1, Herb Chen, Martin J Heslin, Helen Krontiras.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between the sex pay gap in a large academic department of surgery and a recently instituted structured compensation plan. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A recent large study found that after controlling for measures of academic and clinical productivity, male physicians earned nearly $20,000 more annually than female physicians. Increased salary transparency has been proposed as a method to reduce this disparity.
METHODS: A new structured compensation plan was developed to improve transparency of compensation and financial viability of each division. The total compensations of each faculty member before and after the new compensation plan were calculated. Salaries were compared with the Association of Academic Medical Colleges (AAMC) median value based on specialty, region, academic rank, stratified by sex and compared. Work relative value units (wRVUs) were calculated for each faculty member during the entire study period, stratified by sex and compared.
RESULTS: Among 44 eligible surgeons (33 men and 11 women), a sex pay gap existed with male surgeon salaries significantly higher than female surgeon salaries [56% (8 to 213) vs 26% (1 to 64); P < 0.00001] despite similar RVU production (men 8725 ± 831 vs women 7818 ± 911, P = 0.454). The new compensation plan did not significantly change male surgeon salaries [56% (8 to 213) vs 58% (26 to 159); P = 0.552] but did significantly increase the salaries of female surgeons [26% (1 to 64) vs 42% (10 to 80); P = 0.026].
CONCLUSION: A structured compensation plan can improve the sex pay gap in a short period of time. More transparency in surgical compensation plans is essential to understand the most equitable way to compensate all surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29979249     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  6 in total

1.  Career Goals, Salary Expectations, and Salary Negotiation Among Male and Female General Surgery Residents.

Authors:  Kelsey Gray; Angela Neville; Amy H Kaji; Mary Wolfe; Kristine Calhoun; Farin Amersi; Timothy Donahue; Tracy Arnell; Benjamin Jarman; Kenji Inaba; Marc Melcher; Jon B Morris; Brian Smith; Mark Reeves; Jeffrey Gauvin; Edgardo S Salcedo; Richard Sidwell; Kenric Murayama; Richard Damewood; V Prasad Poola; Daniel Dent; Christian de Virgilio
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Closing the gender pay gap in Canadian medicine.

Authors:  Michelle Cohen; Tara Kiran
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  NIH Funding of Researchers in Surgery: Decreased Career Development Awards Over Time.

Authors:  Mary Smithson; M Chandler McLeod; Dan I Chu; Greg Kennedy; Melanie Morris; Herbert Chen; Karin M Hardiman
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.417

4.  A Primer for Success as an Early Career Academic Plastic Surgeon.

Authors:  Lawrence O Lin; Jenny C Barker; Ibrahim Khansa; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-01-25

5.  Analysis of Physician Compensation Studies by Gender, Race, and Ethnicity.

Authors:  Allison R Larson; Meridith J Englander; Quentin R Youmans; Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez; Fatima Cody Stanford; Sheritta A Strong; Howard Y Liu; Julie K Silver
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2022-02-01

Review 6.  The experiences of female surgeons around the world: a scoping review.

Authors:  Meredith D Xepoleas; Naikhoba C O Munabi; Allyn Auslander; William P Magee; Caroline A Yao
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2020-10-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.