| Literature DB >> 29977916 |
Ning Dong1, Bing Xu1, Jingmei Xu1.
Abstract
The previous study has demonstrated that epidermal growth factor (EGF) and EGF receptor (EGFR) signaling plays a critical role in the development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) through regulating lens epithelial cells (LECs) proliferation. Recent studies have suggested that the residual LECs undergo proliferation and migration, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is the important cause of PCO formation after cataract surgery. EMT of LECs is considered to be playing a central role in the pathogenesis of PCO. In the present study, we investigated whether and how EGF may regulate EMT of LECs. First, we demonstrated that EGF and EGFR signaling induces Myc overexpression in primary human lens epithelial cells (HLECs). In turn, Myc overexpression could inhibit miR-26b by recruitment of HDAC3. Consequently, the downregulated expression of miR-26b increased the expression of EZH2 in primary HLECs. Mechanistically, miR-26b directly controls EZH2 expression by targeting its 3'-UTR in HLECs by luciferase reporter assays. Finally, we demonstrated that EGF induces the expression of EMT markers in primary HLECs via a miR-26b-dependent mechanism. In summary, EGF activated Myc and Myc overexpression inhibited miR-26b by recruitment of HDAC3, which in turn induced the expression of EZH2 and promoted the progression of EMT in HLECs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29977916 PMCID: PMC5998198 DOI: 10.1155/2018/7148023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Primers used for qRT-PCR and cloning.
| Primers | Sequence | |
|---|---|---|
| Sense | Antisense | |
| GAPDH | 5′-AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG-3′ | 5′-TGTAGACCATGTAGTTGAGGTCA-3′ |
| U6 | 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′ | 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′ |
| miR-26b | 5′-CTCAAGGGCTTGTGCTGACT-3′ | 5′-ACCTCAGCCTAGTGCAGGAA-3′ |
| Fibronectin | 5′-TCTGTGCCTCCTATCTATGTGC-3′ | 5′-GAGGGACCACGACAACTCTTC-3′ |
|
| 5′-CCGACCGAATGCAGAAGGA-3′ | 5′-ACAGAGTATTTGCGCTCCGAA-3′ |
| Myc | 5′-TCAGAGAAGCTGGCCTCCTA-3′ | 5′-TCGTTGGAGGAGAGCAGAGA-3′ |
| EZH2 | 5′-CCAACATTGGAGTGATTCAG-3′ | 5′-TCATCAGATGATTTAGCCCA-3′ |
| HDAC1 | 5′-GCGAGCAAGATGGCGCAGACT-3′ | 5′-GTGAGGCTTCATTGGGTGCCCT-3′ |
| HDAC2 | 5′-TGAAGCCAAACTTCCTCAAACA-3′ | 5′-CGGAGGACAAGAGGACAGATG-3′ |
| HDAC3 | 5′-CACATCGTCATCTCGATTTCCT-3′ | 5′-GGCATGGCTCTCTGAAACCTTA-3′ |
| HDAC4 | 5′-GAGTACTGCCGAGCAGTCTGAA-3′ | 5′-CACTTTAATTGGGTCTGGAGGC-3′ |
| HDAC5 | 5′-TTCTTCAACTCCGTAGCC-3′ | 5′-TCCCATTGTCGTAGCG-3′ |
| HDAC6 | 5′-TGTGGCTGCCCGCTATGCAC-3′ | 5′-GGGGCCAGAACCGACCATGC-3′ |
| HDAC7 | 5′-ACCCAACCTCAATGCC-3′ | 5′-GATGCCAACGGAAAGG-3′ |
| HDAC8 | 5′-CCAGCCACAGAAGGGATA-3′ | 5′-TTCCGTCGCAATCGTAAT-3′ |
| HDAC9 | 5′-GTCCCTGCCCAATATCAC-3′ | 5′-GCTGTTCGGTTTGCCCTC-3′ |
| HDAC10 | 5′-CCGGCAGAGGGCGTGTTGAG-3′ | 5′-CAAGGCAGCTGTCAGGCGCT-3′ |
| HDAC11 | 5′-ACAACCGCCACATCTAC-3′ | 5′-AGGGACCTCCTCACATT-3′ |
| EZH2-3′UTR-WT-luc | 5′-TATCTAGACATCTGCTACCTCCTCCC-3′ | 5′-ATGCGGCCGCGATTCAACAAGGACAA-3′ |
| EZH2-3′UTR-MT-luc | 5′-TATCTAGACATCTGCTACCTCCTCCC-3′ | 5′- CTGCTACCTCCTCCC-3′ |
Figure 1EGF induces EMT in primary HLECs. (a) The primary HLECs were treated with different concentrations of EGF for 48 h. The expression of E-cadherin proteins in primary HLECs was determined by Western blot. (b) The primary HLECs were treated with 10 ng/mL of EGF for different time. The expression of E-cadherin proteins was measured by Western blot. (c–f) The expression of fibronectin mRNA and α-SMA mRNA was measured by qRT-PCR. (c, e) The primary HLECs were treated with different concentrations of EGF for 48 h. (d, f) The primary HLECs were treated with 10 ng/mL of EGF for different time. P < 0.05 compared with group without EGF.
Figure 2The expression levels of MYC mRNA and EZH2 mRNA are increased in human PCO attached LECs and LECs obtained from patients with anterior polar cataracts. ((a) and (b)) Upregulation of MYC mRNA and EZH2 mRNA was detected in human PCO attached LECs compared with normal attached LECs by qRT-PCR. ((c) and (d)) Upregulation of MYC mRNA and EZH2 mRNA was detected in the LECs obtained from patients with anterior polar cataracts compared with patients with nuclear cataracts by qRT-PCR. P < 0.05 compared with normal-attached LECs ((a) and (b)). P < 0.05 compared with nuclear cataracts LECs ((c) and (d)).
Figure 3EGF induces the expression of Myc and EZH2 in primary HLECs. (a) Effects of EGFR siRNA on EGFR expression in primary HLECs. We achieved downregulation of EGFR as monitored by Western blot analysis. (b) After 48 h of EGF (10 ng/ml) treatment, MYC and EZH2 were indeed overexpressed in primary HLECs by Western blot analysis. Moreover, EGFR knockdown led to downregulation of Myc and EZH2 expression induced by EGF. ((c) and (d)) After 48 h of EGF (10 ng/ml) treatment, MYC mRNA (c) and EZH2 mRNA (d) were overexpressed as monitored by qRT-PCR. P < 0.05 compared with normal.
Figure 4EGF can activate EZH2 transcription by activating Myc in primary HLECs. (a) 24 h after Myc or EZH2 knockdown, we measured the expression of Myc and EZH2 protein by Western blot analysis. ((b) and (c)) Primary HLECs were preincubated with Myc-specific siRNAs or EZH2-specific siRNAs for 24 hours before incubation with 10 ng/ml EGF for 48 hours. Myc mRNA and EZH2 mRNA were measured by qRT-PCR. P < 0.05 compared with EGF (a). P < 0.05 compared with normal ((b) and (c)).
Figure 5EGF regulates miR-26b expression in primary HLECs. ((a) and (b)) miR-26b expression in primary HLECs was measured by qRT-PCR. EGF stimulation inhibited the expression of miR-26b in primary HLECs. (a) The primary HLECs were incubated with the indicated concentration of EGF for 48 hours. (b) The primary HLECs were incubated with 10 ng/ml EGF for the indicated time. EGF treatment decreased the expression of miR-26b in a dose- and time-dependent manner. (c) Primary HLECs were preincubated with EGFR-specific siRNAs, Myc-specific siRNAs, or EZH2-specific siRNAs for 24 hours before incubation with 10 ng/ml EGF for 48 hours. miR-26b expression in primary HLECs was measured by qRT-PCR. P < 0.05 compared with group without EGF.
Figure 6miR-26b expression suppressed by EGF is controlled by HDAC3 in primary HLECs. (a) Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (10 μmol/L), apicidin (3 μmol/L), OSU42 (2.5 μmol/L), or TSA (0.4 μmol/L) significantly attenuated the expression of miR-26b in primary HLECs suppressed by EGF. miR-26b expression in primary HLECs was measured by qRT-PCR. (b) Primary HLECs were preincubated with HDAC1~11-specific siRNAs for 24 hours before incubation with 10 ng/ml EGF for 48 hours. miR-26b expression in primary HLECs was measured by qRT-PCR. P < 0.05 compared with normal (a). P < 0.05 compared with EGF (b).
Figure 7miR-26b directly controls EZH2 expression in HLECs. (a) EZH2 and β-actin were detected in primary HLECs after transfection with miR-26b mimics or miR-26b mimics control for 6 h by Western blot analysis. (b) Western blotting for EZH2 and β-actin in primary HLECs after transfection with anti-miR-26b or anti-miR-control for 6 h. (c) The luciferase reporter assays in the SRA01/04 cell line were measured. The miR-26b mimics or miR-26b mimics controls were cotransfected into plasmids with wild-type or mutant EZH2 3′-UTRs. P < 0.05 compared with Mock ((a) and (b)). P < 0.05 compared with miR-con mimics (c).
Figure 8EGF induces the expression of EMT markers in primary HLECs via a miR-26b-dependent mechanism. (a) Primary HLECs were preincubated with EZH2-specific siRNAs for 24 hours or miR-26b mimics for 6 h before incubation with 10 ng/ml EGF for 48 hours. E-cadherin and fibronectin protein were measured by Western blot analysis. (b) EGF induces the expression of EMT markers in primary HLECs via a miR-26b-dependent mechanism. P < 0.05 compared with normal (a).