Linda Trinh1, Steve Amireault1,2, Jason Lacombe1, Catherine M Sabiston1. 1. Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Science, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reducing sedentary behavior (SED) may be one promising strategy to reduce treatment-related side effects in breast cancer given the unique health benefits distinct from the beneficial effects of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA). OBJECTIVES: To examine the associations between SED and the late-effects symptoms of pain, fatigue, and depression among breast cancer survivors (BCS), and the interactive associations between SED, light PA, and MVPA on these symptoms. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-five BCS provided baseline data 3 to 4 months post-systemic treatment, as part of the Life After Breast Cancer: Moving On longitudinal study. Pain, fatigue, and depression symptoms were assessed using validated self-report questionnaires. Objective measures of MVPA, light PA, and SED (i.e. sitting time) were assessed by accelerometers over the same period. Self-reported demographic and medical variables were collected. RESULTS: In hierarchical multiple regression analyses, the interaction effect of MVPA by SED was significantly associated with pain (p = .02), fatigue (p = .01), and depression (p = .006). Follow-up simple slope analyses demonstrated that among BCS with lower levels of MVPA, higher levels of SED significantly predicted higher levels of fatigue (p < .001), higher levels of pain (p = .06), and higher levels of depression (p = .08). CONCLUSIONS: SED was associated with higher levels of fatigue, pain, and depression in BCS, and was more pronounced among those with lower levels of MVPA. However, SED was not associated with these symptoms among BCS with higher levels of MVPA. Pairing health promotion messages to reduce SED and increase MVPA are likely to result in better symptom management.
BACKGROUND: Reducing sedentary behavior (SED) may be one promising strategy to reduce treatment-related side effects in breast cancer given the unique health benefits distinct from the beneficial effects of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA). OBJECTIVES: To examine the associations between SED and the late-effects symptoms of pain, fatigue, and depression among breast cancer survivors (BCS), and the interactive associations between SED, light PA, and MVPA on these symptoms. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-five BCS provided baseline data 3 to 4 months post-systemic treatment, as part of the Life After Breast Cancer: Moving On longitudinal study. Pain, fatigue, and depression symptoms were assessed using validated self-report questionnaires. Objective measures of MVPA, light PA, and SED (i.e. sitting time) were assessed by accelerometers over the same period. Self-reported demographic and medical variables were collected. RESULTS: In hierarchical multiple regression analyses, the interaction effect of MVPA by SED was significantly associated with pain (p = .02), fatigue (p = .01), and depression (p = .006). Follow-up simple slope analyses demonstrated that among BCS with lower levels of MVPA, higher levels of SED significantly predicted higher levels of fatigue (p < .001), higher levels of pain (p = .06), and higher levels of depression (p = .08). CONCLUSIONS: SED was associated with higher levels of fatigue, pain, and depression in BCS, and was more pronounced among those with lower levels of MVPA. However, SED was not associated with these symptoms among BCS with higher levels of MVPA. Pairing health promotion messages to reduce SED and increase MVPA are likely to result in better symptom management.
Authors: Alejandro Álvarez-Bustos; Cristina G de Pedro; María Romero-Elías; Javier Ramos; Pablo Osorio; Blanca Cantos; Constanza Maximiano; Miriam Méndez; Carmen Fiuza-Luces; Marta Méndez-Otero; Silvia Martín; Héctor Cebolla; Ana Ruiz-Casado Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-04-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Carissa A Low; Michaela Danko; Krina C Durica; Abhineeth Reddy Kunta; Raghu Mulukutla; Yiyi Ren; David L Bartlett; Dana H Bovbjerg; Anind K Dey; John M Jakicic Journal: JMIR Perioper Med Date: 2020-03-23
Authors: Linda Trinh; Catherine M Sabiston; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Jennifer M Jones; Kelly P Arbour-Nicitopoulos; Daniel Santa Mina; Kristin Campbell; Guy E Faulkner Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Vincenza Gianfredi; Lorenzo Blandi; Stefano Cacitti; Mirko Minelli; Carlo Signorelli; Andrea Amerio; Anna Odone Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Diane K Ehlers; Jason Fanning; Alexis Sunderlage; Joan Severson; Arthur F Kramer; Edward McAuley Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Sandra J M van Cappellen-van Maldegem; Floortje Mols; Nicole Horevoorts; Anja de Kruif; Laurien M Buffart; Dounya Schoormans; Hester Trompetter; Sandra Beijer; Nicole P M Ezendam; Michiel de Boer; Renate Winkels; Ellen Kampman; Jantine Schuit; Lonneke van de Poll-Franse; Jacob C Seidell; Meeke Hoedjes Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 2.809